The Man Who Invented Christmas (2017) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
132 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Enjoyable background film on Dickens and "A Christmas Carol"
SimonJack12 November 2019
"The Man Who Invented Christmas" is a fictional biographical look at famed English author, Charles Dickens, and the circumstances of his life and time that led to the writing and publication of "A Christmas Carol." The full title by Dickens then was "A Christmas Carol in Prose: Being a Ghost-story of Christmas." Dickens first published it himself in 1843, after a falling out with his regular publishers.

From start to scratch, it took Dickens just six weeks to give the world what would become one of the great classic stories of all time. At least, that's the premise of the film, which itself is based on a 2011 novel of the same title by Les Standiford. The book's subtitle explains a little more, lest there be any confusion regarding the much older Christmas origins of St. Nicholas and of the birth of Jesus. It's about "How Charles Dickens's A Christmas Carol Rescued His Career and Revived Our Holiday Spirits."

According to some reviews, Standiford did considerable research for his book. The background on Dickens's family, his writing to that time, and his precarious financial situation then is likely in public records. Still, much of that part of the story is interesting and probably not that well known by most people, including fans of Dickens books. The very colorful segments of imagination in this movie are another matter. How much of that may have been able to be traced to notes by Dickens himself, or to other sources, is uncertain. But, this serves as a very good technique for the author, and the filmmakers, to get across to a non-writing public how a great story teller may come to the plots and characters of a book he or she will write. After all, who can't remember a time as a child when one's thoughts roamed freely into a world of make-believe?

So, what we would come to call day-dreaming, is a very likely and real way that Dickens, and some other authors like him (surely, the great story-tellers, at least) would have thought up and developed their plots and characters. And, the interplay of the hero's daydreams here, with constant interruptions from family and friends, helps one understand the frustrations and difficulties Dickens had as he hurried to get out a Christmas book in time - something his publishers deemed would not fly. Of course, everyone knows the outcome, but this story is well done, and the film is very good.

The acting is mostly superb throughout "The Man Who Invented Christmas." Dan Stevens gives believable life to the character of Dickens. He even looks very much like Dickens from a portrait of the author around that age - 31. Justin Edwards is very good in the role of Dickens's friend, John Forster. Forster was himself a writer, and it was his 1872-74 biography of Charles Dickens that is the best and most authoritative source on Dickens. Moryfdd Clark plays Dickens's wife Kate, and Jonathan Pryce plays Charles's father, John Dickens. Christopher Plummer plays the character of Scrooge in Dickens's daydreams. That and some other small parts lend some humor to the story.

There are some small deviations in the script from the real background in Dickens's life. For instance, it implies that he didn't like reporting or journalism work and calls it names. In real life, he was a reporter, general writer and editor of newspapers and magazines. One interesting thing to note is that this film was shot entirely in Ireland. The cast is mostly made up of English and Irish actors, with an occasional Italian or French actor here or there. And, while they aren't mentioned in the movie, the three "flops" alluded to, for which Dickens was now in dire straits, would be: "Nicholas Nickleby" of 1838-39, "The Old Curiosity Shop" of 1840, and "Barnaby Rudge" of 1841. Of course, all have been published since then, and none are considered flops.

"A Christmas Carol" must top any serious list of Christmas movies, and there are a number of variations with prominent actors playing the different roles over the ages. This film, about the author and origin of the classic novella, is a very good and most enjoyable story to add to one's Christmas collection. An ideal family situation at yuletide might be to show this film first and then watch the favorite (or two) renditions of "A Christmas Carol" movie.

Of all the many versions of "A Christmas Carol" being made yet well into the 21st century, I don't think any can compare to the best films of the mid-20th century. At the top of my list is the 1951 film that stars Alastair Sim. Close behind that is the 1938 film that stars Reginald Owen and Gene Lockhart. The best TV film made so far, is that of 1984 that stars George C. Scott. And, for those among younger audiences who can't stand black and white films, the 1951 classic with Alastair Sim has a colorized version.

But, whatever version or film of the Dickens classic one watches, it's sure to help take the humbug out of the Christmas season as it did in England on that Christmas of the mid-1800s.

Here are some favorite lines from this film.

Elizabeth Dickens, "No one is useless in this world..." Charles Dickens, "...who lightens the burden of another - I know." Elizabeth, "For all his faults, you won't find a kinder man." Charles, "Hmmm. How long he is growing up to be one."

Mr. John Dickens, "We must not disturb the poet when the divine frenzy is upon him."

Charles Dickens, "Oh, skittle shins to Mrs. Fisk."

Mr. John Dickens, stepping off the train in London, "Ah! Nothing like the air of the metropolis to put color in your cheeks, eh, mother?"

Mr. John Dickens, "Procrastination is the thief of time, eh Charles?"
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good biopic on the making of A Christmas Carroll
bastos28 October 2020
For me this is how you do a good biopic. Stay faithful to what happened but at the same time be creative with the way you tell the story. This is a mix of fairy tale and history, which is the exact formula needed to tell the story of the creation of A Christmas Carroll. The book is such an iconic piece of literature that helped reshape the way people in England saw Christmas, and the movie shows very well how that happened. The cast is good, headlined by the excellent Christopher Plummer playing a wonderful Scrooge. Good period recreation and well directed, this movie has little faults. For it to be a crowd-pleaser while also historically accurate is not an easy task and if I can find any flaw is that it plays a little too safe. Nevertheless, well done.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
one of the best humbugs
ferguson-622 November 2017
Greetings again from the darkness. Most would agree there is only one Christmas story that surpasses the popularity and familiarity of Charles Dickens' "A Christmas Carol", and both have had numerous film and screen adaptations. Rather than offer up yet another film version of the Dickens novella, director Bharat Nalluri (MISS PETTIGREW LIVES FOR A DAY, 2008) instead uses the Susan Coyne screenplay adapted from the non-fiction work of Les Standiford to present the lively and entertaining tale of HOW Dickens wrote his iconic book.

Dan Stevens (BEAUTY AND THE BEAST, 2017) stars as the esteemed writer Charles Dickens, and he bounds from scene to scene like a moody and spoiled Energizer Bunny. Attempts to capture the process behind creative writing usually falls into one of two buckets: dry and boring, or outlandish and over-the-top. Mr. Stevens easily fits into the latter, but as a testament to the strength of the story and supporting cast, we viewers are nonetheless quite entertained.

It should surprise no one that Christopher Plummer steals each of his scenes as Ebenezer Scrooge. What a delight to behold the talented octogenarian as he leaves us wishing for even more of the grumpy and miserly old former partner of Jacob Marley. Jonathan Pryce also excels as Charles' father John, a charming man who has never quite figured out the economics of life … and whose long ago debt sent young Charles to a work house mixing shoe black. Even as an adult, Charles had recurring nightmares of his time in child labor, and fortunately he was able to use those memories to create many long-lasting stories, each oblivious to generational change.

In 1843 London, the renowned Dickens is coming off three straight flops and experiencing financial woes that are exacerbated by his insistence on the finest materials for the large home he and wife Kate (Morfydd Clark, LOVE & FRIENDSHIP) are renovating. Dickens is in the midst of severe writer's block, and only the quiet strength of his wife and never-wavering loyalty of friend/agent John Forster (Justin Edwards) are able to keep in from sinking to even lower emotional depths. Screen veteran Miriam Margolyes plays the housekeeper, and Anna Murphy is Tara, the Irish nanny who serves as a muse for Dickens.

Having the characters of the story appear on screen and interact with the writer is a terrific way to explain how the creative mind works, although at times, the sources of ideas, characters and key lines seem a bit too convenient. We often get the feeling that perhaps too much was crammed into the run time, what with the conflicts over money, renovations, family matters, and publishing. The best parts are also the easiest with which to relate – those involving the characters and the story slowly coming together.

Simon Callow plays John Leech, the famed illustrator of the finished novella, and Miles Jupp adds a bit of twisted fun as Dickens' rival William Makepeace Thackery. There are some interesting lines that add color, such as, "People will believe anything if you are properly dressed", and "blood of iron, heart of ice". It's these pieces that allow us to view this as a journey of self-discovery for the author, and not just a famous story being assembled. The overall trouble with the film stems from that title. It seems we could have expected more than a tease of what Christmas was at the time, and more specifically how "A Christmas Carol" inspired a revolutionary new approach to the holiday. We are left to connect many dots. In fact, Dickens didn't so much invent Christmas as allow folks to re- imagine it.

Is "A Christmas Carol" the most famous Dickens story? Arguments could also be made for "Oliver Twist", "David Copperfield", "Little Dorrit", "Nicholas Nickelby", and of course, "A Tale of Two Cities". What can't be argued is the brilliance of the writer and the impact of his books. His passion is evident in his determination to self- publish at a time when such practice was a rare as it is commonplace today. The film is rated PG, but younger kids are likely to be confused with the frenetic approach; however, all ages will get a merry kick out of Mr. Plummer's Scrooge!
43 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An unexpected mix of biopic and fairytale
FilmFlowCritics21 November 2017
It actually took me a while to put this movie into a box. Is it a biography about Charles Dickens, or another version of the classic story being told? It's both.

It's actually like you watch a theater play that includes special effects you all have to imagine yourself during a play. You can clearly see the theatrical approach that the director wanted to take here. Christopher Plummer is an excellent Scrooge, the perfect fit! Even though this film throws in a good bit of comedy into the pot, it doesn't harm the story at all. If anything, it brings a little bit of freshness to the old classic of "A Christmas Carol".

I wouldn't describe it as a Christmas movie, or something that the whole family can enjoy for Christmas, but it certainly is a (long needed) new and modern approach to this story and that is still fascinating me, that this story indeed, never gets old.
53 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Fresh Perspective on the Classic Story
fletcherc2126 November 2017
By 1843 Charles Dickens (Dan Stevens) was a successful author known around the world, however he was in a funk. His last three books were flops and he was broke and well into debt. Out of ideas he is up against the wire knowing another flop could very well kill his career. When inspiration finally strikes, he is forced to publish the book himself because no publisher wants to do a Christmas book and he has to finish in just six weeks in order to release before Christmas.

When Dickens is writing, he sees his characters in the room with him and talks to them to develop the character. This is best done with his conversations with Scrooge (Christopher Plummer) a character he created as an amalgamation of London's snobby elite who helps he learn about himself as he writes. The story also dives into Dickens early life, especially his relationship with his father (Jonathan Pryce), which helps the viewer understand what drove and inspired Dickens.

This is definitely a movie that assumes familiarity with A Christmas Carol, since it constantly references the story. The title is also a misnomer of sorts, there is no real perspective as to what Christmas was like before A Christmas Carol. And while Dickens did shape a new form of Christmas, it is not the Christmas that is celebrated today. Dickens' Christmas was focused on charitable giving and coming together with loved ones, that Christmas has been lost for a while in favor of a more consumerist Christmas.
17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A frenetic whirlwind
nancyldraper22 December 2019
This movie is a mad cap reconstruction of writing process that produced THE CHRISTMAS CAROL, probably as much fiction as fact, but spun together with all the frenzy of the creative spark. This scattered approach to storytelling is illuminated by some stellar performances, but, once again, Scrooge steals the show. Christopher Plummer🇨🇦 brings a startling depth to the Scrooge we know married with the Scrooge that is the catalyst for Dickens' imagination. This was an award worthy performance. I give this film a 7 (good) out of 10. {Historical Fiction}
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Man Who Invented Christmas
jboothmillard31 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
There have been many film versions of the Charles Dickens story, but this film was focusing on how the famous 19th century author came to write A Christmas Carol, it had positive reviews from critics, and a great cast, so I was really looking forward to it. Basically set in the Victorian era, two years after the success of Oliver Twist, Charles Dickens (Dan Stevens) is having financial troubles due to his previous three books being flops, he sets out to write a new book to restore his finances. Dickens decides to write a Christmas story and self-publish it, but he has less than two months, six weeks, in order to complete it. He struggles with writer's block at first, and he is distracted by his estranged father John (Jonathan Pryce) and mother Elizabeth (Ger Ryan) coming to live with him. But Dickens finds inspiration all around London, most notably witnessing a rich man's largely unattended funeral. This inspires him to create his iconic leading character, the cold-hearted miserly Ebenezer Scrooge only cares about money, and hates Christmas, calling it a "humbug". As Dickens develops his story, he finds himself interacting with his characters in his imagination, Scrooge (Christopher Plummer) in particular. Dickens is haunted by the memories of his childhood, where his father abandoned him due to his financial irresponsibility, but he is helped by Irish immigrant Tara (Anna Murphy), one of his servants, who reads his work and gives him advice. Dickens comes up with the story that the miserable old man will be haunted and warned by his dead partner Jacob Marley (Donald Sumpter) that he must change his ways, and this will be followed by three further spirits of Christmas Past (also Murphy), Christmas Present (Justin Edwards) and Christmas Yet to Come. But Dickens cannot find a resolve Scrooge's story, Tara hears that he will let the character of Tiny Tim (Pearse Kearney) die, Tara suggest that Scrooge should save the little boy instead. In frustration, Charles rejects Tara's help and sends her away in a fit of rage, he also sends his parents away after discovering that his father has been selling his signature. In flashbacks, we discover that the animosity Charles feels for his father is from embarrassment during childhood, he worked in a blacking factory and was teased by other children. Charles returns to the long-abandoned factory to confront his own insecurities through Scrooge, he realises that his story should be one of redemption, and races home to finish his manuscript, A Christmas Carol. As Dickens leaves to submit the story to his illustrator, he encounters Tara and invites him back. His wife Kate (Morfydd Clark) says he should also reconcile with his father, who is about to leave London on a train, he also briefly meets a man with the surname Copperfield (as in David Copperfield). With his family reconnected, Charles submits the manuscript in time for publishing before Christmas, and it ends with the Dickens family celebrating the holidays. The text at the end explains that A Christmas Carol was published on 19th December 1843, becoming an overnight success, with very copy sold out by Christmas Eve, it has become one of the bestselling books of all time, forever changing how we celebrate Christmas, reminding us of the joy to be found in friendship, kindness and generosity. Also starring Simon Callow as John Leech, Donald Sumpter as Haddock, Miriam Margolyes as Mrs. Fisk, Ian McNeice as Chapman, Bill Paterson as Mr. Grimsby, John Henshaw as Butcher / Mr. Fezziwig, EastEnders' Annette Badland as Mrs. Fezziwig, Justin Edwards as John Forster, Miles Jupp as Thackeray, Jasper Hughes Cotter as Walter Dickens, James Heffernan as Charley Dickens, Aleah Lennon as Mamie Dickens, Ella Mai Delaney as Katey Dickens, Ely Solan as Young Charles, Marcus Lamb as Reverend Henry Burnett / Bob Cratchit, Katie McGuinness as Fanny Dickens / Mrs. Cratchit and Pearse Kearney as Henry Jr. Stevens is really likeable as the famous novelist in the process or creating a masterpiece, and Plummer is perfectly cast as the Scrooge of Dickens' imagination, rather than a dull biopic movie, this is a comic insight into how he came to write the famous seasonal story, it is funny at the right moments, but also poignant, it really captures the spirit of the original story it explores, and the period detail is exquisite, a fresh and heart-warming take on a classic, a most enjoyable biographical comedy drama. Very good!
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Only one complaint...
StorieLuver28 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
(These are only "spoilers" if you don't know Dickens' basic biography and/or the impact of Victorian England on what is considered a "traditional" Christmas)

This review is written in response to a critic who called this film "highly fictionalized." As someone who has taught Dickens and specifically "A Christmas Carol" for almost 10 years now, I wonder what the critic's problem was? Dickens truly did have a very rough period in his childhood when his father was sent to debtor's prison for living beyond his means and the young boy was forced to work in a boot blacking factory; this experience indelibly affected his outlook on life and his writing, and the movie absolutely captures this. In addition, Dickens was indeed strapped for cash in late 1843 and coming off the flop that was "Martin Chuzzlewit" (which he considered his masterpiece) so he did actually punch out the "Carol" in an amazing mere 6 weeks as a desperate cash grab. As far as I could tell, the movie was quite accurate, so I don't know what the critic was whining about (maybe he just doesn't know his Dickensian history).

Meanwhile, my one complaint...if you're going to call the film "The Man Who INVENTED Christmas," you need to establish how Christmas was (or in this case, really WASN'T) celebrated in England pre-1840s. Aside from the very quick mention by the publishers that "no one celebrates Christmas anymore" and a brief reference at the end about a "tannenbaum" (aka Christmas tree) and how the German Prince Albert had imported his tradition into his wife Queen Victoria's household, and now everyone will copy the royals, there isn't much mention of how Dickens' work and the period in general affected our concept of Christmas. For example, did you know that 1843 was also the first year printed Christmas cards were sold? And there's a reason little lit up ceramic houses on Christmas display are called "Dickens villages." It just seems that the movie could've included more information about the impact on the holiday. Other than that, a very worthy effort which will be worth referencing during my Dickens lessons in the future!
153 out of 162 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An interesting spin on a classic Christmas tale; charming, interesting and surprisingly enjoyable.
Pjtaylor-96-13804410 December 2017
By spinning the classic 'Christmas Carol' on its head and telling it through the lens of its author, this indeterminately accurate bio-pic transposes the core morals of Dickens' source story onto an entertainingly embellished yarn of his own life with a focus on how he came to craft the now well-known and seemingly obvious novella. While 'The Man Who Invented Christmas (2016)' does fall flat on the odd occasion that its sentimentality (or, indeed, its ham-fisted love for 'Christmas spirit') overthrows all else or when it seems to squeeze all life from its 'Dickens as Scrooge' metaphors, its a entertaining and endearing piece of work which is actually at its best when acting as a more traditional entry in its genre, showcasing the central author's passion for his craft and struggles with writer's block as he tries to write a story that's both deeply personal to him and important for the economic climate in which he finds himself. The piece can occasionally seem slightly 'TV-movie' and it's still pretty paint-by-numbers despite its unique premise and plot elements, but its flaws aren't all that noticeable thanks mainly to how charming and interesting it all is. Plus, Plummer makes a great Scrooge and Stevens is fantastic, too. 7/10.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Inspiring
rolbyh20022 January 2019
This was my favorite Christmas movie of 2018. That said, you can watch this movie any time of year because it's not really solely a Christmas movie. It's about Charles Dickens trying to write and get "A Christmas Carol" published. So most of the story actually takes place in the fall as he struggles with writers block. It's more an inspiring story about a creative person struggling to accomplish something worthwhile, and because of the elements of the story he's writing, it has Christmas elements now. Save it for Christmas 2019, or watch it now. But just watch it!!!
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
CHRISTMAS Is The Worst Time of the Year for Me
RECB314 July 2023
This may be a splendid film. With the storyline being the extraordinary journey of how one of the most classic works in literature came to life, it is a powerful and inspiring film for anyone to watch.

I myself am a writer (I mainly write short stories) and the adventure of how the literary characters came to life is astonishing. These kind of films are truly inspiring and has proven to have the power to make viewers create new ideas. Many generations of viewers can learn new things from biopics. I love biopics. Each cast member committed fully to their characters and to the storyline of the film.

I really enjoy watching biopics, and this film is one-of-a-kind. Although, with this film being all good, Christmas is a tormenting period for me. As a matter of fact, I hate Christmas. One experience can destroy something for someone, and that is exactly what happened to me. For years, it has haunted me.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Wonderful
drjgardner3 December 2017
This is a wonderful film and will be especially delightful for people familiar with "A Christmas Carol" and with Dickens in general, but you don't need any background to enjoy it. Basically the film tells the story of how Dickens came to write this classic. The writer's process imagined in this film is true to life for many of us who are writers, though it isn't the only way from pen to paper.

Great acting, good sets, and great music with an excellent script help make this a new classic. The only deficit I saw was the less than opulent sets, which is why I gave it a 9 instead of a 10.

The special gift in this film is seeing Christopher Plummer back on the big screen. Jonathan Price also stands out as Dicken's father.

Go see this film. Go see it especially at the Xmas season.
49 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Best for the person who ADORES Dickens.
planktonrules23 July 2018
Whitewashing his marriage--THE INVISIBLE WOMAN here's where he got the inspiration for this and that and that a bit of a dick

The timing of "The Man Who Invented Christmas" seems a bit unusual in that back only a few years before, the film "The Invisible Woman" came out and the latter film would seem to contradict much of the nice-guy image they created. So, in "The Invisible Woman", you learn that Charles Dickens had a wife who was perpetually pregnant with his children...only to be dumped by Charles for another woman. In "The Man Who Invented Christmas", you have a man who has some personal demons BUT who was essentially a nice-guy and who was a really swell guy by the end of the movie. Clearly, the latter film used a bit of artistic license!

The story is about the creation of Dickens' "A Christmas Carol"...and the creative process going on behind the scenes. Some of this is clever but too much of it, to me, seemed like they were tossing in all sorts of references too often. Regardless, by the end of the story, Dickens is beloved and all is good.

If it sounds like I did not love this film, that's true. While the critics seemed to really like it, I felt that the story is pretty much one that Dickens fans would love...while others would like it as well IF they didn't know that the man was extremely flawed. Overall, watchable but also it's a film that tries too hard to make something special happen.
10 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Man Who Invented Christmas Disappoints Christmas Fans
mark-durfor15 December 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"Marley was dead, to begin with, there is no doubt whatever about that." In December of 1843, struggling author Charles Dickens began his yuletide classic A Christmas Carol with this line. Known for his humor as much as his thought-provoking genius, Dickens spent the next paragraph comparing Marley's death to that of a door nail, then questioning whether that was an appropriate object and perhaps a coffin nail would have been more accurate. After three failed novels, Dickens struck gold with this timeless tale that has become as synonymous with Christmas as trees, lights, wise men, snowmen and Santa. The much-needed success of A Christmas Carol resurrected Dickens' career, not unlike the rebirth of Ebeneezer Scrooge after his night of ghostly visitors on Christmas Eve. The Man Who Invented Christmas tells the story of Dickens' inspiration for his holiday masterpiece.

After the huge success of Oliver Twist, Dickens has put out three failed novels in the last 16 months. He is broke. He and his wife have just moved into a larger house with their three children, housekeeper and nanny. The bills are piling up and his wife just informed him they have another child on the way. In two months, he must write and publish the book of his career, a Christmas story, to save his family. But Dickens has severe writer's block and matters are not made any better with his estranged parents moving in, drudging up painful memories of a less-than-pleasant childhood, the result of his father's financial irresponsibility.

Charles overhears his nanny Tara telling a traditional Irish Christmas tale to the rest of the children. It involves spirits that roam free on Christmas eve every year. That plants the first little seed of a story. After an event where Charles gave a speech, a rich attendee expressed some criticisms of his latest works. His objection was that the poor and the beggars and the pickpockets don't deserve a place in a novel, they should be in the workhouses. Charles rebuts that many would rather die. The response was that they had better get on with it and decrease the surplus population. The seed grew in his head.

That evening, he stumbles upon a graveyard where a man is burying his business partner. There are no friends, no family present and the man isn't upset by the loss. Two men with shovels are waiting nearby to toss in the dirt and Dickens overhears them comment that it's a shame the business partner had so much money and no one to share it with. As the man walks away from the grave, he spies Dickens looking on. He approaches Charles, stops, and utters just one word: "Humbug." And the seed took life. The story began to come and the characters came alive in his mind.

The Man Who Invented Christmas looked from the previews like it could potentially be a new underground Christmas classic. A Christmas Carol has been made and re-imagined several times. George C. Scott played Bob Cratchit in 1984. In 1988, Bill Murray played Xavier Cross in a twist on the classed of Scrooged. In 1992, the role was undertaken by Kermit the Frog in The Muppet Christmas Carol. 2009 marked a fantastic animation put out by Disney with Jim Carrey in the lead role. I, myself, played the narrator in a radio production of A Christmas Carol in High School in the early 1990's. I said this could be an underground classic because I thought it might take a couple years to really take hold and be shown every year on TV during the holidays. After watching it though, I don't think this will become a Christmas classic at all as this movie fell far short of my expectations.

I thought that Dan Stevens delivered a humorous, genuine, heart-felt and energetic performance as Charles Dickens and Christopher Plummer was a brilliant Scrooge. The Man Who Invented Christmas is a Christmas story that has never been told before, though it is based on the story that has been told nearly as many times as the birth of Jesus in the manger. I'm a huge fan of all things Christmas but this was a disappointment. Dickens was a master storyteller using words to paint vivid images and creating characters who come to life off his pages. Unfortunately, and ironically, those are the two things that screen writer Susan Coyne lacked. Like Stevens and Nalluri, the majority of Coyne's previous work is from television. The Man Who Invented Christmas might have been too big for her to take on. Even within the film, we see how powerful a writer Dickens was. He shares some of his pages with Tara and she smiles uncontrollably and is also brought to tears as she can't bear the thought of Bob Cratchit losing Tiny Tim and believes there must be some good within Scrooge. Later in the film, Dickens is struggling with the ending of the story and the turning point for Scrooge. His best friend and business partner Mr. Chapman asks him some probing questions. What causes Scrooge to turn around? What's holding him back? Why is he the way he is? Who cares for him? Who does he care for? All questions that make a character relatable, three dimensional, and real. It doesn't seem these questions were asked of most of the characters in the movie about the man who did it better than almost anyone else throughout history.

Dickens was a successful author who chose to move into a larger house with all the bells and whistles. You felt worse about the chandelier than you did about his wife and three children. Dickens wrestled with his own Scrooge-like characteristics, but you weren't exactly rooting for him like you were for Scrooge towards the end of the book. You didn't feel sorry for his wife who felt neglected nor for Tara who was sent away after a temper tantrum. There was so much potential for this to be a great movie, but the lack of basics made it fail.

I gave The Man Who Invented Christmas a 4 Star Prediction. I'm going to lower that to 2.5 Stars. I'd probably watch it again if it was on TV. I doubt I'd rent it, and I'm sure I won't be adding this one to my collection.
19 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a fairy tale
Kirpianuscus18 March 2018
Or, more exactly, a wise one. because it has humor and drama and bitter scenes and hopefull scenes. it is a genesis fantastic sketch of an admirable book but, in same measure, it is not a biographic film about Dickens being one. it is easy to define it as a delight. but it is a remember. about the life of a great witer. about the roots of a sort of perspective about life and people. and good kick to discover, again, the freshness of a work. the film has many virtues. it could be perceived as a charming easy film, like a comedy or a film for young public, colorfull and seductive and little superficial and unconvincing. but it is a real good film for to give to the public what it deserves. a brilliant cast and good performances. the fictional history of classic book, the difficulties of the existence of the writer. and something else. out of words. an answer, maybe. to the crisis of our time. short, it is , maybe, not the impressive film who you expect. but it is an usefull one. and that is the most significant virtue of it.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It was a good idea but it made a terrible movie.
subxerogravity27 November 2017
I wanted to love it,  I really did, but I didn't. The concept of watching what creative influence got Charles Dickens to create the timeless masterpiece that change the way people celebrated the holiday season seemed like an inspiring tale. I was energetic to see it.

It reminds me of a TV movie from the 80s or 90s called The Dreamer of Oz  in which John Ritter played the dude who wrote the Wizard of Oz and we saw how he drew the fantastic story from  his everyday life.

It's the same deal with the Man who Invented Christmas. As we learn about the life of Charles Dickens and get insight of what type of man he was. We also see where the bits and pieces of  A Christmas Carol come from, and when we starts to write the book, he lets his imagination go wild as the characters from the book come to life and somewhat haunt him like ghost until he gets the story finished. All the while the movie makes a claim of how the book itself somewhat mimics Dickens own life.

All of this sounds good in theory but it was a god awful job putting it all together. Trying to be both surrealistic and a straight narrative seem to be a hard task for the filmmakers and it made for a badly done effort.

I hate to be so harsh on a movie, but for the most part it was not the worse to sit through but it was not the most interesting of films.

I think they're versions of a  Christmas Carol better suited to watch this Holiday season way better than the version about the man who wrote it.

http://cinemagardens.com
8 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Joyful Reminder Worth a Visit Year-Round
kckidjoseph-122 June 2018
After missing this 2017 film, I agreed with my family: Considering the hot summer months and the rising political and social temperatures as well, an early visit to Christmas and the man who helped remind us what the holiday is all about was a pretty good idea (as in, why can't we think like this all year-round?).

"The Man Who Invented Christmas" revolves around Charles Dickens (played by Dan Stevens of "Downton Abbey" fame) and the personal and creative journey he took in writing his beloved novel, "A Christmas Carol."

Dickens, who wrote the book in 1843, intended it to "strike a sledge hammer blow" for the poor, an idea that sprang from a trek to Manchester, where he observed the plight of manufacturing workers, and from what he had seen at the Field Lane Ragged School.

History tells us that his characters leapt to life in his consciousness and that he became so engrossed he "wept and laughed, and wept again," and that he "walked about the black streets of London fifteen or twenty miles a night when all sober folks had gone to bed."

The film is sumptuous, the production values and photography lush and appealing and, when appropriately necessary, cautionary and convincing.

Stevens is excellent as the driven author, moving from warmth to near creative madness without overdoing either, but Christopher Plummer as the imaginary Scrooge he conjures in his mind nearly steals the show, trading barbs and supplying the logic of someone who has forgotten the meaning of love and life.

It's a special fascination to see how artists think and work, borrowing bits and pieces from the people and happenings around them to knit a separate entity that then stands alone by itself.

I didn't find the film preachy or message-driven, though it's impossible in the current climate not to think that some of what's going on here and across Europe may not have seeped into the production. Art usually reflects the fervor of its time.

Still in all, viewers across the political spectrum will find the film more than enjoyable and a welcome reminder that we should _ and can _ celebrate each other all the time, not just in advance of exchanging Christmas presents and knocking back a cold one.

Adding some spice to the film is some clever humor delivered by actors top to bottom who clearly have the training and experience to bring a funny line into the winner's circle.

It's said that "A Christmas Carol" reawakened the spirit of Christmas in both Britain and America.

I think watching this movie does the same thing for viewers too no matter the time of year, and considering what we're experiencing now, that ain't a bad thing.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A tease and twisted tale of history, holiday, and how dreams came about to create tradition!
blanbrn26 November 2017
Being a history buff and loving tradition I just had to take a look at this film "The Man Who Invented Christmas". And I must say it was an okay take at how the classic story of a Christmas carol came about. Even though the film is blended with dreams and foreshadowing, and flashbacks it still has enough drama and laughs to be entertaining.

Back in 1843 England a British novel writer Charles Dickens(Dan Stevens)has just come off writing some novels that haven't sold well and the town and his family start to have doubt about his ability to write. Yet Dickens has ideals to come to his mind from family and dreams as his seeing of an old man at the graveyard leads to his creation of a grump Ebenezer Scrooge(Christopher Plummer).

And thru this creation Dickens lets his mind wonder and with thought he comes up with the ideal to base his novel set around Christmas and a ghost like story to change the minds of all that read! Overall good little historical film that's a tease with dreams and wishes still it shows how the ideal for "A Christmas Carol" came about.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dan Stevens and Christopher Plummer head wonderful cast
gwmbkm26 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
When Dan Stevens asked that Matthew, his "Downton Abbey" character, be "killed off" so he could pursue other acting opportunities, I thought his career would go directly downhill. Matthew Crawley was a pleasant young man - but really didn't give Stevens much meat to chew so I figured his career would go the unsuccessful way of many other actors of limited talent who left successful TV parts. However, he was right to leave. He is much more talented than Matthew Crawley allowed him to be. His versatility is showcased to perfection as Charles Dickens in THE MAN WHO INVENTED Christmas.

It doesn't hurt that his Dickens is surrounded by a charming group of eccentrics, some of whom exist in his 19th century reality and others of whom exist only in his fertile imagination. I particularly liked Anna Murphy's Tara, the Irish housemaid who presents Dickens with inspiration for several key elements in his "A Christmas Carol." Ms. Murphy's career should advance as she has a quite likable screen persona and an ability to stand out in any scene.

Christopher Plummer is wonderful in every part in which he plays. What woman wouldn't want to heal the heart of his Captain Von Trappe (THE SOUND OF MUSIC)? Who wouldn't want to hear his Chang declaim Shakespeare in its original Klingon(STAR TREK VI)? And who couldn't be caught up in the soul of Hal in his Academy Award winning BEGINNERS? I saw him in his stage presentation of BARRYMORE and was mesmerized. His Scrooge is equally mesmerizing.

The script is tight, the acting is solid, the sets, costumes, and staging are perfectly 1843. This movie should become a true Christmas classic - just as "A Christmas Carol" itself is a classic. In short - I loved it!
62 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Presenting Charles Dickens from the journey of his life to his fairy tales
dreamhousebooks4 May 2018
Now this kind of a movie is really a treat for book lovers in general and Dicken's fans all around the world. Why? Because it really shows you how an idea is conceived and how a writer struggles to put it on paper while dealing with the life that runs around him/her. This movie diligently explores the period of Dicken's life when he was suffering through a financial crisis too and was adamant to keep it hidden from his family while keep his extravagant lifestyle still in order. When he pitched his publisher the idea of The Christmas carol who was reluctant to invest on him anymore due to past few failed books, writing this became imperative not only because of the passion he felt for what was coming but also as this was his only way out. When the support of the publisher is ultimately denied, he decides to publish it himself.

The Man who invented Christmas beautifully depicts this journey of writing The Christmas carol. We also get a glimpse of the tragic and lesser known phase of Dicken's childhood where he was abandoned to work in labour factories due to his father's irresponsible ways. While reminiscing some of the most painful memories and trying to decode his fictional tale, dickens start writing the Christmas carol and healing some of his long hidden demons.

The screenplay is strictly kept in the confines as to understand the psychology of the writer who gave us one the best Christmas tales ever created. Charles Dickens is played with adequate charm and perseverance by Dan Stevens. The characters of the book are also provided a real presentation on screen as real people crowding Dickens at all times. I don't really need to comment about Christopher Plummer's acting because he is flawless and he so aptly portrays the role of scrooge that we only knew so well in our minds so far. He is dark, mocking and disturbs even Dickens while dealing with him on paper. His darkness is hard to break. But dickens wins at the end as the history says it all through the book's success.

All the supporting characters of the movie provide enough spine to keep the movie going without feeling lacking of a narrative. The old world charm is kept strong with a great production backing it up. Please treat your kids to this gem while keeping their innocence alive. Even with some depicted darkness, this will only be empowering to their minds as it wraps up really well.

Visit the Blog:- quickiereviewsmovies.blogspot.com
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
It Surprised Me
Hitchcoc5 January 2019
I was all set to dislike this. The title is so pompous that it's bound to fail. The thing is that there is enough factual biographical material to float the boat. Most of the major events did take place. What makes this work is the incorporation of characters from "A Christmas Carol" who play a role in his creative process. Christoper Plummer is excellent as the incarnation of Ebenezer Scrooge. Obviously, these are in the mind of the great writer and portrayed in a corporeal form in the movie. We see Dickens as a flawed man who overspends and over reacts. It is a fun film to look at as eighteenth century England is front and center. It was also neat to see some interesting angles relating to the book.
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
how to write a novel
cdcrb27 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
this is the story of Charles dickens and how he came to write "a Christmas carol". dan stevens as dickens and Christopher plummer as scrooge are wonderful. as long as they are on screen the movie is great. as the characters in the book appear, you can't wait to see what happens next. however, there is a backstory of dickens' life. his family. a dreary bunch to say the least. and Jonathon pryce is especially annoying as dickens father. the movie is inventive and original in many ways and you should go. just ignore the family drama and enjoy the dickens characters.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fantastic
jessicadcarl9 January 2021
Possibly the best Christmas movie of the 20th century.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Descent Telling Of The Story But A Little Slow
stevendbeard25 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I saw "The Man Who Invented Christmas", starring Dan Stevens-Beauty and the Beast_2017, Night At the Museum:Secret of the Tomb; Christopher Plummer-The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo_2011, The Sound of Music; Jonathan Pryce-Game of Thrones_tv, the G.I. Joe movies and Morfydd Clark-Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, Madame Bovary. This is a biography/retelling of how Charles Dickens created his famous Christmas story, 'A Christmas Carol', back in 1843. You know the story; a miser named Scrooge, only cares about money and profits and is shown the error of his ways by three spirits, the ghosts of Christmas past, present and future. Dan plays the author that has had some success with his writing but has now hit a wall. He has writer's block. This movie tells the story of how he overcomes it. Christopher plays Dan's idea of what Scrooge should look like and Christopher- along with other characters-will appear to Dan and help with his creativity. No one else can see them, they are in his imagination. Morfydd plays Dan's wife and Jonathan plays his father. There are some flashback scenes that cover Dan's life as a young lad and how his life was effected. I guess it is intended as a Christmas movie but it's not really like a traditional one. It's more of a behind the scenes story. It's rated "PG" for thematic elements and some mild language and has a running time of 1 hour & 44 minutes. It's a descent telling of the story but a little slow in parts. It's not one that I would buy on DVD but it would be alright as a rental.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Humbug
matthewssilverhammer20 December 2017
I don't think we can avoid getting a filmed version of Dickens' immortal "A Christmas Carol" once every few years. It's a wonderful tale of redemption that fits perfectly within the larger Christmas narrative, and The Man Who Invented Christmas presents that with a unique twist. Unfortunately, the twist it gives it isn't nearly as strong as Dickens' tale itself. It's the "Saving Mr. Banks problem": wishing you were watching the subject of a film (the actual "Christmas Carol") instead of the film itself (Dickens' writing of it), which is as gentle and foggy as a London breeze, and very nearly as vapid. Acclaimed author Charles Dickens (Stevens) was coming off a 3-book slump when he had the inadvisable idea to self-publish a novel about Christmas, which (SPOILER ALERT!) became a huge success. This story is told through the compelling mechanism of Dickens imagining his characters to life and wrestling with their decisions face-to-face, giving us the unique perspective of how a writer creates. Unfortunately, there's little naturalism in any of it. His initial visions and ideas are (ridiculously) exactly as they appear in the novel, and the movie keeps desperately forcing us to make connections between Dickens' real life and his story. And Stevens doesn't help, giving a performance more akin to Chandler Bing than Alastair Sim. Sure, the production (sets, costumes) is beautiful. We're treated to gregariously be-wigged characters and smoggy old streets in this study of artistic inspiration and madness. Unfortunately, it's all stuck on top of a much-too-safe story on the plight of the rich man, that's just more proof that an artist's imagination is often more compelling than his life.
25 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed