Do Not Disturb (1999) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
74 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
... and with William Hurt as Inspector Derrick
petra_ste21 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
An inane, wannabe-Hithcockian thriller which looks and feels like an episode of some dreary Mittel-European crime series, Do Not Disturb follows the dangerous Amsterdam vacation of an American couple (William Hurt and Jennifer Tilly) whose daughter witnesses a murder.

The movie is tedious and worthless... until the climax, when my enjoyment rocketed through the roof during a supremely cheesy car chase, with a grimacing Hurt clinging to the top of an ambulance. When the ambulance's doors burst open and the girl on the stretcher was propelled towards a river, I was laughing so hard my neighbors probably worried about my sanity. It's like something out of Hot Shots or Naked Gun; more scenes of this kind and the movie would almost have been worth recommending.

4/10
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good action, weak story
boer7 November 1999
This strange movie is about a 10 year old girl who is a witnesses a murder. In the rest of the movie she's pursued by the murderer. The special effects are great especially in the end when a ambulance (with the girl in the back) gets persued by the police. On the other hand, the story is realy bad. Clues appear out of nothing and everyone is speaking English which makes the story not realistic
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Amsterdamned again!
dbdumonteil7 April 2006
When a so called lovable little girl is involved in a suspense story,what do you expect? Certainly not the unexpected! You can see in her eyes that the villains will not get the upper hand.The more helpless she seems ,the stronger she is when danger comes around.Dumb but not dumb! The supporting cast is wasted:William Hurt is cast as the father and all he has to do is wait ;Jennifer Tilly 's part is not much more exciting:all she's got to do is bemoan over her unfortunate daughter's fate.You will guess who pulls the string as soon as that villain appears on the screen.

Only the first scenes in the hotel can ,at a pinch,generate some suspense.But after that,it's downhill.The worst is that horrible "singer" ,pedophile at that!On the other hand ,Dennis Leary's junkie is quite nice.

Get "Amsterdamned" instead!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst Ever Film Category
pete-71121 July 2006
This ranks amongst the worst films I've ever seen. I bought the DVD based on the plot summary which sounded interesting and because William Hurt was one of the actors who normally features in great movies. After about 15 minutes, when we got to the gangster scene at the back of the hotel, I had to check the back of the box to see if it was a comedy rather than a "thriller with more twists and turns than the streets of Amsterdam itself". The ridiculous story line and the ham acting were making me laugh. I persevered to the end of the film in the desperate hope that there would be a great point or message but alas this film had absolutely no redeeming features for me. Truly awful. It says on the back cover "When you can't scream you can only run..." but I figured out another two options, cringe or howl with laughter.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Strangest Action Flick I've ever seen
youngian-128 November 2005
In the first 20 minutes of this flick I began to wonder if there was an Amsterdam in the U.S. Not one major or minor role in this movie had a Dutch accent. This distracted me from enjoying an otherwise interesting story set in one of Europe's oldest cities.

Distraction then led to befuddlement. The Script writer seemed fixated on Amsterdam's reputation as a purveyor of child porn and pedophilia. There was more than a couple of instants were characters made reference to their own awful proclivity.

Add to that gruesome and astonishingly gratuitous scenes of violence which were oddly incongruous (ie. the ambulance wheel rolling over a para-medic's head mashing it like an over-ripe pumpkin.)

But most of all. I could not believe Oscar-winner, William Hurt or even Jennifer Tilly and Dennis Leary could associate themselves with this strange and uneven film.
22 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful
anderson_d_almeida20 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
A mute but resourceful 10 year old girl does amazing stunt acts while trying to escape a "professional" killer. (At some points it felt like I was watching a remake of "Home Alone"). The killer runs around all over, with a very conspicuous gun in his hand, which he discharges every few minutes. Nobody seems to notice any of that. The whole of Amsterdam just seems to go about their own business. Then there's the plot. Well, suffice it to say that it's absurd. The ending is preposterous: They try to set up a trap and catch the suspect; he ends up killing 2 people and stealing an ambulance (so much for the set-up plan); then there's a car chase (another one...); in which he destroys a lot of property, and probably injure a lot of people; all that to kill a girl who could identify him...!!! He now has hundreds of people who can testify against him! What are those fine actors doing in this movie? That's the biggest mystery to me.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Yikes what an awful film
madsully25 October 2004
I guess no one is Dutch in Amsterdam. Was there a shortage of actors that can at least sound like they are a local? I've been to Amsterdam a few times and yeah the majority speak English very fluently but you know they are Dutch. Anyone have an accent? No!

My husband and I were drawn into this film because we like both Hurt and Tilly and because the premise of the film sounded palpable. I'll bet it was fun to shoot because per capita, each actor only had about 20 lines to memorize. They must have had oodles of free time.

The icing on the cake came at the end. "I hope rehab works for him." Ick. Gimmee a break.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining.
embeth2113 January 2001
This may not be the best movie in the world but it is fairly decent to watch. It keeps moving and doesn't lag, and the levity, while brief and strained, can make you laugh out loud at times. The main redeeming point of the whole movie is the stellar performance by Michael Chiklis. Why he is not in more movies is beyond me. The performances by Jennifer Tilley and William Hurt are below average as they seem to be almost falling over one another's lines. Bottom line, it's a good movie and is worth checking out.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Do Not Disturb your brain....
Rogue-3216 May 2002
...by watching this tripe! I waited nearly 3 years to see this film because I really enjoy William Hurt's performances, so you can imagine how shocked and (yes) disturbed I was when I began watching it on cable last night and saw how unbelievably BAD he is in this movie. He has a ridiculous on-again off-again Southern accent, and he cannot say one single line of dialogue that sounds convincing.

The material he's given is horrendous, it's true -- badly paced, thoroughly uneven in every way: the plot veers from pathetic stabs (no pun intended) at black comedy to morbid, monotonous melodrama and car chases, with not one truly satisfying moment in the entire film. Jennifer Tilly, surprisingly, came off very well here - she was believable and sympathetic throughout. Actually, there WAS one satisfying moment -- when this torturous exercise in trashy tedium finally wrapped up and the end titles rolled on the screen. William Hurt must have wanted to visit Amsterdam really bad.
21 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Home Alone 4: Lost in Hell uhm sorry Lost in Amsterdam
stamper27 August 2000
This is really much more of a comedy than it is of a thriller which does not mean it is bad. The action is OK, the story is OK, the actors are OK with some minor faults here and there, but who cares. The best thing here though is that it is quite funny. Never have I seen such a dumb and luckless hitman as in this one. I believe Corey Johnson who plays the hitman called Nasty has the best performance here although he doesn't act like Oscar – worthy he surely brings the most fun to the viewers. The kid, who actually is the lead character, is OK too and she brings a Home Alone feeling to this film.

The only thing that made me a bit curious is whether people in the USA really think that Amsterdam is like the worst place on earth because I mean, how could they? Are not NY, LA and so on much worse? Or is that just something we over here feel. Well I at least can say this. I've been to Amsterdam at least 3 times and I'm still living to report to you about this film, so how bad can Amsterdam really be.

Not bad, but I've seen better.

6 out of 10
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Dick Maas's failed attempt to reach American audiences
loekandriolo21 January 2023
This was the first American-language movie by director Dick Maas. And it sucks. The main idea could work, but the way it is brought to the screen doesn't. The acting overal is very bad, and it's strange to see Dutch actors and Dutch people in the movie speaking English when they are in Amsterdam. The script is very poor and doesn't make sense at all. Also the soundtrack is horrible. It's really cheap and outdated. It feels like I'm listening to the same synthesizers Maas used in his Flodder movies, which were comedies. It falls completely flat. The only positives here are some fine action scenes, with great camera and stunt work. But that doesn't save a very bad and forgettable action flick, with horrible acting and a terrible soundtrack. The endproduct is not something to enjoy.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Witty send-up of action thrillers that packs it's own thrills
AMW-516 July 2000
Very funny send-up of action movies which is also exciting and has good special effects. Every cliche you've ever encountered is utilised: the corpse that won't die; the meeting which, unbeknownst to the protagonists, gives vital information to the killer; the drug-addict with the heart of gold; the mild-mannered, pre-occupied father who becomes a super-hero to defend his daughter; the vulnerable victim who effortlessly thwarts her vicious attackers. Add killings of violent comic book intensity, thrilling chases, some nicely observed satires on American hypocrisy and European laisser faire. Throw in some well judged, tongue in cheek performances from the starry cast, some good visual gags and witty one-liners and there you have it! Thrilling, funny entertainment that doesn't insult its viewers' intelligence by demanding that they take it seriously.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I liked it.
gannawaykryer17 June 2001
What can I say? It had humor, it had action, so I can't complain. Besides, how can you go wrong when you have a character who can hear but can't speak. I've had an appreciation for that gimmick since seeing 'Mute Witness.' So what if it had a few unrealistic parts? It still had some exciting, on-edge parts in it, and you still cared about what happens to Melissa. If you people would just lighten up maybe you would feel the same way I do. I think I'll watch it again tomorrow.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The worst script ever written
morrowmmm13 May 2002
What are Tilly and Hurt doing in this movie? Did they not read the script? What a pity. A good idea set in Amsterdam with two good actors and then someone hires a "writer" who clearly thought Stallone's script in "Get Carter" was the second coming of Shakespeare. Meanwhile the crass dialogue has Hurt confused as he changes to being from Alabama from time to time. Luckily he has a lot of help from the people of Amsterdam who are all from New York. Clearly this is New Amsterdam. One good point. Anybody who failed English language in school, and everything else, knows that they have a chance in Hollywood. What a real stinker.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jeez
Zalman King of Nothing27 September 2002
I'm in the middle of watching this turd on cable right now.

Despite all the good actors, all the performances are stiff as hell. William Hurt's performance is especially strange, with this bizarre southern drawl.

The feeble attempts at "humor" only serve to undermine any chance of generating suspense. Who the hell is supposed to scared of this half-wit hitman?

And the Marilyn Manson manque, oh wait, he's dead already. Good.

I'm going to sleep. Don't give a rat's ass how it ends (like I couldn't guess).
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
what were they thinking ???
ntomlino23 February 2005
Well, first 10 minutes of the movie are convincing. However, starting with the murder, the whole movie starts sinking down the drain of stupid development, silly dialogs, unbelievable characters and of course - bad acting. Were all smoking pot when they were doing this movie or what ?

Ten year old girl kicking bad guy left and right, jumping moving elevators and tall building, being accused of smoking pot (yes, by the police), silly parents, a bad guy so nervous and shaking, only to become a Terminator and deliver some super stunt drive in the end of the movie.

Let me just say it ruined my evening tonight. If this is what European directors are able to come up with, then it is a shame. To be avoided at all cost.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Home Alone was better than this
pottich14 November 2004
I don't know what people wanted to do here, I don't now either if this was a comedy, thriller or what...

A 10 years old girl escaping from a "pro-murderer", giving him some pain, driving cars, kicking faces, jumping from the roof of a 10 floor hotel, jumping from elevators... Are we stupid or Amsterdam's police department are more stupid than us? Home Alone was so much better than this and Arnold Schwarzeneger would like to fight just like this 10 years old lady. This is the worse movie ever...

Something good about this movie??? I don't think so...

1 out of 10 (overrated)
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
do not bother
david_bixby27 August 2001
I have read through the several reviews of this movie that question what genre this film is attempting to follow...action? comedy? I think if you stop to wonder about the directors intent, you may have spent more time contemplating this movie than the cast and crew did filming it. Seriously, I don't think they did more than one take of any scene. Want to pick a genre? How about: le cinema BAD. As one reviewer so aptly noted, no one in the entire city of Amsterdam appears to speak Dutch...in fact, they all appear to be Americans and every one of them are just going through the motions. I half expected William Hurt to jump in front of a bullet just to end his own misery.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
too much like a Jan de Bont film but still fun
LouBol17 November 1999
Considering the number of car crashes, boats being blown up, shots fired etc, it was a bit too close to Jan de Bont's film Speed as an action thriller, but still I quite enjoyed this film, especially as I live in Amsterdam and had fun spotting local landmarks. The plot was quite good - mute girl lost in big city runs into trouble and can't ask for help but must fend for herself - although Jennifer Tilly's performance as the over-anxious mother was too silly for words. Dick Maas should have known better, as a Dutch director, to use Tilly as a mouthpiece for erroneous myths about the Netherlands being full of lawless drug dealers.

Some flaws - how come the mute girl was able to understand the Dutch dealer in the boat when he asks her old she is? He wouldn't have known she wasn't Dutch-speaking. Also the climatic chase sequence (some of which I saw being filmed incidentally) was very cut-and-paste in terms of logical progression through the streets. Those of us who know Amsterdam were astonished to see Hartman heading for the Central station one minute and only seconds later being completely on the other side of town in the Vondelpark. It's as if Maas was determined to cram in as many landmarks as possible!

Flaws aside, it was a good old-fashioned action romp in many ways with some deft touches of humour and it was nice spotting some of the local personalities regularly seen around town. Good fun but don't expect any big statements!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Now we know who were disturbed. The people who allowed this to be made.
mark.waltz17 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
At least distributors in the United States and England seem to have realized that just because it has an Oscar winning actor in it (William Hurt) doesn't indicate that it deserves to darken a movie theater's door. He's the father of the ten year old mute/deaf girl who witnesses a murder, unaware that the killer is after her now. Jennifer Tilly is struggling hard to be non-quirky as her mother, and fails miserably. The film has so many flaws that starts with the insinuation of the native Amsterdam residents that everybody in town speaks English, with absolutely no trace of anything that indicates an accent. Poor Denis Leary gives an embarrassing performance as the girl's rescuer, talking nonstop and being absolutely annoying and completely unfunny.

Then there's the mixture of action with very inappropriate cartoonish comedy, so out of place that I sat there close mouthed with only eye rolls and head shakes moving on my face. This asks, "What were they thinking?", and "Can movies get any worse than this?" Pronably, but it would be awfully difficult. This will manage to stay off my worst films released in the United States that year, only because it didn't get a release other than possibly late night cable TV and home video where the store buyers most likely shrugged and avoided the purchase. The viewer nowadays has the resources they didn't have in 1999, so avoiding this becomes a much easier choice. Definitely the stinker of everybody involved's career and far worse than the 1/10 rating indicates.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Weapons of Maas destruction
michiel-b2 March 2008
Those of us who are familiar with the work of (very talented) director Dick Maas, will notice that this movie is 'Amsterdamned', 'De Lift' and 'Flodder' re-re-revisited. Obviously the great man had a lack of original ideas at the time, as lots of scenes (and sounds!) appear as a deja vu. The movie is also a strange combination of amazingly over-the-top, yet realistic action scenes (although the location sequence is odd, the car chase is a masterpiece) and annoying cardboard moments, of which the scene on the roof of the hotel reminded me of the old Batman series on TV. A reasonably enjoyable film though (or should I say parody?), with only one big let-down. I mean: if you have Jennifer Tilly on board, being the actress with the best body in the business, well SHOW that body then!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Some decent action and suspense
hhfarm-129 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is something of a black comedy ie. some comedy and some serious bits; and some nasty/violent things made funny. A few clever scenes; some good suspense.

Sound like anything else? Yup, it's LBT (Low-Budget Tarantino). The dialogue isn't as clever or fresh; but neither is it as pompous and pretentious as QT's work.

And it doesn't make believe that it's anything creative and new and different. Just a dumb (unable to speak) 10-year-old girl being pursued by a hired killer.

Hurt has developed a style of mumbling and swallowing his words - bored with the movies he's offered? Jennifer Tilly is just ordinary. Leary is OK but he's not in it for long.

It's just something OK to watch late at night.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Recommended
jhs3925 July 2002
Funny and exciting thriller is an odd sort of cross between Mute Witness and Home Alone. Fans of Brian DePalma, if there are any left, should be impressed with director Dick Maas' considerable technical skill. The biggest flaw is a somewhat weak finale in which the girl must be saved by her distant father (William Hurt) in an unconvincing sequence that has him hanging from the side of a speeding ambulance. The film has very strong kid appeal (it was actually produced by Disney in Europe) but contains a couple bits of graphic violence that earn it an R rating in the USA.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
entertaining but too many cliches
Jorn-43 November 1999
Do Not Disturb would never win the award for most original movie in the world but it does have a nice pace and it keeps the tension on the right level. For the citizens of Amsterdam it is probably extra fun to see all the continuity mistakes as the cops are chasing the bad-guys through the city. Director Dick Maas does seem to be remaking his earlier movie Amsterdammed again and in a few scenes Do Not Disturb also reminded me of an even earlier movie of his, De Lift. All the Dutch actors are dubbed which sounds very strange. Overall, an entertaining movie with too many cliches.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Girl who "knew" too much, but couldn't tell it!
jotix10026 October 2004
Dick Maas, a Dutch director, needs to get a sightseeing tour of Amsterdam so he can learn where things are located in that city. What he has done in this film is a pastiche of clichés from other, better movies, and the result is not at all satisfactory, since much of what we see doesn't make any sense.

The movie suffers from a casting disorder. Whoever decided to hire these actors to do the picture must be banned from hiring performers for anything else. Not only is this an insult to the competent Dutch film actors, in general, but the people we see on the screen are just so inane that it's a marvel this thing found a release at all.

First of all, Michael Chicklis, as Rudolph Hartman, a Dutch businessman? That's a stretch of the imagination. Mr. Chiklis, an otherwise personable actor in his television series, is absolutely wrong. William Hurt is also out of character most of the time. Mr. Hurt, also an excellent actor during his New York theatre years, is not convincing at all! How about Jennifer Tilly? Whatever did this Cathryn see in Walter? Is little Melissa adopted?

Amsterdam, a fabulous city, is the loser in this movie because the director's lack of eye for detail.

Only to be seen at the viewer's own risk!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed