Assault on Wall Street (2013) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
149 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
An film that fills with so much emotions that its flaws are easily overlooked.
recollectionY1 June 2013
I am compelled to write this review because I am completely disgusted by all those biased reviews written by people who let their predisposed opinions about the director or the actor dictate their feeling towards the film. I am not a fan of Uwe Boll but I don't agree with a lot of the nasty stuff people put out there. I know people are entitled to their opinion but I also know that we can become better at what we do.

With all that said, I was genuinely surprised by the amount of emotion put into this film. The acting was superb. Dominic Purcell does a great job playing an average individual, Jim, a loving husband who is desperately trying to survive in a world full of greed. It is hard for anyone not to feel for Jim as injustice and greed gradually consumes his everything and pushes him closer and closer into the world of evil. Erin Karpluk does a great job portraying a loving wife whose unfortunate destiny is worsened by the flaws of capitalism. All others minor characters all did their best to help the audience understand the difference between good and evil. I don't understand why people think Dominic Purcell is a bad actor, I really think he is one of the few action stars who can be tough yet full of emotions at the same time.

While there were no major flaws in acting, the plot does suffer some major setbacks. Since I don't want to spoil anything, let me just say I didn't think any of those was a major distraction to the movie but they were somewhat noticeable. Overall, the story might be a bit too straightforward to some people and the ending twist which may or may not fit everyone's taste, the great acting should keep you entertained throughout.

Quick note, if you are watching it with a kid, please make sure to explain the role of violence and the importance of consequence and blah blah blah. This movie can be too deep for kids.

To conclude, please watch this movie with an open mind. Do not blindly hate it because of Uwe Boll's history as a director and do not love it simply because of it's an bloody revenge towards Wall Street greed.
94 out of 108 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Uwe Boll! you did it this time.
waqarr4012 May 2013
Uwe Boll is known as one of the worst directors ever known to be in the film industry for making movies for big budgets and making absolutely nothing back from them.hes hated by all the directors in Hollywood and is mocked by people all over the world.his last few movies have been universally panned by critics all of them adapted from popular video games.after owners of well known game metal gear solid refused to sell the rights to Uwe Boll because his history as a director.

i think he finally woke up and smelled the smoke because his latest film Assault on wall street is actually good.The film stars Dominic Purcell and Erin Karpluk .the film starts as Jim a security guard for an armored truck who is struggling to pay for his ill wife who is recovering from cancer and Jim must find ways to pay for his wife's treatment after his disastrous investment his stockbroker advised him to make.he soon looses everything he has and decides to take extreme measures to get revenge on the rich and greedy people who got him into the situation hes in.although the film starts off slow it somehow manages to keep you interested and you sympathize with Jim and actually start to root for him even though you know what hes doing is wrong.it picks up near the end and to be honest it impressed me even though Uwe Boll has gone really dark for this one.with a A+ performance by Dominic Purcell and Erin Karpluk

this is a film Uwe Boll can actually be proud of and not have to worry about being universally panned.many people will watch this movie and give it a bad review just because of Uwe Boll past and because they quite frankly don't like him or his methods but thats not what film is about.the film is a huge improvement over his previous films and all i can say is Uwe Boll keep it up stay away from the video game adapt ions and concentrate on your own work.now I'm not saying this film is amazing but it is a damn good film.6.5/10
116 out of 144 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent Flick!
jdgmarine122 May 2013
I actually liked this movie. I agree with what Dominic Purcells character stood for, and I rooted for him the entire time. He's kind of a modern day hero. I read most of the user reviews before I watched, and I was kind of ifey about watching it. But I must say, most of the users were pretty harsh on the movie and Uwe Boll, the director. Uwe Boll did a good job with this flick, Good characters, whom are all pretty well known actors, good locations, and great filmography. Although, there were a few scenes that made me shake my head and think, "Nope, wouldn't happen like that." Or, a scene just played out kind of silly, But overall, I enjoyed it and I would recommend it.
42 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pigs are flying....Uwe Boll has made a good film! --^--6.8/10--^--
Thrill_KillZ10 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Well everyone, it seems as though we should all remove a dagger from the heart of Uwe for now at least. Assault on Wall Street comes forth with none of the all too familiar flaws that most movie fans are accustomed to with his work. Not only does this come across with good cinematography, superb editing & a very effective score, but it delivers many good acting performances by a cast made up mostly by actors who are normally not so effective.

Dominic Purcell(Prison Break) plays Jim, an armored car guard and loving husband to his wife Rosie, who happens to become seriously ill. This event starts a chain reaction of bad events in Jim's life, first his health insurance gets capped, days later he finds out his lifetime investments are now gone due to crooked business practices. Now, unable to pay for the proper medical treatment for Rosie he embarks on a desperate mission to find a solution, only to be left alone with nothing but revenge on his mind.

This is such a common story here in the US which makes the film that much more real to the audience. You'd be hard pressed to find a person that hasn't either had a family member who has lost their retirement or known someone who hasn't gotten screwed in some way by an unscrupulous investment company between 9/11 to date. This factor made the plot hit home in a very believable manner. Match that with good pacing and you have yourself a pretty entertaining film to watch. --^--6.8/10--^--
71 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Want truth? Watch this. Want entertainment only? Do not watch.
ymom11-684-75572613 May 2013
There is a lot of truth in this movie. I do not care if you are Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, or other, if you listen closely the rants and the facts in the background of the movie should ring true. We are all slaves to the system and also the "old money" described in one of the later rants. However, remember that many middle or even high level employees and owners of Wall Street have no idea they work for a corrupt system.

I believe that the acting and atmosphere were solid, especially for a low budget movie. However, the movie was a bit romanticized and unrealistic.

I would recommend this movie to someone who is yearning for a better understanding of politics, money in general, and who wants to also be mildly entertained. I would not recommend this movie to anyone who watches for the sole purpose of being entertained, it cannot compete with other movies in terms of pure entertainment value.
122 out of 175 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
V on Wall Street
in198412 May 2013
7.25 of 10. This is essentially V for Vendetta set in the present/recent past and without the sci-fi, alternate reality aspect. It could easily be a true story.

The story and direction keep it feeling real for the most part outside of a key point that's frustrating because it happens too fast and is an overly simplistic, accelerated series of events. It may feel that way intentionally for mood setting or because the film slowly sets the stage. Nonetheless, it's not a good idea for a film to go from a slow, detailed time-line to weeks/months flying by then back again.

The everyday, real character setups and contrasts along with the irony of guns vs. Wall Street make the film work. The characters aren't required to do anything the relatively average actors can't handle, so there's no need to worry about the lack of big names. Instead, it helps keep the film believable. There are also some enjoyably truth-is-stranger-than-fiction type scenes where music is seamlessly woven in to create for some needed laughs in a film that's mostly serious drama.
50 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A soldier of the people?.....
FlashCallahan11 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Jim is living a peaceful life with a decent paying job and a loving family.

Everything changes when the economy crashes causing Jim to lose everything.

Filled with anger and rage, Jim snaps and goes to extreme lengths to seek revenge for the life, and potential good life, taken away from him......

If I ever wanted to change the name of a film, it would have to be this one, and I would call it 'The Unluckiest Man In The World', because, wow, does he have some poor luck.

He loses money, lots of it, and because of this, he loses his job, and when John Connor gives him $10,000 (easy money), he hires the Lesser known Roberts sibling, who wastes his money anyway.

And to top it all off (no pun intended), his cancer suffering wife takes her own life, because she doesn't want to bother him with her illness.

And I'm sure it happens in the space of a couple of days.......

Its a lot to take in, and because of all his bad luck, the most feasible of Bolls films becomes more of the same, and even though I've grown tolerant of his film style and motivational coaching, the exploitation part if the film seems pretty pointless because of the maundering build up.

Lessen the bad luck, have the wife healthy and run away with the guy who lost ll his money, and then we'd have a proper exploitation revenge flick, with a message of the dangers of playing with your life savings and your marriage.

The twist at the end is pretty clever, but it's be more convincing if Purcell wasn't cast as the lead (no offence to the man, he puts in a great performance).

All in all. Its a pretty bland affair, offering too little too late.

Stick with Rampage, for a decent, shocking Boll film.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good movie, watch it.
blizz00710 July 2013
Not what i expected, in a good way. This is not just a "run and gun" movie. I find this movie to be comparable to "Falling Down" from 1993, or Law "Abiding Citizen" 2009. Only a bit better! I would give both those movies 7, i give this 8.

The reason for this is the build up, or rather the hard hitting decline. It is not only hard hitting, but it is highly relevant and indeed, highly believable. The acting is good, Erin Karpluk does an excellent role, and really gave me a "puch in the heart". Eric Roberts does the slick lawyer very well indeed. Dominic Purcell does a good job, but i have a bit of an issue there. There is a bit to much "stoneface" going on. If this is due to the actor or the director is probably a discussion for the learned of such things. But he carries the movie well.

Im looking at Uwe Bolls movie list and i have seen six or seven of his over 30 movies, so i am no expert. If you look the Bloodrayne series it is quit entertaining, but they don't mean anything, if you catch my drift. I find Assault on Wallstreet to be quite a different animal. Yes there is shooting, executions and blood. But this time the "scenery" is different, it is relevant.

Assault on wallstreet surprised me and therefor i might be overly entusiastic by giving an 8, but i do recommend this movie. Yes you might "have seen it before".. Well let me tell you, i have seen Superman, Spiderman, Avenge me this and Avenge me that so many times that the my eyeballs starts to bleed by just accidentally seeing the commercials for the bloody things.. OK, the new Spiderman was better than the last one, but thats besides the point! (cough cough)

I say give it a go :)

Appreciate a yes or no for helpfullness, so i know if there is a reason for me to writing these comments.
142 out of 170 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A solid B movie with a clear theme
fxdx415 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
If you look at the poster and are looking for a war or action movie, better move along. There is no real violence until about the 3/4 mark of the movie. Also, if you are looking for acting (other than John Heard) then keep moving along, cause you won't find that here either. Ohh yeah, and when the action does come it about as poorly shot as a 80's cop show.

With that said, I did enjoy the movie. What is there to enjoy in a movie that has poor acting, and action? Well, it is somewhat cathartic. I did feel the rage against Wall Street and feel the egos of those responsible for pain big company execs caused millions of people.

While this is not a well directed movie, there are numerous poorly cut scenes, and odd directorial choices, it is a well told story. You feel for the main character (Duminic Purcell), and the assortment of B (or B- ) actors are fun to watch as they get ancient (Edward Furlong, Keith David, Eric Roberts). As the problems pile up the audience starts to see the troubles the 'little guy' faces, and there are some touching moments between of friendship and family.

When the action finally does get going, the movie has kind of run its course and it is less than satisfying. We know there is going to be a blood bath, and we know it can only end in one of two ways – neither of which is going to really make sense – it doesn't.

So you may ask why I give this a 7. Well, sometimes you have all the ingredients for a good cake and it flops. This is kind of the opposite. This should be a terrible movie, bad acting, directing, poor action that devolves into a silly plot. And if you look at it piece by piece it is. But, with that said, I enjoyed it. Just remember, you are not watching an action film, just one with a clear thesis: Wall Street is Voldemort, Satan, Sauron and Hitler all rolled into one. Maybe I agree.
25 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Uwe Boll always lives up to his poor reputation
I was nearly speechless, after i had forced my self to finish this movie.

At least in many of his other movies, i could complete them because i could at least enjoy some of the effects and action...

Nope, not in this one...

Sure the quality of image is good, the actors are great... but the way it's written, it's been cut, and put together, just ends up, not being the movie it shows on the poster.

It's like he chose to spend 1+ hour on the first act, and then hurry through the rest of the acts to complete this movie. The movie is soooo overdone and wrongly cut, i would use this as one of the worst examples on how to setup and cut a movie. I mean it's sooo repetitive. The first hour, keeps telling us the same thing, over and over and over again.

I have no idea how it has gotten such high reviews here, as it does not deserve it. And i can only give it a 3 out of 10, because of the quality images and the acting...

If they had made a C list director like Lloyd Kauffmann direct this, it would have been 10 times better...

Uwe, when are you going to learn to make good movies?
23 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A movie in the vein of Falling Down. A normal man is pushed too far and does things you only dream of. I say A-.
cosmo_tiger19 June 2013
"The real criminals are downtown on Wall Street wearing suits that cost more then any of us make in a year and they steal more money the anyone on Rikers Island ever dreamed of." Jim Baxford (Purcell) is a hard working man with a very sick wife. When advice he took ends with him losing all his money when the stock market tanked his life begins to spiral out of control. When he loses everything he snaps, and no one is safe. This is a movie that will make you feel many different types of emotions, mostly anger. An everyman gets screwed over and the bad news seems to pile on him again and again and finally does what some have only dreamed of. This is another movie that I do not advocate what he does, but it sure is fun to watch. This movie reminded me a lot of Falling Down in the way that that character also snapped and does things that I have always wanted to. By the time he snaps you really feel for him and are almost happy he does. I really liked this and I recommend the movie highly. Overall, one of the best B movies I have seen and Uwe Boll's best movie to date. I give this an A-.
78 out of 97 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better than expected.
matty24109010 July 2013
Not a bad movie at all. I was surprised as most people writing reviews and commenting on the boards who were going into this film with very little or without any expectations at all.

It started rather slow and with no stand out scenes in the first 30 minutes or so whilst the plot and characters were being established. If it wasn't for pretty decent performances from the main stars then I don't think I would have made it past the 30 minute mark. Thankfully I kept watching and as the story progressed I found myself becoming more engaged.

I felt the politics and financial information was explained in just the right detail for someone who isn't aware of what goes on in Wall Street.

Jim Baxford (Dominic Purcell) who is a loyal and caring husband of Rosie Baxford (Erin Karpluk) finds himself pushed over the edge as he loses things closest to him due to financial investments gone wrong. He seeks revenge on those responsible using his ex military skills.

Co stars Edward Furlong, Keith David and Michael Paré play Jims buddies and try and help him out best they can even if it comes to turning a blind eye when things start to take a serious turn.

Overall i think Uwe Boll has actually broke his streak of bad movies and delivered a decent movies, so don't write him off just yet and give this a watch. I think you will be pleasantly surprised. 6.5/10
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Violence with absolutely no redeeming value
peterguitar15 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The reviews that call this the best have to be from people with an emotional short circuit in their make up or a stake in this movie. The acting, the story and the pacing are all so predictable as to be outrageously insulting. The overwhelming pile up of the bad things that happen to the lead character could have led to a great cathartic ending if there were a point to any of it. When I watch an action/revenge movie such as this I enter into an unspoken agreement with the director and writer that is something like "you keep me reasonably hypnotized and in the moment of your story and I'll suspend belief and turn off the judging part of my brain". The acting, writing and directing are so bad that I never got to turn the judge-ey part of my brain off.

"Bad stuff happened" is in no way a justification for the unbridled and completely amoral killing of total innocents. This movie has no moral center. It's just disgraceful. The blood thirsty climactic violence should be focused tightly on executing (pun intended) said death, mayhem, and cataclysm on the BAD GUYS, not on an office full of men and women that are just doing their 9 to 5 thing. I am in no way an apologist for the scum sucking leeches that came out of the financial crisis with their fortunes not only fully intact, but much larger than before by a few orders of magnitude, all at the expense of the rest of us.

However, the fact that there are people out there that think this movie shows a righteous everyman giving it to the man - instead of an unhinged, murderous, slug with no conscience wreaking senseless havoc - scares me. He has clearly gone mad. No, I take that back. There is no attempt to show him "snapping" and losing it. He is shown as an intensely mean and calculating monster. No amount of "YEAH! GIVE IT TO 'EM!!" blood lust excuses what he's done. He needs to be put down, not signed up for a sequel.

Again, no moral center, no redeeming value.
16 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Predictable but not a bad movie
sgroyle9 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The credibility of the set up for the last third of the movie was very well done. From the beginning where hope was established, to the steady way in which 'with patience and saliva the elephant screws the ant', was well-paced, and believable; the bonding of the "little" people - the other 99% was a nice touch - mainly because it reflected real life.

The climax too had its moments. A nice, non-too-subtle, homage to 'Taxi Driver' with DeNiro, (in this movie our protagonist is practicing his fast draw in a mirror and the next scene opens with a taxi door - the word "Taxi" there for us all to get the reference).

For me the ending was too contrived ymmv. I appreciated the "twist" but came away feeling it was less than plausible. Any Wall Street types I know would be on their knees begging forgiveness and offering up their first born rather than having a rant about how the rich will always screw the poor and that's the American Way.

Likewise the fact that his buddies were there at the end. I get that they were NY Cops, but NY cops have precincts and they were way out of theirs.

All in all a solid movie that isn't a waste of your time. Poignant movements delivered well and if you can suspend your belief for a little while the ending could be satisfying for you.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Uwe Boll did something good at last ;) Enjoyable.
nexus-377 July 2013
I kind of randomly watched this one by rating and year, the plot also was so simplified so I got interested and not too long.

In the beginning I was amazed to see Uwe Boll the as director and so, didn't really wait anything watchable after that. But I did.

I actually don't get any Uwe Boll movies they are just... So Uwe. This was different.

Good actors, great acting, great direction, simple enough story that wont bore you and funny ending guaranteed.

Dominic Purcell was of course other reason to watch this one, never seen anything really stupid from him as an actor.

Glad that I saw this, recommended if you want to have some not too long movie for night, little drama action and comedy.

7/10
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I'm still alive and free and I promise I will keep killing.
lastliberal-853-25370813 October 2013
Dominic Purcell and Erin Karpluk deliver performances that belong in a better movie.

The idea that Wall Street engaged in criminal activity and was bailed by the Government is not new. The real criminals walk free with big bonuses, and the people are bankrupt and penniless.

I found it totally funny that a priest was using Psalm 18 at a funeral in the midst of this. It was a call to action. What else can you do when your have lost everything?

All the action takes place in the last third f the movie, but the first part was necessary to set it up. You could see the rage building, and the revenge was sweet. Didn't expect the ending.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Great idea, badly executed.
marc-89521 July 2013
No pun intended in the title there but seriously, Dominic Purcell really attend acting school?

I'm no fan of Uwe Boll either so I found myself questioning why I was even watching this - but I did sit through it all; marvelling at the waste of respectable talent (John Heard, Keith David, even Michael Pare) while Dominic Purcell mumbles his way through banal dialogue and predictable - even poorly paced plot with predictable outcomes.

A better director (Boll's screenplay has the right idea) and a believable star could have made this a half-decent film with a powerful message.

As it is, Purcell just menaces his way from shot to shot and delivers a cringe worthy performance that is so bad it makes Steven Segal look like a classically trained Shakespearean player. He really is that bad.
14 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Finally, a revenge on Wallstreet movie
tom-810-1500819 July 2013
Over the years there have been a few movies and documentaries telling the stories of big-bank-victims, as I prefer to call them. Movies like 'Margin Call', and documentaries like 'Inside Job'. Both movies tried to give a (somewhat), reconstruction of what happened during the crisis. Thank god, someone finally wrote a script about taking revenge on Wallstreet and Uwe Boll did a great job executing it. Certainly, the movie delivers on the title, Assault On Wallstreet.

The elements such as casting, cinematography and emotions are all surprisingly good, especially for a movie directed by Uwe Boll. To be honest, this director had managed to make a train wreck out of promising movies in the past, this being far from it. Foremost, the feeling of injustice and frustration for Jim Baxford (acted perfectly by Dominic Purcell), really gets under your skin. Also, news program quotes during the movie add a great effect about the message of anger of the people versus the big banks and CEO's directing them. All of this has been filmed and edited perfectly, meaning there is no moment when it's distracting because of CGI, or other trickery.

When I picked the movie, I expected a full-out action movie based on the poster. However I was surprised by the depth of the movie and action fans might get disappointed by the lack of action, it actually skips through most of it. But, the climax of the movie certainly delivered both action as story wise.
47 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Courageous Movie if not a bit unrealistic
faramirjcb13 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Kudos for the producers of this film to portray the violence the way they did. Will turn some off, but I enjoyed it.

Of course the plot is a little thin and far fetched. But we get to finally feel a little bit angry again at what the politically connected Wall Street did to so many of us.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Poorly written, badly directed, bleakly acted - don't recommend this one
sentient-cabbage16 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I've made it a bit of a principle to steer clear of anything with Uwe Boll on the poster, but after reading a few of the reviews from other IMDb users, I decided to once more give him the benefit of the doubt. Big mistake.

The narrative is so ridiculously obvious that it makes your head hurt after watching for just a few minutes, but the film keeps on painting this utterly one-dimensional picture of the beautiful and hard-working American couple who are victimized by the evil and greedy bankers. First goes the investments, then the health insurance, then the job, then the house, and then someone dies ... and now it's payback time (one man, out for revenge!).

Anyone who has anything to do with the financial services industry are vilified and then later gunned down in a banker conspiracy theory nut's wet dream. Secretaries and office clerks are just as valid targets as CFOs and CEOs.

The acting is thin and strained, the characters are cardboard stereotypes, the story not very believable and at the end of it all, the glorification of a mass-shooting just left me with a bad taste in my mouth.

There is nothing new or improved here, in comparison with other Uwe Boll films. I suspect the only reason other people are giving it any kind of decent rating, is simply because they enjoy the subject matter of someone taking "justice" to Wall Street ... indulging in some kind of murder fantasy that is frankly disgusting to watch.
22 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An action movie addressing a real issue
empireofred12 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
9/10

I really enjoyed the whole movie from the first to the last minute. Don't expect the whole 97 minutes to be packed with action though. In the beginning it's about real financial problems people have due to the banks' way of doing business. A married couple invested its savings in a mutual fund which went bad, and ended up having their house foreclosed. Jim (Dominic Purcell) tried to fight it legally but it only got worse and worse until he lost his wife (she killed herself). After seeing the incompetence of the justice system and how the rich only got richer while only the average person like himself suffered he decided to kill the people responsible. The action kicks in relatively late in the film, however the interactions and emotions that led to Jim's desperation in the end are necessary in order to justify his actions. This film shows how we are only words and numbers on a piece of paper for the banks, and that they will stop at nothing to profit. As I see it the part before the action begins is how many people have been treated in real life, and the part where he goes ballistic is what many of those regular people who were robbed of their life would like to do.

To conclude, I also noticed that this film wasn't made in Hollywood. Hmm...let me think... neither was V for Vendetta... is it a coincidence?
41 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Revenge never is an answer
annuskavdpol27 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Assault on Wallstreet is a good story of the depth of the stock-market and how it influences the local citizens. This is a good story revealing how it must be for the little man and how the little man loses all while the financial elite continue to live a high quality of life on Wall-Street. The male lead character is not happy being a poor man as the rich get richer. This movie shows the emotion, anger and pain it feels like to be helpless in a seemingly rigged financial USA system. The depth that the lead male character goes through is intense, as he does not stop with one mishap (the assault and taxi hit and run situation). This movie is able to bring a human face to the financial crisis. Perhaps that is what the director intended on doing. The message came loud and clear to me: for some life deals a raw hand of cards.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Twist at ending.
ddojl10 May 2013
Starts out slow, ends up fast. 6.2/10

Through a combination of naiveté and other factors tragedy strikes in the life of a young couple. Financial difficulties mount.

The protagonist is a likable hard working guy that ends up beaten by circumstances beyond his control and decides to do something about it.

Supporting characters are likable enough but no substantial ancillary plots are developed.

The hero takes his revenge, with military precision and at the end there is a very satisfying plot twist.

Caution: Don't like blood....don't watch movie!!
11 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I don't understand..
marcus_andersson24 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I don't understand how this movie can get so many good reviews in here. The movie is building up a hate against the US financial system and the people on wall street that take no blame for making mistakes that affects common people.

I get that. I also hate these people.

And I even get and feel good about the main character shooting his stockbroker who put him in this situation.

But then? He moves on and shoot like 50 other people in the same building. They probably have families, wives and kids waiting for them at home.

THAT IS A TERROR DEAD IN MY OPINION! When I saw that I did not like it at all. If the main character kills all those people is he really a better man than them? If this would happen in real life it would be called a terror attack! It is really terrible and I cant believe you guys who give this movie high rates.

It is really sad what the world have become.
15 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Living Vicariously
georgecurious03623 September 2014
What this movie offers is opium for the masses, the fact is that the bankers and politicians that master minded the horrendous recession that we are going through have gotten away with it. They will never be brought to justice. Capitalism to a country is like AIDS, once you've got it, it's never going away. One of the many problems with the current system is that corporations own the government and have absolute control of the people. They have robbed you and you have done nothing about it because you can't do anything about it. Human beings are like puppets on a string ... its really that simple.

The thing about society is that people are encouraged to have bad guys, the government created them for you, immigrants, ethnic minorities, terrorists etc you are explicitly or covertly encouraged to hate these people, while the corporations shaft you, you shaft them. Its the same deal that the Nazis had with their populations, they had absolute control over them and encouraged them to hate the Jews and blame them for everything the world ills. They'll distract you with another war in the middle east that nobody wants and by the time they've finished with you, you won't know which way is up, never mind having justice for being royally shafted.

So just crawl back into you kennels and eat your doggy treats ... here boy.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed