"The Witcher" The Cost of Chaos (TV Episode 2023) Poster

(TV Series)

(2023)

User Reviews

Review this title
40 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Farewell Henry....
Dannyboi9429 July 2023
The Witcher season 3 was, well a complete letdown as we all knew it would be. The only good things about this season were of course, Henry, Freya, the music and action scenes. The writing, directing, editing and pretty much everything else, was utter trash. You would think CW made this season.

This is the finale episode we will see of Henry and I'm glad he's leaving, especially if this series is going to keep this kind of quality. The showrunners clearly have no respect for this world and the characters within it, because this whole thing is a complete mess and has a ridiculous amount of disrespect towards the original story, the author and those you have come to love both the games, and the novels.

The editing in this episode and this season as a whole has been so bad, I would expect more from a 5 year old bashing on a keyboard. Some scenes don't merge well, some scenes have unnecessary cuts ect. This season has had dreadful directing, poor CGI. It's just a mess.

I will give praise to then main cast, as they have clearly tried their best, and they deserve better than what they have been given. The music has been good, as have the action scenes, which is why this doesn't get a 1/10. Some of the locations were stunning, and there is some really good camera work here and there. But overall, season 3 has been awful. It has betrayed the essence of the characters, had a muddle plot, poor directing and I'm glad it's ending here. I won't watch season 4 when it comes out, as I have no interest in this anymore.

This series could have been remarkable, it could have been Netflix answer to Game of Thrones, but failed in every attempt to be it's equal. Which is a shame, because in the right hands, this could have been one of the best fantasy TV shows out there.

4/10.
220 out of 236 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Goodbye Cavill, I don't blame you for leaving
pchtcjt30 July 2023
As, what is easily the worst season of The Witcher it becomes obvious as to why Cavill has left the show that he had warned of leaving if enough changes weren't made. Although some aspects of this season were more accurate to the books, other, often pivotal, aspects still deviated from the books often in weird and quite simply unnecessary ways. The pacing of this season has been all over the place making it very clear that the writers of the show really don't know what they are doing.

Although the first two seasons had there faults the quality of them was certainly greater than this third season. I am not one to say that I didn't enjoy the first two seasons. The casting was good and although there were poor choices made regarding the writing, it was clear that there was still a lot of care put into the show. However the third season almost felt a bit detached and ill thought out. I must give one positive that Yennefer seemed to be written in a more accurate way and obviously performed well by Anya.

I got into the Witcher in the past few years through the Wild Hunt Xbox game and since I have become a fan, not always fully understanding the complaints about the first two seasons but as I have delved more into the franchise I have come to realise why the long term fans that are bigger fans than myself almost feel betrayed by what the writers of the show have done to something they have loved for many years. I believe Cavill to be one of these fans which is why it makes sense that he has left the show as I am sure he became more and more frustrated. It is just a shame cause I can't imagine anyone doing a better job as Geralt. I became more of a fan of Cavill as Geralt rather than the show itself.

It may be sad to see him leave but I hope he goes on to do something that he enjoys as it will probably be an even better watch.

Good bye Cavill and good luck.
97 out of 108 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Anti-climatic ending & missed opportunity
tomas_1234528 July 2023
One thing I do not understand is why split the season into two parts if second part is so weak. You make people wait one month to be disappointed.

One forgets most of the politics from S03 part 1 as a month passed and storyline wasn't very memorable to begin with. And then we receive 2 filler episodes (E07, E08) where nothing happens and story lingers and doesn't move forward.

It ultimately feels like the show doesn't know what it wants to deliver. Is it action? (well, it's messy), is it politics as in GoT (well, they are confusing, and people's motivation behind their actions is not properly explained), is it romance? (there's not much character development so the dialogues feel out of place).

Ultimately it feels like weak scripting with bunch of angry characters running around with their agenda that is not properly explained. The story centers around Ciri and everyone chasing her yet no one trully knows what her powers are including her??. To give a show some thrill, writers occasionally throw in 1. A monster or a fight 2. Death of some of the characters (which you do not care about anyway) 3. Some cool CGI. However, it just seems the show lacks any kind of spirit or statement.

They could have built an amazing universe... It feels like the setting is there, but story got lost along the way...
50 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Huge disappointment
hasanyasinhere29 July 2023
"The Witcher" TV series faced several critical issues that hindered its overall quality and left viewers disappointed.

1. Limited Geralt Screen Time: The lack of sufficient focus on the main protagonist, Geralt of Rivia, left fans wanting more of his adventures and character development.

2. Absence of Romance: The show's failure to deliver engaging love stories or captivating romantic arcs deprived the characters of depth and emotional connections.

3. Lack of Clear Motivation: Many characters lacked a clear end goal or motivation, resulting in scattered storylines that made it hard for viewers to invest in their journeys.

4. Inconsistent Character Development: Characters frequently switched sides and underwent drastic personality changes without proper explanation, making their actions and decisions confusing and unconvincing.

5. Illogical Decision-Making: The series suffered from moments of illogical decision-making, breaking the immersion and credibility of the fantasy world.

6. Flawed Dialogue: Some dialogues felt nonsensical and lacked depth, failing to deliver the epic feel that a fantasy show of this scale demands.

These issues collectively impacted the overall storytelling and character arcs, preventing "The Witcher" TV series from reaching its full potential.

A huge disappointment.
121 out of 136 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
What a lack luster finale
minihendo27 July 2023
The direction of this finale is really quite poor the action scenes don't have a sense of weight due to the heavy use of cutting quickly. Especially the none Witcher fight scenes in the bar. If you hire stunt actors maybe let them do stunts and sell a fight rather than cutting away quickly after each hit. Really does feel like stunt coordinator was shackled by a poor vision from writers or director.

It is truly a shame that all of the actors have had to try their hardest to work with what the writers have cobbled together. Really feel like anyone who knows the source material should just avoid watching this show and keep your imagination and love of the Witcher intact.
109 out of 126 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Never read the books nor played the game...
stsorrell29 July 2023
Having never read the books nor played the game, I did enjoy this series for the most part, especially the first two seasons. Originally, the story featured a Witcher that fought monsters. It was full of magic, a little lust, and a budding romance. Then in season 3 the focus was 100% on a war. No more monsters (okay, maybe one monster). No more lust or love between Geralt and Yen. And with very few exceptions did we ever get to see much of a glimpse of this supposed power that Ciri has...which was the basis of the series to this point, wasn't it?

Again, I have no history with the story/lore, but it does seem as though the shift in focus made this a completely different story than how it began. Maybe that's why Henry wasn't happy and left. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the journey, but even I could tell that this was a little off the rails. This season finale was a big let down. Episode 6 was the high point of season 3, so I started off watching this second half with high hopes. Then the utterly boring episode 7 happened, which made me worry about episode 8. And yeah, I was correct. It was not the great send off I was expecting for Henry's departure.
30 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Stop the constant spinoffs.
emilmanning27 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
You kill a central character to end it all with, but introduce meaningless sides without conversations or plots to fill a quota or something. Yennefer and Geralt love has gone soft, and lack the lust and directness of the books.

Where is the monsters that define this universe. Stop with all the meaningless dialog with cheesy spins.

Geralt lacks his goodness "witchers don't feel" - Yennefer lacks the cold low, but also the ambition that made her a fan favorit in the games.

And triss, where is the romance with Geralt, where is the wits.. she made it fun to wonder who will end with Geralt..

And Djykstra! He seems like a powerless desperate man, he is cynical and cold, where is his ambition.. Eilhart has no magical ambition, but takes his place totally.

In general the show is missing the woods, the swamps, the monsters, the mystery, the fisety comments between main characters. Remove the sides and use all time on the central three, but mostly Geralt, he is the main.. it seems like that has been forgotten in useless dialog, new "powerfully" women, who takes a way for the female characters with depth, whom the fanbase love.

The leader of the show has failed, the show has sadly lost the parts that made the books a hit, and the games a gem that keeps on giving, and for what? Because someone wanted to write their own story in a 1/10 of the time the author did, expecting it to be a succes.
113 out of 135 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
More then decent
adriancvoinea17 August 2023
I need to preface this, I have never read the book nor play the game extensively (not enough to get into the lore). Because of that, I believe I can give an unbiased opinion.

I was very disappointed with Season 2, and wasn't looking forward for this one, but eventually I got to it, and it just worked for me

I loved the season. Except the little plot holes that appeared during Redenia's coup on Aretusa, everything felt into place.

There were some other issues, that seemed like bad editing and/or bad directing here and there, but nothing major.. And the overall story was decent, with some ok twists, and no cringe.

The only thing I'm sorry about is that they didn't gave a continuity face change story to Cavill, and he will just be replaced (?)
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
They don't deserve you Henry!
mehraddavaii31 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I only give it a 7 because of a farewell to Henry Cavil. I don't know and don't care what happened behind the scenes but nor Henry and neither the fans deserve such a bs season. Rush editing, weak storylines and plot holes that ruins it easily! I mean what was that Ciri centered episode in the middle of the desert for an hour!? No point at all! I don't think this show should be renewed at this point!

I thought I was the only one who had problems with this season but it seems Most of the Fans and of Course Henry Cavill Himself are not happy whit the outcome of this potentially Game of Thrones Rival!

Anyway Hope something else happens in season 4 and I don't really think Liam Hemsworth can save this mess!
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
"They gradually lowered the quality until we're glad it ended"
smikel-5538531 July 2023
Well, what can I say? It's an absolute mess. The entire last episode is set to make us feel like we have to watch season 4 - setting up what the show runners think we should find intriguing. I absolutely will not be watching season 4, and honestly, I wish hadn't watched season 3. The monsters that define the universe are thrown is as an after thought, the Witcher is basically included as a bit of fan service, the primary focus is on a slew of side characters. In my opinion, season 3 ranks up there as every bit as poor as season 1 of Rings of Power - at least in the case of the Witcher we got 2 good seasons before it went to hell. I will never understand this trend of show runners thinking they can produce something better than the original stories. The arrogance is astounding. The Witcher is the only reason I still have Netflix. Well, that little conundrum has been resolved.
51 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beautifully Humanized, Boldly Detailed - Season 3 Review
JoshuaMercott31 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Adapted from Andrzej Sapkowski's third novel in the series, namely "Time of Contempt", "The Witcher" S03 starring Henry Cavill started off on a high note and kept tensions taut.

Though they stayed true to the book this time round, there were a handful of creative differences that had to be followed. You can read all about the changes in "Witcher" season 3 from the books on a well-detailed article on IGN.

The eight episodes featured in this season contained plenty of crucial characters and alluring action sequences. Heart and humor were also woven into the plot, bringing balance to a lore-packed third season.

Cavill was, as expected, outstanding in the role. It's a shame to see him go. Hopefully, his 'younger Witcher' version, Liam Hemsworth will follow well in his footsteps. That remains to be seen in season 4 of "The Witcher".

I have a lot to say about Cavill's departure, but it's best to let bygones be bygones. There have been rumors about how 'difficult' he is to work with, but fans know that Cavill demands perfection and excellence. I, personally, find that empowering instead of belittling. Sadly, some others might have felt a lazier approach was the way to go.

Allow me to add that Cavill is going to be almost impossible to replace in the hearts of fans like myself who have played the games, read the books, and watched every season on Netflix. After searing the fact that Geralt and Cavill are one and the same person (in a way), Netflix is now gambling big on making us shift our allegiance to another. Let's hope S04 does not literally create a 'time of contempt' for this otherwise amazing franchise.

Back to the 'story so far' in season 3. Fate was apparently not done with Geralt, Yennefer, and Ciri. Their desperate need to find sanctuary only led them deeper into a game of political cat and mouse, not to forget monsters and sorceries.

Yennefer was teaching Ciri to use magic. This was a highly anticipated plot-element, one that reflected her need to control the ancient magic brewing inside her. The Wild Hunt wanted Ciri expressly for the power hiding in her Elder Blood, so learning to master her potential was a key step in her journey.

Those homely scenes were beautifully balanced. It genuinely gave us a peek into the non-combat side of Geralt, particularly in connection with Ciri (his beloved adopted daughter) and Yennefer (the sorceress with whom he's always had a complicated relationship, even after the incident with the Djinn).

Also, Geralt still hadn't completely forgiven Yennefer for the secret she withheld last season where she'd aimed to reclaim the magic she lost (through a powerful fiery spellcast wielded in battle) and went on to betray the Witcher by deceptively taking Ciri to Voleth Meir (the Deathless Mother).

They addressed these (and other) important lore points going forward and created a nice bridge between this season and what came in seasons past. I also liked the way they branched out their earlier portrayals of Elven expectations, schemes, beliefs, and prophecies, and gave the Scoia'tael a bloodier role to play. Human and sorcerous politics were both granted captivating flourishes this season, with an eye for schemes and strategies.

I genuinely loved how natural and heartfelt Anya Chalotra's performance as Yennefer was this season. Freya Allan as Ciri was also quite the revelation. Their emotive acting strummed all the right strings and made me genuinely commit to their characters.

On a related note, I appreciated the attention they gave various foods and festivals in the Northern Realms, not to forget court politics and diverse costumes (another major S03 highlight).

Moreover, all locations (new and old alike) - Nilfgaard, Redania, Shaerrawedd, and Thanedd Island (Aretuza) - were stunning. They captured such a vital slice of the beauty and wonder this franchise is also known for. The team even introduced the Dryads and the 'Rats' - pivotal characters from the books.

Some exquisite monsters also came to the fore in season 3 "The Witcher". Fans like myself recognized a few of them from the books as well as the games. We had a Jackapace, a Werewolf (one of the good ones, and in human form), an Aeschna, a Wyvern (baby, though), and a magically maligned monstrosity made of different body parts. The creature designs for each were extraordinary. And let's not forget the Wild Hunt themselves who were showcased, albeit briefly, in "Witcher" season 3.

I was surprised when they delved into Geralt's past, particularly about his mother. Kids were known to be sold to Witchers who later put them through a near-fatal Trial of the Grasses to see who survived and could, therefore, train to become a Witcher.

Henry Cavill's performance was the perfect blend of 'emotions stripped out of us in the Trial' witcher and 'remembering how things used to be' Geralt. This sequence in E03 felt so much like watching the digital game-version of Geralt.

Oh, and Netflix? Don't divide your shows into volumes or parts. Just give us all or nothing. Your own streaming platform has so much to see and enjoy that I - like plenty of other viewers - can't care to sit through recaps just to appreciate one good show.

The two-volume division for "The Witcher" season 3 made me enjoy it less than I would have if the whole season had been served up at once. I can attest to that, because I had to re-watch the first few episodes when Vol.2 released and discovered that round-2 was more satisfying.

Admirable character-arc branching and a remarkably well-detailed plotline kept me hooked to every episode of season 3 "The Witcher". The last three episodes were stunning, to say the least. All the dialogue-driven sequences and unpredictable betrayals were well-layered. Oftentimes, I felt like I was watching a Witcher feature film.

The team did good by several elements in Sapkowski's "Time of Contempt" book, and took clever liberties where needed. I was surprised at how well this season turned out. They truly put in the effort and it showed.
21 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Season Three Review
southdavid16 August 2023
I'm finding one of the trends in my reviews this year has been me saying "Some people seem to have really disliked this season, and though I have some issues, I thought it was alright" and season three of "The Witcher" is going to be yet another one of those.

Though still angry about her betrayal, Geralt (Henry Cavill) allows Yennifer (Anya Chalotra) to remain with he and Ciri (Freya Allan) and they try to keep a low profile in a world where everyone is hunting for the missing Princess. Both Geralt and Yennifer continue to train Ciri, but a fire mage is getting closer and to discover who is behind his unnatural magic, they decide to split up and search for answers.

What might have really helped with this viewing would have been to watch the previous two series again, before heading into this third run - as I do feel it assumed that I remembered more of the politics of the world than really I did. I remembered that Ciri was a Princess, but of where I did not. I couldn't remember how the elves fit into all this, or really what Yennifer had done in the last season to be on Geralt's bad side. That said, I enjoyed the actual plotting of this run, I just don't know how it fits into the wider story. The splitting of the season felt unnecessary, so much so I assume that the last few episodes just weren't ready in time. I could have done with Ciri's "Dune" adventure being a bit shorter too.

But I still enjoyed it. Visually it looks great, and I'm very invested in our central triumvirate now. Cavill is just so naturally charismatic that each grunt is enough to keep me on side. I do worry about how things are going to go once Luke Hemsworth takes over the roll, but I'm not prepared to write him off before he's even started.

I'm probably more forgiving of "The Witcher" in general than other people are, certainly my review of "Blood Origin" suggested that to be the case, and whilst I'd say that this is probably my least favourite of the three seasons so far, I'm still generally feeling positive about it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Indeed, the cost of chaos
maklynx2 August 2023
This truly felt like the cost of chaos, as only chaos can describe this season and especially the last episode. What a disappointment! I wouldn't have minded Henry leaving so much had they given him more quality screen time, better dialogue and more value.

It felt so flat. No monsters, no romance, no wickedness, nothing. Henry is a true gem that has shined throughout the series and is forever more imprinted on the fans' hearts. But, one man is not enough to keep carrying a series. It's like they abandoned him and offered no support whatsoever.

Had they given us a beautiful finale, something worth watching (besides Henry) people whould have appplauded and would have even been eager to see what Liam would have to offer. Unless that's the point. Trying to throw Henry under the bus so that Liam would seem better. Who knows!

It's about legacy and honouring the books, two things that weren't delivered.
28 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Limping on...
W011y4m529 July 2023
I feel like the issue with Netflix's "The Witcher" stems mainly from the fact that as the tone of the novels shifts whilst the narrative progresses, the writers of the TV adaptation are still unoriginally rehashing the exact same "feel" they've created in previous seasons continuously (which may have debatably worked effectively in the past, but as events take a darker turn, the efficacy of such an approach grows increasingly weaker) - without understanding that the mood of a piece must evolve to suit the tale it's telling, as it's being told... And if one refuses to grow alongside the source material, that in turn equates to a stagnation - which is precisely what we're watching by this point; a superficial realisation of the books, visualised to the screen, almost as if it's a generic, unchanging style they've adopted, copied unthinkingly - in an artificial way - in a corporately made, mass marketed product, lacking the integral thing that makes any story what it is... Purpose, life & humanity.
53 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
OMG
lenavisekruna28 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Well, the last two episodes were so awful that I wasn't sure if they were made to make fun of everything. I never thought that I will leave a comment about dialog, but the dialog is a disaster. The pace and the stories are so slow and boring that you feel like you're wasting time. No, you know you're wasting time but you're hoping that something is going to happen and that this can't be all that there is and then it's the end. Awful. I thought that the worst show ever was Ring of Powers but these 2 episodes took over. If you think about it, it's disgraceful not only to the books/game fans but to those who liked the show without any previous knowledge about The Witcher. The worst ending of a season ever. From a good show it transformed to some kind of strange show for kids... Mommy and daddy love each other while their precious princess for 30 min walks around desert saying on repeat "Hang on, you can do it". On repeat. She cries, parents cry, friends cry, they all cry and repeat the same sentences for 2 episodes. I gave it 2 stars because it's the last season for Henry... I don't understand why they didn't end it with first part.
51 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More faithful to the books but people still complain
jazzy61130 September 2023
First everyone complained that the show deviated too far from the books. This season was a much more faithful adaptation, so of course everyone complained more. Either they forgot what happened in the books (yes Geralt was sidelined for quite a while while healing from his injuries in the book too) or they didn't realise that actually the books themselves are pretty crap. They are not a masterpiece or a piece of art. The books have interminable sections of characters just wandering for ages, same as the show. The books have significant sections devoted entirely to other characters and not Geralt. The show is being faithful to this.

Yes this show has faults, but so did the books.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Decision to sideline Geralt endgame
Hughmanity2 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
After 8 episodes it's very clear that there was a decision made by showrunners from the start of the season to sideline Geralt and focus far more heavily on Yennefer, Ciri and the all-female Brotherhood. They did this under cover of saying it was a "more direct adaptation of the books" which simply can't be true because Geralt was always the star of the books.

This episode was truly the endgame of sidelining Geralt where all we got were a few quick scenes of him struggling to heal up and a mostly meaningless fight with some level 1 guards, cuckolded by the showrunners who would seem to prefer that he not even exist. Even in his final fight scene we get an interminable voiceover from Yennifer through the entire thing, who says nothing meaningful only platitudes, seemingly just there as a final shot at Henry Cavill to steal his thunder before he (understandably) leaves this sinking show.

I would say that I hope they replace LSH as the showrunner to try to salvage something in season 4, but I don't think I'll be watching anyway so what does it matter. Thanks for the first two seasons and good luck with Johnny Drama as Geralt in S4.
49 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A lot better than the reviews it's getting.
spcakebread8 August 2023
I don't ok now if just reading the reviews on here meant that my expectations were lowered. But it was a decent episode.

Yes the main events happened a few episodes ago, but the last episode doesn't have to be the climax of the show. GOT used to have key battles etc in episode 9.

The women still wear way too much make up. This really bugs me based in a forest they are dolled up to the eyeballs. Francesca all of a sudden loos likes she's entering a beauty competiin... but looking beyond that plenty happenes in this show.

How the show copes without Cavill who has carried it I don't know. But I think people have really over reacted here voting it so low..
6 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Bittersweet Goodbye to Henry Cavill's Geralt
SuperMari0s14 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The episode follows the aftermath of the Nilfgaardian attack on Aretuza, which triggered a war between the Northern Kingdoms and the Empire. Geralt and Yennefer (Anya Chalotra) must face the consequences of their choices and try to reunite with Ciri (Freya Allan), who is in grave danger. Meanwhile, new alliances and betrayals are forged among the sorcerers, kings, and elves of the Continent.

The episode is a mixed bag of emotions, action, and intrigue. On one hand, it delivers some satisfying moments of character development, such as Geralt's healing journey in Brokilon, Yennefer's reunion with him, and Ciri's discovery of her true power. On the other hand, it also leaves some loose ends and unresolved plotlines, such as Tissaia's (MyAnna Buring) tragic fate, Philippa's (Cassie Clare) coup in Redania, and Francesca's (Mecia Simson) deal with Emhyr (Bart Edwards). The episode also suffers from some pacing issues and uneven tone, as it tries to balance humor, drama, and horror.

The episode is not a perfect farewell to Cavill's portrayal of Geralt, but it still offers some memorable scenes and performances. Cavill and Chalotra have great chemistry as Geralt and Yennefer, and their emotional reunion is one of the highlights of the episode. Allan also impresses as Ciri, who shows her strength and vulnerability in equal measure. The episode also features some impressive visual effects and production design, especially in the scenes involving magic and monsters.

Overall, The Witcher Season 3 Episode 8 is a decent finale that wraps up some of the main arcs of the season, but also leaves some questions unanswered and some fans disappointed. It is a fitting end to Cavill's era as Geralt, but also a promising start for the next chapter of The Witcher saga. I would give it a 7/10 rating.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disappointed!
KaranChouksey28 July 2023
Very anticlimactic final episode of the season. Just felt going downhill with ramped up melodrama, rebuilding things towards sort of change in regime; handing the batten, prepping new character introductions for the next season. Nothing much happened to be honest in these 8 episodes. Main character is being searched etc etc. Overall didn't see anything built up to look forward to in the next season.

With Geralt character change who knows how'd play out. Too many unknowns. Seem extremely hotchpotch at the moment. As a fan I am sure I will wait for it and will watch it no matter what. But certainly not excited anymore.
36 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Better than anticipated
xebiman3 August 2023
I know Henry leaving sucks, and that there were many bad chapters during this season I slept over some of those, but this is one chapter, we could save.

Just trying to be honest.

Worth watching.

Interesting ending.

Is a pity to see The Witcher go, and we are going to miss him. This may be the end of the series, which makes one think what type of stupidity makes someone decide to take him down and assume that this may kill a tv show that was one of the few that worked at Netflix. Such a risk.

Interesting turn of events at the end, with Ciri and Yenn taking a bigger role in a supposed fourth season.
6 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Just because you're hiding from the world doesn't mean that I have to."
LegendaryFang565 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
(909-word review) Surprisingly (although it shouldn't be), this was worse than the previous episode: which, while a pivotal one, was tedious to get through, not to mention the landing and impact didn't complement the intention of giving Ciri sole focus and being an introduction to more of that, specifically in the next season.

Besides being a lousy, strongly underwhelming closing finale, my biggest gripes were Milva's character (especially Zhang Meng'er's acting; it was painful to watch - and, by the way, circling back to one of many problems of this show: the costume design for Milva was atrocious, as is Ciri's main outfit, both of which are essentially the same) and the introduction of The Rats, who were immediately dislikable, and their fight sequence reeked of forced intent to give them (annoyingly overconfident) panache.

Furthermore, the majority of the choreography (though some of it was decent) and camerawork were subpar. And the poor, artificial lighting, a key factor that keeps popping up - it appears that a Game of Thrones-level budget is insufficient; you need to pump up those numbers, Netflix - was dreadful.

Yeah, I know, that's the point, disliking The Rats and their palpable cockiness and arrogance because that's how they were in the novels from what I know, except all I got from them was the unwaveringly acute desire to witness their demise in a very negative way, not the mindset of hating them but acknowledging that they're "well-written" because of that outlook.

In a more positive light, Mecia Simson's acting in the scene with Francesca and Fringilla where a critical plot point of the past was revealed (and I completely forgot about that and how it was something we, the audience, knew, but not Francesca) was exceptional. She's among the few pillars of acting who're propping this show upward, acting-wise (which doesn't include Henry Cavill, to paint a picture).

And similarly, Anya Chalotra's acting in Yennefer's first scene with Geralt was also exceptional; hell, her performance throughout the episode seemed the most natural it's been - and shockingly, Henry Cavill himself, notoriously void of conveying romantic attraction in this show, possibly generally as an actor, seemed to try (which never seemed to be the case until now; nevermind whether it's a success) to sell the necessary chemistry between Geralt and Yennefer in that scene, so that was a pleasant surprise.

Stating the obvious, she's one of those pillars, alongside the magnificent MyAnna Buring, whose performance as Tissaia de Vries was the best of everyone. And she'll be sorely missed and treasured - the show will also suffer from her absence to whatever depths it can even go lower at this point; she was a significant lifeline. Mecia, Anya, and MyAnna have been doing so much carrying, yet everyone's been fawning over Henry Cavill. Shameful.

TL;DR: Henry Cavill's send-off is minimal, which I couldn't care less about, and this finale was lousy and underwhelming, with Mecia Simson and Anya Chalotra's acting being the only bright spot.

Side thoughts:

  • The cinematography and blue lighting in Geralt and Yennefer's first scene looked good, even elevating it beyond what I've already brought up two paragraphs back.


  • Philippa has speedy hair-styling skills: speed, in general, as her hairstyle and outfit were different in the Vizimir/Radovid scene compared to when she and Dijkstra talked.


  • "It's hard to believe so much has happened in a week," "How much you lost," "We've all lost," "Our home. Our history," "People we love," after picking up fallen furniture as if the room doesn't look fine besides the lighting. Cinema. At least do this in an obliterated area or one that shows signs that prop up such dialogue, not fallen furniture.


  • I liked how Geralt seemingly appeared from hiding behind a tree, even though it was too small to obscure him, or from the bushes, where he would've had to be crouching down - the image of that is something else - and that's stretching it. Eavesdropping seemed to be the intention; in other words, out of sight until revealing himself, so it must be believed despite the contradictory evidence.


  • Relating to that, I liked even more how, with the shots of his face as he's leaning against the tree, it's pristine; then, cutting to the very next scene/shot, with the elixir-making, he has some cuts. Sticks and stone may break my bones, but continuity errors will also... hurt me.


  • The tan makeup on Ciri makes its noticeable return at the end, looking the same as it did in the second episode: bad. It's distracting and immersion-breaking, but it must be a "What color is the dress?" situation, with every makeup artist seeing it the opposite way because that's what they went with.


  • The guys at the end said Ciri's the one Nilfgaard has been looking for, and Kayleigh heard it. There are presumably wanted posters: specifically, a physical description. He and the remaining Rats should know she's not Falka. Was keeping her identity a secret not one of the reasons for using an alias? It's possible that transpired the same way in the novels, and it will be promptly disclosed that they knew at the start of the next season.


  • Ciri's "She's playing with him" fight sequence was edgy, goofy - cringe, and not at all compelling or whatever the intended reaction was.


  • Jaskier's song during the credits was good, thankfully. Undoubtedly this season's best concerning him/Joey Batey. "The Ride of the Witcher" is tied with "A Little Sacrifice" for me.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
For Kids no Adults
doug2go28 July 2023
Very disappointing - what was an adult series morphed into a CW version of pablum action. The entire 3rd season was a mess without direction, explanation, romance , humor or sex let alone the advertised nudity - as for a send off of Henry Cavill - it was awful to say the least - I am not sure what the show runners were thinking I can only imagine they weren't - this show was at best a TV 14 rating and close to a TV - PG and more suited for my 12 year old grand son than me - this was a classic example on how to ruin a really really good series by over thinking what the audience wants - the advertised adult 3rd season series was misrepresented at best and down rite a lie at worst - the 4th season is no longer on my watch list.
40 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Let's all appreciate S3Ep6 as the end of this series
ArgonReviews2 August 2023
Will the witcher get another season with a different cast? Yes. Will I watch it? No.

S3Ep6 might not be a 'great' episode, but it was the best episode of this season and to me, the ending of the series altogether. Episodes 7 and 8 are almost wholly skippable, with the small possible exception of T's scenes here.

This isn't the worst episode of this season (that would be either 5 or 7), but it isn't any good either. After this season, I think that we can all safely agree that among television fantasy series, this was definitely one of them. My one sadness is that Joey Batey pretty much completely nailed every single one of his scenes through this entire series but sadly was just not given enough screen time. And Henry, well, he really embodied Geralt in an impressive way that still wasn't able to elevate the writing, direction, effects... well the everything else.

So long, Witcher!
18 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A review for the first three seasons
DrDumb13 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Solid, yes the first three seasons were great but the background music was massively annoying, which is why the rating was below 7. Also how they discover Vilgefortz's betrayal in S03 didn't make any sense to me. A lot of dialogues and lines were off topic so I didn't really understand what they were saying but if you sticked till the end of S03 you would understand what was happening.

I don't know why some viewers say it was going downhill but actually it was getting better. Perhaps they didn't know what the show was really about. To me, the show is not just about how Geralt slays the monsters. It's about how Geralt, Yen and Ciri change after Cintra is ruined by Nilfgaard. If you don't like the plot, go and play the games. The show focuses on Ciri, from a highborn to a refugee running for her life. The elves want her, the Nilfgasrdians want her, Aretuza wants her, and the monsters wants to eat her too. S01 is like "pilot", giving you a general idea about The Witchers, the mages, the monsters, Nilfgaard (The south) and the northern kingdoms (the north). S02 and s03 focus on the journey of Yen, Ciri and Geralt. You will see more monsters in S01 and how Geralt fights them. S02 and S03 emphasise the fight between people and people. The way how it goes, there will be more people vs people in the follow seasons.

Geralt is a Witcher being disdained by people. His life is simple, slaying monsters for coins. Despite his tough look, he can be very caring and sympathetic. His life changes after he meets a young princess Ciri from Cintra and a mage, Yen from Aretuza. They bond very closely as story progresses. Geralt has a code, that he will only slay monsters not humans, no matter the fact that "sometimes people are worse" he doesn't want to admit. He breaks his code after he is told that Ciri is in Nilfgaard and he is determined to rescue her S03 finale, realising that he has to kill people to save a life. Ciri is the princess of Cintra, a rebellious, playful, happy and a carefree young girl. She doesn't really like the life of being a princess. She loves hanging with her citizens rather than the royal family. After the diminishing of Cintra, she wants to be strong just like Geralt is to seek revenge on those people who destroyed her family. Yen was born in a regular family where she is being treated like a slave because her look makes her family feel like she's a witch. After being taken to Aretuza, she becomes very ambitious displaying a "I want them all" attitude while she is slowly becoming one of the greatest mages in the academy. Her ambition becomes more obvious after the surgery that corrects her look to make her extremely attractive. After the fall of Soddon and she's being kept as a prisoner by the Nilfgaardians, her high self ego vanishes and she displays a gentle and approachable side. She falls in love with Geralt and becomes a very close friend to Ciri later on. Cahir is a solider of Nilfgaard, he's stone cold and murderous, loyal to his kingdom. After being captured by the Northern Kingdom and rescued by Yen, he begins to question his action, realising that sometimes it doesn't have to kill someone to get what they want. But sadly he sometimes still acts like a brutal man especially when he is being given an assignment by his Lord who wants him to proves his loyalty and usefulness.

While our characters are on their journey, Aretuza begins to fight among themselves over how to deal with Ciri, the betrayal of Vilgefortz, and Dijkstra and his Kingdom Redania wants to rule the mages, the north and the south. This leads to the ultimate fall of Aretuza. Tissaia, the headmaster of the academy, blaming the fall of Aretuza and the demises of her friends are all on her because she trusts someone she shouldn't. Despite her tough look, she cares about the academy, her friends and her students. Feeling the guilt of her actions that causes severe damages, she commits suicide.

I felt like I was watching Game of Thrones while watching the Witcher. Sodden was like the night's watch, Yen was like Danny Targaryen, Ciri was like Anya Stark and Geralt was like Jon Snow. They did share some similar traits/personalities. The Witcher has more evil creatures than GoT, but the GoT's storyline is more complicated than the Witcher.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed