Titanic II (Video 2010) Poster

(2010 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
242 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
What a ridiculous excuse for a film
rp-817-82699313 August 2010
This was the worst piece of television I have ever seen. Shane Van Dyke was having a laugh when he made this. The effects were a total joke, looked like a PC game from about 10 years ago. The story was madness (an 800mph tsunami forces an iceberg into the path of the titanic). James Cameron must have been laughing his head off. Acting was awful, can't believe any actors would star in this film even for money. If you have 2 hours of your life you don't want to get back, you should watch this film. Almost so bad it's actually good. I hope they don't consider a titanic 3 because that would really be a disgrace to the film industry.
231 out of 243 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
How NOT to make a movie
twatchy20 November 2010
It's laugh-out-loud BAD. The script, acting, plot are all woeful and my 12yr old could have done a more convincing job with the CGI. Most of it is filmed on the real Queen Mary which is now a hotel in Long Beach, Ca or in a concrete bunker, sorry, "engine room". They hired about 20 extras from the local homeless shelter by the look of them who wander around aimlessly or fall over their own feet during "action" sequences. There is some preachy stuff about global warming backed up by bogus "science" and a 800mph tsunami (that's faster than the speed of sound folks!). I hope this movie was released as a joke but fear it wasn't. But seriously, if you haven't seen it yet then please do so because it's hilarious and you'll have lots of fun spotting the glaring errors, continuity bloopers, wooden acting and super-low budget production. It's so bad it's good.
81 out of 85 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Horror
robert-dacey19 September 2010
Not only a waste of a hour and a half of my evening but quite possibly of my entire life! It was so painful I do not believe I could begin to adequately describe the trauma I now feel - I genuinely write this as a warning to my fellow human beings who value their sanity. Never in my life have I seen work (of any form) of such poor quality. Having only just finished viewing this film I feel the need for a shower and referral to a good psychiatrist. I've been more entertained watching paint dry - and a tin of paint could produce/direct a better cinematic experience. Simple put, if 0 out of 10 was I option I'd have awarded that instead - I want my 1.5 hours back!! THE HORROR, THE HORROR!!
188 out of 203 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Someone Actually Spent Money on This
rscafidi8524 January 2011
Well, not a lot of it (clearly), but enough to rent out the Queen Mary, hire a bunch of random extras from a Greyhound bus station, and pay some kit with a Commodore C64 to slap together a few CGI "effects". Better movies have been made for much less money, and that is both sad and infuriating.

Before even getting to the plot, such as I was able to piece together, some attention needs to be paid to the production values, if you can call them that.

No attention was paid at all to continuity, some exterior scenes and establishing shots use the 1936-vintage Queen Mary, moored in Long Beach, CA; while other outside scenes utilize some of the most god-awful CGI animation I've ever seen, which appears to depict the 1912-vintage Titanic. The ship shifts from a '30s three funnel liner to a pre-WWI four funnel liner and back again multiple times, the colors of the funnels even changes between red and yellow and the name sometimes disappears from the bow.

The permanent rock breakwater surrounding the Queen Mary can bee seen in some parts where the ship is supposed to be out at sea, along with glimpses of the Long Beach skyline in a few parts. No attempt at all was made to disguise the fact that the location ship never left port.

Interiors were filmed in either rented motel rooms, office elevator lobbies, or the main concourse in a suburban shopping mall. The engine room scenes are clearly a concrete basement with air conditioning equipment.

Extras in "action" scenes either stumble around aimlessly with no expression or intentionally trip over their own feet. All sound effects, including screaming, were added post production with no cause visible.

Now, back to the plot. Its bad. Like flimsy soft core porno bad. Some millionaire has financed the construction of an exact replica of the Titanic, which has set out on its maiden voyage from New York in 2012, on the 100th anniversary of the original. In a shocking coincidence, global warming simultaneously causes a massive ice sheet to break off from Greenland and drift toward the ship. Oh, and a tsunami. A massive, massive tsunami was caused somehow and is actually propelling the iceberg toward the ship at greater than the speed of sound. Yes, that fast. Also, only the ship is endangered and not all of Europe and North America, as might be expected from a tsunami of such biblical proportions. Part way through the movie, the actors appear to lose interest in the iceberg threat, and it is forgotten and replaced solely with the tsunami, which doesn't capsize the ship, but merely damages the hull in the same place as the original Titanic. Also, it destroys half the lifeboats- that is one smart killer wave.

I was really hoping this would be one of those campy movies that are so bad their almost good and can be appreciated ironically as unintentional comedy, but "Titanic 2" is just too bad even for that. This movie has no redeeming features whatsoever and is merely a colossal waste of time and resources. All copies of this film should be collected and shot into the sun, lest future generations find them and judge our civilization based on this affront to all taste and decency.

I'm just glad I watched this as a free bootleg on the Internet, if I had actually paid to buy or rent this, I would probably be setting something on fire right now.
199 out of 201 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Lots of CGI stuff
Mat_Hadder9 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I somehow caught this trash on cable over the weekend. I have no idea why it aired on TV in Australia before it even got a US release, but at least I didn't have to go out and rent it.

The movie opens with some guy surfing off what appears to be a Canadian ice shelf; when a large chunk of ice falls he rides the wave. Unfortunately for him, a piece of ice the size of Manhattan breaks off and that's the end of his story.

An old coast guard captain gets a call from NOAA and he flies out to the ice shelf. Lot's of mumbling about the evils of global warming and how they need to warn the planet that an epic tsunami is going to destroy the world... but most importantly it will destroy the Titanic II. It turns out the captain's daughter works as a nurse on the ship which has just set off on it's maiden voyage. The captain gets in his super-chopper and decides to fly all the way to the titanic to save his daughter.

His daughter used to date the guy that owns the shipping line and the Titanic II, he of course is on the ship. He has three girlfriends now but begins to regain his old affections for the nurse for some reason. The tsunami hits the ship conveniently wiping out half of the life rafts. I don't think the director was trying to be funny here, but all of the people bouncing back and forth pretending that the ship was falling over made me smile.

The boat continues to sink and the guy and girl run around trying to get out but don't. Fortunately they come across some scuba gear, unfortunately there's only one mouth piece. Rather than try sharing it, the guy just dies and that's pretty much the story.

Terrible acting, crappy CGI, hilarious dialogue The interiors of the Titanic II look like they were filmed in a rundown motel 6. They have a shot of the engine room and it looks like a dump truck backed into a loading bay.

How did this happen??
79 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I can't believe I even watched this
freak_out100022 September 2010
Really I can't Vote 0? Titanic 2 was an absolutely horrible waste of time. Awful acting and outdated FX, I've seen better from high school students. The story was highly unbelievable, however may have been more entertaining if better presented. The only thing that drew me to the movie and kept me watching was how bad it is. Its like when some1 says "careful its hot" you gotta touch it just to see how hot it is, I just had to watch to believe. I fully agree that Titanic 3 should never happen. Although, nor should have Titanic 2 which has left me in shock that this movie was ever made, and empathic of all involved with Cameron's Titanic for having their amazing work now associated with this.
69 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Possibly the worst movie every made ...
gerreinfo29 August 2010
Be warned that this is probably the worst movie ever made. At least it gave a good actor, Bruce Davison, employment. Nice concept, but so poorly made that you understand immediately that the makers knew zero about the 1912 Titanic and cared even less. With an obvious low budget, the movie made use of the 1930's Queen Mary permanently moored at Long Beach, CA. But, 1912 maritime design is very different from 1930s maritime design as was White Star Line, (Titanic), to Cunard Line, (Queen Mary). Shots included the sea wall enclosing the Queen Mary, rust on the railings of this "brand new Titanic II", and red funnels when the original Titanic had yellow funnels, (which they corrected within the movie and then went back to red funnels). Some scenes showed the ship with three funnels, some scenes she had four funnels. One of the best, laughable scenes was the cast running down into the "engine room" with concrete walls!!!? The Titanic II sailed with the name emblazoned on it's bow, then the name was gone, then it was back again? Where were the continuity people? Or could they not afford to employ them. The score even had slight reminisces of the movie Titanic's score in a shameful attempt to piggy-back on the success of the James Cameron movie. Gives new meaning to unoriginal and predictable. Do yourself a favor. Skip this movie. It's not even good trash.
105 out of 113 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Poor example of any kind of movie
jwebb6325 August 2010
The black guy at the Coast Guard headquarters, toothless. Anyone notice? From the imitation special effects to the silicone breasts, I've seen better hommade vacation videos. I can't imagine paying to buy this DVD, this is the most awful movie I have ever seen. The acting was high school thespian at best, they all appeared to be students of some second rate acting school. I would not recommend this video to anyone. Out of respect to the original Titanic and the poor souls who went down with her, it is a shame that such a poorly done movie about a new Titanic was done so cheaply and with such low budget actors. This is a waste of film and money.
107 out of 117 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The stuff between the credits was the problem area.
spambag15 February 2019
The opening credits were fairly sparse and went by nicely, and the ending credits had many words and names. I noticed most of the words were also spelled correctly. In between the beginning and ending credits there was a bunch of stuff that really could have been cut from the movie. Many of the scenes had people in them, and were in color. They exist in a sort of Adventure Time universe where reality is constantly changing - either that or the plot make no sense. No spoilers here, it's what the title implies: ship driving around the ocean, bashes into a big hunk of ice while frantically driving away from it, and hilarity ensues. If this was a high school project, I would say it deserved at least a B. As long as it wasn't a senior high school project.

Funniest quote: "The lifeboats are death traps!" - said by a guy in a chopper who obviously knew this in advance.
21 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This is the worst excuse for a movie!
matthewgraygubler_cm30 December 2010
Here's a run-down of this awful film. 1. Lifeless expression 2. Wooden acting 3. Laughable CGI 4. Horrible score 5. Inconsistencies galore 6.No research went into this movie which just makes it even worse. If you're going to make an attempt at a sequel to the Titanic, at least give some sort of tribute to your film's and ship's predecessor. 7.Worst sets imaginable. 8. The characters do not have any sort of chemistry. It's like their just spouting lines, not really caring who they say them to.

Run away from this movie! It will be the worst 1.5 hours of your life and you can't get them back!
24 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the' best worst films of all time'
motoconnell28 January 2012
This has to be one of the best worst films of all time. I have seen better special effects in Boris Karloff films and that is when Boris Karloff was a young man. Some of the iceberg scenes must have been shot by somebody in a bathtub/Jacuzzi having a few jars, spilled his/her ice cubes and then took a few snaps with a mobile phone. I am delighted I saw this film, I am getting great 'mileage' out of reading the reviews to my wife, I have to stop every now and again of course because the pain in our sides from uncontrolled laughing is nearly as bad as having appendicitis. I always thought Bob Hope, Danny Kaye, and Gerry Lewis starred in some of the funniest movies ever made, I was right up until now. I hope your readers find this review helpful.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This movie changed my life
svanness7 May 2018
I was a lazy boi with no aspirations and now that I have seen this film I will probably never leave my couch because I am continuously rewinding the film and playing it over and over again. I have finally found my purpose in life and will forgo all of those silly dreams, like marriage, family, friendship, and love in order to persue my higher calling - memorizing every line in this beautiful creation until I can talk solely in quotes from Titanic II whenever I talk to the friends I no longer have. Thank you, Asylum. Your namesake is where I will soon call home.
32 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hilarious!
lollypopples14 November 2010
I know this film wasn't supposed to be funny, but it completely was! the acting (appalling), the effects (terrible) and the complete lack of general knowledge from the writers or directors made this film a complete laugh riot; one of my favourite examples being a scene involving using a credit card to stop a wound bleeding, ha ha :) if you watch this film expecting to something along the lines of a half decent, respectable movie, then you will be disappointed. go in ready to take the pi$$ and ull have as much fun watching it as i did (especially if u watch with a friend!) recommend for all those who like to mock!
43 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This film is so bad that its good.
matt-285510 September 2010
I just happened to stumble across this when flicking through the channels. the title of the movie immediately suggests that it is going to be bad.

The acting is wooden, the CGI is terrible and the plot is far fetched but I just could not stop watching it.

There are lots of scenes where people are pretending to interact. There are lots of scenes when a plastic boat goes past, lots of studio shots. I think you get the message.

I really suggest you watch this. When you do please watch it for what it is. Don't take it seriously and you will find it rather amusing. Take it seriously and you will be seriously disappointed.
78 out of 89 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
'Birdemic' On Ice
DANEMOD3 October 2010
I think my title says it all - this alleged movie is so inept, so cheaply made and so poorly written and acted that I'm not sure anyone could find nice things to say about it. I could almost understand this blatant rip-off of James Cameron's film if it had been made in 1997 or 1998; at that time, all you had to do was to say "Titanic" and people automatically reached for their wallets. But this is thirteen years later, and there's just no excuse for what is on the screen here. Horrendous CG (the birds in 'Birdemic' are masterpieces compared to some of what's in 'Titanic II'), goshawful acting (the guy who played Maine should have been billed as Ed Wooden), and a general contempt for the audience make this one a must-miss. On the evidence of this film, inmates are definitely running The Asylum.
47 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another awful film from The Asylum that should be sunk without trace.
poolandrews27 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Titanic II starts exactly one hundred years after the launch & sinking of the original Titanic in 1912, in 2012 a new luxury cruise liner christened the Titanic II is about to set sail on her maiden voyage across the Atlantic. Meanwhile in Greenland a huge ice glazier has fallen apart & a huge tsunami caused by the huge iceberg crashing into the Ocean smashes straight into the Titanic II after it's engines blow. Rapidly sinking, badly damaged & with an even bigger tsunami on it's way the Titanic II & those aboard look doomed to suffer the same fate as the previous Titanic one hundred years before...

Written & directed by Shane Van Dyke who also stars in the thing this is yet another shameless rip-off from The Asylum who specialise in conning people into renting or buying their crappy films with copycat artwork, titles & plots. Here with Titanic II The Asylum are obviously leeching off the success of James Cameron's epic Titanic (1997) although this 'Mockbuster' & 'Disasterpiece' is more similar to something like Poseidon (2006) with the majority of the running time devoted to the sinking of the Titantic II, attempts to escape alive & various problems that go against the main character's. As one would expect from anything made by The Asylum Titanic II is total crap, an awful script that doesn't even get going until the fortieth minute (that's when the first tsunami hits) & a second half that has two people run through a few slightly wet corridors trying to look panicked. All the old disaster film clichés come out, at one point people even get stuck in an elevator & a door won't open because something is blocking it from the other side. Also, stop me if this sounds familiar, it seems big business has put profits first rather than human safety by cutting corners on the construction of the Titanic II. That's the best the script can do, that's as original as it gets & while the script obviously tries to mirror the events surrounding the sinking of the original Titanic it's slow going & it's impossible to care about anything. I suppose the script could have tried to say something about the dangers of global warning & the polar ice caps melting but it merely uses the iceberg thing to parallel the original sinking & the tsunami or it's after effects are never mentioned or seen again once it's hit the Titanic II.

As one would expect the CGI computer effects are awful, the CGI Titanic II looks terrible as does the iceberg & glazier breaking up. No-one really dies on screen, with a main cast of about three the expected fatalities don't really happen. I suspect the makers never left dry land, obviously shot on sets that just look like normal building they don't even shake or tilt as the Titanic II is supposedly sinking. The whole film looks as cheap & nasty as most productions from The Asylum, the second half of the film is also really dark & it's sometimes hard to make out what is going on.

Released straight to DVD in the states (although it had premiered on TV in at least Australia & Britain before that) on August 24th in an interview the producer said Titanic II only finished filming on May 7th which gives you some indication just how quickly The Asylum get these things out & that rushed post production surely contributes to the awful CGI, bad pacing & general lousiness. The acting sucks, plain & simple & the so called emotional bit at the end is embarrassingly bad.

Titanic II is awful, then again coming from The Asylum did you expect anything else? Bad CGI, bad sets, bad acting, bad script & a lot of unhappy Titanic fans who may be suckered into giving this crap a go means The Asylum's output just isn't getting any better.
37 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It might be the worst movie of all time... and I'm almost ashamed to say I enjoyed it
josh598-538-89267111 January 2011
I'm convinced this movie was made just so the lead actor (who also wrote and directed this pile of junk, by the way) could get his hands on some hot women. I honestly can't believe he got Bruce Davison to act in it.

It's almost impossible to critically review this as a "movie." The dialogue is high school drama club level, the plot is wafer thin, and some scenes that are "aboard the boat" are quite obviously shot in a hotel. The real "triumph" of this movie, however, is the CGI. Oh, the CGI. You will never complain about The Last Airbender's special effects again after seeing this movie. In some cases, special effects in 1920s movies are better.

Needless to say, I laughed out loud throughout the entire thing. You should see this movie to laugh at how bad it is, and I highly recommend seeing it with a 12-pack of your favorite frosty beverage handy.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Watch Before you Commit Suicide
marbleann14 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I have added this to it is so bad it's good collection. Why anybody in their right mind would take a trip on a ship called the Titanic 2 Christ only knows. I knew we were in trouble when I saw exactly 5 people at the dock waving the people on the ship Bon Voyage and there was only 20 people on the ship and most of them were employees. Of the passengers it looked like they rounded about 15 people from the local supermarket to do extra shots. Then we have the Statue of Liberty as a back shot when the ship is leaving port where it is clearly not NYC.

The rooms on the ship look like something you find in High School GP rooms. I understand it was the Queen Mary. I always thought that was suppose to be a nice ship but it looked pretty shabby to me. We have 3 leads the only one I know of is Bruce Davison who plays a Coast Guard Captain who daughter just happens to be a nurse on the doomed ship. He finds out that some type of Tsunami is going through the North Atlantic pushing icebergs into the ocean and destroying all things in its path. This time there is enough lifeboats but they are death traps..according to Capt Bruce. The science is something that should of been left for a better movie then this. Why bother. Who cares just sink the ship and get over with it.

It looked like they had some interesting scenes underwater involving a submarine but the lighting was so bad I could hardly make out what was happening. Then we had endless scenes of the 12 passengers dying in various places. And the daughter and her boyfriend who happens to own the ship escaping. We think he is a jerk but he turns out to be a nice guy which makes it worse. At least he could of been a weasel and we could be rooting for his death. I couldn't care. All I cared about is why is Bruce Davidson doing this movie. Does he really need the money or is he a trooper who will take on any role.

If you are mad at yourself and is considering suicide look at this movie and see how bad it is to waste your life even for 90 minutes. I gave it a 3 for the science which I am sure came from a Nova episode and Bruce Davison.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Can someone please, oh please, tell me why....
paul_haakonsen26 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Alright, this is one of those movies that you know is going to suck, just by looking at the cover or hearing the title of it. I mean, "Titanic II", for real? So what were people thinking here? We take the elements from the old "Titanic" movies and throw in a pinch of "Poseidon" just for good measure. The end result will be fabulous! People couldn't be further from the truth.

"Yeah, let's make a ship in the spirit of Titanic, call it, say I don't know... I got it, Titanic II. Yeah, that's it, let's do that!" ... I can just imagine people actually saying that.

There is not enough storyline in this movie to make a weak cup of broth. It is one of the more pathetic attempts at a disaster movie in a long, long time. Now, don't get me all wrong. I have deep respect for the events that transpired on April 14th, 1912, especially because I had relatives on the Titanic. So of course, I have a historical interest in the events and the boat, and as such have seen the previous Titanic movies. But this was just trying to cash in on the major blockbuster from 1997 with DiCaprio back in the day.

Throughout the movie there are lots of really bad continuity errors, and lots of things and events that just make you want to pull out your hair by the root. While I was watching this movie, my cat was resting on my lap, and at one point he got up and left the room. I swear it was in protest because of this movie.

One of the worst errors in the movie, was when they ran down towards the infirmary, and they were running inside a stairwell area of a building. What boat would have concrete walls? Come on... And when they did get to the infirmary, the best thing to patch up an injury was a credit card and 2 strips of tape? Seriously?

Now, what made this movie bearable to sit all the way through, for me at least, was the performance of Bruce Davison. He, and he alone, carried this movie. Now, I am not saying that the other actors and actresses performed badly, but they didn't even reach Davison to the knees.

Also, in favor of the movie, lots of the effects weren't all that shabby to look at. And I say "lots of the effects" not "all of the effects", because some were, well dubious.

And also, in the case of an event such as that, wouldn't you think more wheels would be set in motion? You sit with a very empty feel throughout this movie, like something major is missing. And something is indeed missing - a plausible story and people actually acting accordingly in a crisis situation like that one presented in the movie.

If you, like me, liked any or all of the 'older' Titanic movies, do not sit down with a serious mind to sit through this movie. It feels like a slap to the face with a wet glove. I suspect that the movie might be good if you are entirely unfamiliar with the tragedy of Titanic and the events of Poseidon, but for the rest of us enlightened people, this just doesn't have any meaning to it.

There are times in your life that you wish you could go back and do things differently. Trust me, after this movie, you wish you could do just that.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
perfectly terrible-loved it
taralunn31 December 2019
I discovered this film by accident, I read the reviews... I could not help but get some munchies and persuade my poor partner to watch it also.... It was TERRIBLE... but I absolutly LOVED it. The aweful CGI, the shockingly ripped off story line, the bland characters ... but somehow it worked... I even shed a tear at some parts... all in all ... if you want to entertain yourself, have a laugh and see what computer games from the 80's and 90's are like then give it a go. Hey, it can not be that bad as my boyfriend didn't dump me for making him watch it
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The WORST movie I have ever seen!
maxileech26 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Well, where do I begin.......... The awful CGI, the awful acting, the awful plot. The acting and the plot is just so unbelievably bad that I was left almost speechless after watching this god-awful excuse for a movie. The in-flight refuelling scene is a classic! And the submarine running into the initial tsunami......what a joke. The only good thing about this movie is that it's so bad, it's funny! Take my advice, don't watch this movie if you are sober / straight / not high. In fact, my advice would be to get bent, in fact, GET SERIOUSLY BENT and then THEN watch this movie, then you will really appreciate this shocker of a movie.

MaX
30 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This is an awful film
HALs_eyeball13 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The plot (such as it is) of this film has nothing whatsoever to do with James Cameron's Titanic. The title relates to a cruise ship called Titanic II. So having cleared that up, what is this film about? Rich kid, Hayden Walsh (Shane Van Dyke, who also wrote and directed) with more money than sense, builds a ship that looks exactly like the 1912 version. But inside, it is completely different, including turbo powered engines that can run at speeds up to 50 knots. Meanwhile, scientist Dr Kim Patterson (Brooke Burns) studying the effects of global warming on the Greenland ice sheet discovers a crack in the ice. Just as she is explaining this to top scientist James Maine (a sleepwalking Bruce Davison), the ice breaks. The tidal wave is enormous and moving at 850 miles per hour. It sweeps icebergs in its path. A Navy submarine is destroyed. The Titanic II tries to outrun it, but the engines overheat and it is stranded. An iceberg smashes into the side and it starts to sink. Half of the lifeboats are unusable so it's women and children only.

There are so many things that are wrong with this film, that it would be impossible to name them without sounding pedantic. One example: This ship is said to be following the same path as the original. Titanic left Europe in 1912, travelling West. Titanic II leaves New York, travelling East. The cast are uniformly bad. They act as if they are really not trying. Many of them would look bad in a daytime soap. The direction is very poor, many shots of people talking on deck were filmed on an actual ship, but shot from a very low angle with no camera movement so you don't see the background. The effects are the worst I have ever seen, the CGI ship is so bad they'd have been better with an actual model in a water tank.

As someone who has an interest in the Titanic story, this film was a monumental disappointment. As a piece of harmless entertainment, it failed miserably because it was simply terrible. It's worth saying that some films are so bad they are funny, this is not one of those, this is simply a really bad film that has nothing to merit it at all. Do not watch. I only wish I could have given it zero stars.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A quintessential cinematic revelation!
sylvanusz529 April 2012
This film brought tears of uncompromising elation to my eyes. It was undoubtedly one of the most illuminating movie viewing experiences of my life. James Cameron's adaptation of the tragic story ended too soon, and was far too hindered by factual ethics. An 800mph tsunami in the north Atlantic and explosions are far more visually gratifying than a cliché collision with an ice burg. Coupled with a wholehearted call for awareness for environmental issues for the icecaps of Greenland and a graphic and scientifically based depiction of the very likely outcome of our continued environmental apathy and negligence. This film touched me on a spiritual level. Titanic II is similar to the story of Christ, expressing the true selfless nature of man. This film has changed all of my expectations for future films, this movie may have bested the birthing of Jesus and will give the second coming of Christ a run for its money. Jesus had better hire Michel Bay for special effects if he wishes to best this masterpiece.
57 out of 92 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So bad, it's good!
kieranpadwick18 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This was on TV so i decided to check it out... i am a fan of really low budget films, especially the ones which are so bad that their good. This is definitely one of them. It's low on the list, but it's one of them.

If you go into this and take it too seriously you probably wouldn't enjoy it. If you want a sequel to James Cameron's Titanic, its not that either. It should be treated as a bit of fun...

The special effects are hilariously bad, with terrible CGI and awfully chroma keyed composite shots. The acting is a tad bit iffy, especially from the extras. In one scene the passengers are so panicked that they can't even run to the lifeboats without falling over. It's over the top, which every action movie should be. We have a strong male lead who at the start seems a bit of jerk but actually becomes likable as the move goes along. One of Titanic II's redeeming features was the excellent music, it was dramatic and emotional. It really helped to set the scene, when the actors, story and special effects couldn't.

If you liked Poseidon or similar movies, you may like this. Just don't take it too seriously.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible. Just terrible.
beybes_088 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a fan of Titanic - possibly because I'm was a hopeless romantic and my version of good about 8 years ago was anything that made me cry.

But this movie is just terrible. After years of watching movies, comparing movies and seeing awfully made, awfully directed movies and movies that are just AWFUL, I am speechless at this movie.

Effects are unbelievable, plot line is disturbing and acting is PAINFUL! I don't know how there's going to be a Titanic 3 when this so-called sequel is too painful to watch.

The main characters don't have chemistry at all and do not even have any screen presence in the first place.

Take my advice when you see this playing on TV: RUN! CHANGE CHANNELS! GO TO BED! Anything but watch!
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed