The Human Centipede III (Final Sequence) (2015) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
160 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Bigger doesn't mean better.
BA_Harrison24 May 2015
I've been a big supporter of writer/director Tom Six and his taboo-busting Human Centipede films since the beginning: I rated the first film 8/10, and gave the jaw-droppingly twisted sequel 9/10. The only reason I didn't give Part Two full marks was because I believed that Six still had a few tricks up his sleeve and would probably surpass himself with his third film.

As it happens, I was wrong.

As far as the controversial content is concerned, the film delivers numerous scenes that live up to Six's notorious reputation, kicking off with some sexual abuse, before proceeding to serve up such sordid treats as the torture of a prisoner with pans of boiling water, a nauseating castration scene, the insertion of a gun barrel into a man's stoma, the consumption of human testicles and dried clitorises, some wound-rape and coma-rape, and, of course, the creation of not just the biggest human centipede yet, but also a human caterpillar, the surgical process for both depicted in graphic detail.

But while the film doesn't wimp out on the deviancy, it does suffer from two major problems that make it a very unsatisfying experience overall. The first is the prison setting, which is so implausible that it renders the whole movie utterly ridiculous. The first two films, while unlikely, were at least vaguely plausible: it was possible to believe that a raving lunatic might try to stitch a few folks ass-to-mouth out of curiosity, but the notion that the head of a large correctional facility could do the same, with the co-operation of his staff, is absurd in the extreme and seriously detracts from the film's overall effectiveness as a shocker. Even when viewed as a black comedy, it's still a dumb premise.

The second issue I have is with Dieter Laser (the actor who played Dr. Heiter in the first film): his performance as sadistic warden Bill Boss is hugely irritating, the guy drawing out every single syllable at the top of his voice to the point where I would have liked to have seen HIS mouth sewn to someone's ass just to shut him up. Laurence Harvey (bug-eyed star of the second film) is also crap, but at least he's not quite as annoying. Both guys are out-acted by porn-star Bree Olson, who is also a whole lot easier on the eyes.

If the subtitle 'Final Sequence' is to be believed, this film sees an end to the Human Centipede series; it's a hugely disappointing way to wrap things up. Let's hope that Six's next film sees the director back on form: we need something to flush away any memories of this rather obnoxious mess.
91 out of 120 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Anticlimactic
dtwmstewart24 May 2015
I was genuinely expecting more of the same. A horrific and disturbing body modification style horror but I actually found myself becoming bored with the incessant and insipid screaming of Dieter Laser and the profoundly bad acting of Laurence Harvey.

The First two movies were polemical and somewhat uncomfortable to watch. They were disturbing and, in many ways, were unique.

This final installment was just annoying to watch. It did not shock and the actual, 'centipede' part didn't even happen until very late in the movie.

This movie was a massive let down and the radical departure from the stylistic form of the first two movies ruined it in my eyes.

Let us hope this really is the last sequence.
46 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Let's Hope It Is The Final Sequence
Theo Robertson25 May 2015
Bill Boss the warder of a tough maximum security prison watches the European art house black comedy films involving the human centipedes and invites the films director Tom Six to see how viable this would be in real life

I can't say I was a massive fan of the original HC . I missed out on the sequel and only watched this one because I had the opportunity of seeing it free and contains the bizarre casting of Eric Roberts and former porn star Bree Olson. On top of all that there seemed to be a meta-fictional aspect of director Tom Six playing himself and the trailer looked good . What's wrong with investing a couple of hours in blackly comical horror ?

Well to be fair the trailer is accurate in a way of "Meglomaniac abuses power and really pushes the boat out" but the execution is dreadful . Dieter Laser looks totally camp in the trailer as Bill Boss and while the performance is bearable in a two minute trailer it's not in a feature length film . I can understand that he's not supposed to be taken seriously for a moment but that's not really the point as he shouts , squeals and uses lots and lots of swear words while inflicting violence on people . It's not satire we're watching but absolute farce and Laser becomes painfully irritating , so much so that you find yourself looking forward to Eric Roberts appearing if only to see a calm and reserved performance . Yes chaps you read that right - Eric Roberts probably gives the most calm , rational and realistic acting performance in the entire movie . I suppose you could also give Tom Six a back handed compliment in making a sequel that is a billion light years removed from the original movie but nothing about it really works and in cinematic terms it feels like a juvenile delinquent who wants to shock the adult world but just ends up looking silly . Take this insult:

"Not even the corpse of a spastic would want you . Now f--k off"

That's probably the most witty line in the film and I've come out with funnier compliments throughout my entire life which hopefully says more about THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE III than it says about me
27 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
If it's sole purpose was to troll mankind it is a masterpiece...
DarthVoorhees25 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
What is there to say at this point in the game? Tom Six really exists only to disgust his audience to the best of his abilities in bad taste. Does 'The Human Centipede III' live up to this lofty goal at reaching a new level of disgust and bad taste? Not really. 'Centipede II' was far more disgusting but this one may be much harder to sit through. It's far more successful at being loud and obnoxious than it is at making me want to throw up. I think Six' core audience of torture porn fans will probably be very bored with this one. It just doesn't do anything. His detractors though who see him as a cinematic Antichrist are going to have a blast with 'Centipede III'. It's disgusting, offensive, and really a waste of film except in the fact that it will tick off a lot of people. In an odd way I have to give Six credit for this...

I've seen the other films in this horror classic trilogy and so in a way I sort of wanted to see what horrible things Six could conjure up to end this trilogy. Six is much more a freak show host than he is a filmmaker, trying to get people to shed their decency to indulge in debauchery even with the realization that a lot of his audience are going to the film to advertise their disgust with it. I thought the first film actually had some merit to it. It was really well shot and Dieter Laser is outstandingly campy as the mad doctor. 'II' was gratuitous but in all honesty that was the point. 'III' tries to up the ante with the size and scope of everything. The fact is that freak shows aren't as interesting when they are big. It's a little more interesting when it's smaller and filthier. 'III' is a victim of trying to fill up a large canvas with the stupid centipede idea that can't really hold it. For the most part the movie is Laser on steroids.

Dieter Laser constantly looks like he is on the verge of convulsing into a stroke into this film as he shouts out the horrific racist dialogue. I'm torn between saying wow and wanting to turn the thing off. This is pretty much all the film is. I thought his performance in the first film was campy and over the top but it's incredibly subtle in comparison (dried clitorises anyone?)

Is 'III' disgusting enough though? Not really. The whole centipede subplot doesn't come until the end. There's a horrific rape dream sequence with Laser that really is so over the top that it doesn't elicit anything. It's just blah. Sticking a gun in a stoma hole is gross but with the over punctuation by Laser and Six it just becomes "We get it already"...

I think I would have found some level of enjoyment of the film if I had viewed it with an audience at a midnight show scenario. This movie is utterly worthless being streamed or watched on DVD. It's a movie that's entire appeal comes from reading the bad reviews and watching your fellow audience members squirm. I would trade the ninety minutes I spent watching 'Centipede III' for ninety minutes of watching others watching 'Centipede III'.
47 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If i believed in giving films a 0, this would rightly qualify
stephendaxter27 May 2015
There are no words in the English language (that i can use here) that can accurately describe how utterly terrible, awful, and just downright dumb this 'movie' was. May i first ask who wanted this movie to be made? What? No-one? OK, THEN WHY ON EARTH DID TOM SIX DECIDE TO MAKE THIS Piece OF GARBAGE??? There is no way, any sane human being would believe that this was in any way imaginable a good idea. It has some of the worst acting i have ever seen in my entire life from every single person in this film and will someone tell Dieter Laser to STOP BLOODY SHOUTING EVERY DAMN SENTENCE LIKE WE ARE 100km AWAY, JEEZ. And on top of the god- awful acting it comes accompanied by the worst scripts in history, and a plot that made absolutely no sense whatsoever, in fact, there was no plot for 90% of this thing. This is 'The Human Centipede' right? SO WHERE WAS THE CENTIPEDE FOR THE FIRST HOUR AND 20 MINUTES??? I honestly do not know which was more difficult to sit through, the surgery (or lack thereof) or that piece of garbage that was the culmination of bad acting, writing, directing and everything else. There were a few times where the film showed signs of trying to be satirical and even self aware but it was so ridiculously dumb that by that point you just want to gouge your eyes out. I don't even know why i am still wasting my time talking about this when i just wasted an hour and 40 minutes of my life watching it. So here's the score and if you want to subject yourself to torture be my guest because i'm out. - 0.3/10
75 out of 94 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Biggest s*** I've ever watched, and I've seen many
vlm0000423 May 2015
Let me be clear, I rated this movie with a 1 because 0 is not available.

I actually liked (well, it had some good parts) the first one, and thought the second was terrible, but this final sequence was absolutely stupid, boring and lacked everything a normal and even a bad movie should have: SOMETHING INTERESTING.

Seriously, I've watched several stupid movies full of sharks, octopuses and all that s*** and I've never seen a movie so stupid as this one.

PS: Kudos to Tom Six for being capable of making both disgusting but interesting movies and also terrible and completely stupid movies. He sure has a gift. A stupid one, but still a gift.
95 out of 128 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
HUGE Disappointment
arfdawg-125 May 2015
The Plot.

Bully prison warden Bill Boss, leading a big state prison in the US of A, has a lot of problems; his prison statistically has the highest amount of prison riots, medical costs and staff turnover in the country.

But foremost he is unable to get the respect he thinks he deserves from his inmates and the state Governor.

He constantly fails in experimenting with different ideas for the ideal punishment to get the inmates in line, which drives him, together with the sizzling heat, completely insane.

Under threats of termination by the Governor, his loyal right hand man Dwight comes up with a brilliant idea.

A revolutionary idea which could change the American prison system for good and save billions of dollars.

An idea based on the notorious Human Centipede movies, that will literally and figuratively get the inmates on their knees, creating the ultimate punishment and deterrent for anyone considering a life of crime.

I LOVED the first two....especially the second which was really surreal.

Trust me...this movie is horrible. It's made for three dollars and all it really can be distilled down to is a screaming pseudo Nazi.

There is no real plot like the first two.

The production values are way inferior as well.

I was SO hoping this would be good.

It's not.

In the slightest.
44 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Jumped the shark with this sequel
If you've recently been introduced to the Human Centipede series, I suggest just checking out the first two movies and completely ignoring this 3rd installment. This one tried to be comedic, which is a major disappointment. Fans of this series loved the first two movies because they were very dark and twisted. Tom Six seems to not understand this and only wanted to make a comedic sequel just for the sake of it being "different". I've seen this happen with other horror sequels, and it never turns out well. The comedy itself was in bad taste.. as a few others have pointed out.

You know a movie is going to be bad when you have a porn star (Bree Olson) as one of the main cast.
36 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Avoid
ryanb123822 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
There's a German guy shouting gibberish all the time which gives you a headache and makes the movie really cringe-worthy and difficult to watch. Yes there's still the gore but it feels like an eternity before you actually see it. What's more it's set in a prison full of hardened criminals (who become the centipede) which makes it harder to sympathise with any victims. There's less suspense than the first movie because it focuses less on the victims. Also being in a prison means you automatically know no character will believably escape, meaning a good chunk of suspense is just thrown away. In summary I'd avoid at all cost, the original movie did the job much better. It feels like too much effort to watch.
19 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Migraine inducing boredom
bljonathan6 June 2015
The standard for torture porn isn't exactly high but it isn't so low that you can substitute being a passable well made film with torturing the viewer with boredom, which this final installment does.

The first two at least had some kind of passable narrative and were decently shot and edited. This on the other hand can't get the basics right. The acting is god awful. Its worse than just being flat because the main character, governor Hughes, yells out every damn line he has. Even after this it still somehow has the problem of NOT BEING ABLE TO HEAR/UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE SAYING. The audio is pretty poor. The dialogue at times is muffled by the soundtrack, which is pretty pathetic. How long is the film? 2hrs and 20 minutes! If you are going to make a piece of crap then at least make it 1hr and 30 max.

So what about the "plot"? Governor Hughes is shown the first two films first thing in the film. You would think that the main character, Hughes, a over the top Texan loudmouth psychopath who abuses his prisoners, would get the idea that he has been shown the film because his accountant wants to do it for real. Nope. Instead we have a long drawn out tour of the prison. There is though a decent message to the film about the state of prison abuse and the contempt of the Americans to actually care. Sadly it beats you over the head with it in the final 20 minutes of the film.

As for the gore there are two decent scenes. There is a waterboarding with boiling water and a mutilation. I would not watch the film just to see those scenes simply because it is surrounded by 2 hrs of yelling and boredom.

Human Centipede is a sad, and surprisingly tame and boring, end to the series.
29 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The taste will never leave your mouth // instagram: moviesmaniax
moviesmaniax23 May 2015
"The taste will never leave your mouth", don't eat anything while you watch this, you have been warned. This was one of my anticipated horror films of 2015 and I must say I was really disappointed. With the film's big premise and ambition, it turns out to be ultimately dull throughout with little entertainment here. The film is filled with perversely sick moments, immaturely psychotic performance, and shocking GORES that's intended to make you puke and gross you out instead of making a gleefully enjoyable one to watch. One of the main problems here is the performance of Dieter Laser which make him looks like Marlon Wayans going pull psycho which is amusing to watch for like 5 minutes and the rest is just childishly annoying and just dull, making the film laughable and looks like a parody of itself. Another problem is how the story drags out and we have to sit through the whole psychotically dull act and vulgarly racist dialogue before the final sequences happen which is nothing that surprising since most of them are already shown in the trailer. Overall, The Final Sequence is crude, vulgar, perversely sick, over-the-top in its violence and chessily insane performance, yet still ends up too dull to enjoy even for the fans of the genre.

>>C-<<
17 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A "not for everyone" funny comedy horror
elsa-629732 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I think the reason this movie has such a bad rating is that some people don't get that this is a comedy horror, if you try to watch it seriously or if you expect something like the first two movies then yeah you're probably not gonna enjoy yourself, but then again it's not how it is meant to be watched.

Comedy horrors are extremely hard to get right because it combines the most difficult genres to get right, not everybody laughs at the same things and not everybody is scared of the same things. This movie relies on shock humor and extremely exaggerated acting. I find Dieter Laser as Bill Boss hilarious and same goes for Laurence R Harvey as Dwight, they're a very funny duo and very memorable characters. But then again, if screaming profanities and saying the word "cock" every two seconds isn't your humor and ball cutting scenes aren't your type of horror then you're going to hate this movie.

I'm giving it a 10 while acknowledging that this movie isn't for everyone, but that doesn't make it a bad movie that just makes it a controversial movie. You might love it, you might hate it, there's no in between and I think Tom Six doesn't want an in between, he wants strong reactions and that's exactly what he gets with each of his movie. So bravo Tom Six.
21 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tongue-in-cheek Gore Horror
in198423 May 2015
7.5 of 10. Picking up where the other 2 films left off, but not as a literal sequel. There's an unexpected side-step as the filmmaker decides to both make a new centipede film and change the setting and plot. This is definitely more over-the-top and humorous than the straight out gore and psychological horror of the other 2.

In the end, that makes it a smarter, more enjoyable film for those looking for more than a film testing their ability to watch through the most painful, gruesome, and disgusting scenes.

Tom Six steps out from behind the pen and camera to become an active character in this film to both openly acknowledge his fame and to create a sense that this is actually happening. Like the other films, the ending definitely isn't happy. It is, however, consistent with the earlier films and bizarre enough that it should please those seeking the horror/gore originality that probably got them to watch it initially.
27 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
So, so disappointed
fthurston-2942427 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
In Tom Six's final sequence of the Human Centipede its hard to not get your hopes up. Especially when Six himself, said this:

"The first one (film) is like my little pony, the second one is like Disney compared to the third one."

So with that in mind, I was so prepared to freak out and possibly have to pause a few times walk away to desensitize and come back. And yet, no such luck. The final film was such a let down that I really feel the 2nd one should be the 3rd film as it is by far the hardest to watch.

The only 2 things that show that this is the 3rd one is the fact that we see clips from film 2 at the start and the centipede in film 3 is bigger. Otherwise we are 'treated' to this western-sheriff guy who is over-the-top dramatic and controlling and... wait for it... that's it.

Big big big let down Tom sorry to say :(
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Interesting way to make sequels, but still just bleh
jackmeat25 May 2015
My quick rating - 4,1/10. Don't listen to any nonsense about how violent/gore filled this is. It just isn't. The movie leads itself to being a sequel within a new movie premise taken a step further from how part 2 was to 1. Kudos to Tom Six for making sequels that don't follow the traditional role, but smack him at the same time for being so pretentious to think a film fan won't see right through his arrogance. Multiple scenes of what Tom considers humor point this out entirely by being long, drawn out scenes with Deiter Laser (Bill Boss) acting like a complete jackass overacting a joke to the point that would make Jim Carrey cringe. Basically the story in a nutshell (about all you need) is a deranged prison warden (Laser) decides at his last straw to use the ideas from the Human Centipede movies to punish criminals and deter further offenders to ever break the law. This revelation is made when the governor (played by, wait for it, Eric Roberts) gives Boss 2 weeks to get his prison in order. What better way then take all the prisoners and sew them ass to mouth together, right? Anyway, back to the gore, a scene or two MAY have been considered "gross" years ago, but there is nothing to raw at all. Some of the humor is quite funny in a very dark way (his idea of health food is one of them) but the overshadowing of the poor acting is a deterrent (in other words, yes, it is a b- budget movie BUT it was so painfully obvious the actors were purposely acting bad to become a b-budget movie) So again the numbnut,Tom Six, thinks he is outsmarting the audience with this backasswards attempt at laughs. These laughs tend to come more from suggestion and the cheesy attempt at being an exploitative film(women should love a secretary named "Tits") All and all, it has the pros but is to outweighed by the cons. Good news, it was only supposed to be a trilogy, so we may be spared of another one.
16 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
100% Medically, and Even More Intellectually Full of S***!
gooooogleisevil23 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Alright, there's no denying how the concept of seeing spoiled, ditsy assholes, bullies, and violent criminals get tortured by being forced to eat each other's crap can be somewhat gratifying, but watching an adult lose touch with reality and rage like an infant for 90 minutes is hardly fun. I know some fans of the Will Ferrell comedy cult would disagree on that last point, and if this is you then I can only say: Just keep on smoking your dope, drink your Jaegermeister, and don't ever leave your mother's house!

Unlike the first sequel, which had superb acting talent, this one failed completely on that point with all characters excepting those who played the convicts (victims). Not even creepy Dieter Laser could follow up the mad-scientist acting skill which he displayed in the original to this series, he just isn't suited for the Texas Prison Warden role, and it was painful to watch him fall down on that.

As for reality, and the claims which Tom Six makes to how any of these turds reflect this, "The Final (Insult)" takes itself much too seriously on it's medical and political ideas, and anybody who thinks otherwise needs to be locked up before they try anything so stupid. I'm no physician, nor have I any sort of medical training, but then I don't have to be in order to disprove the accuracy of Tom Six's medical claims. Considering that the Millenials grew up with all of the world's information available to them at the click of a few buttons, to see that generation making and accepting such ideas as true is the true horror which this movie causes.

Well, kids, it's not actually true that human life ca be sustained by eating feces. I would have thought that everyone down to 10 years old would know through osmosis and even TV that urine is indeed sterile, while poop is heavily laden with bacteria which will kill you if ingested. The bacteria exist safely and usefully within your colon, but if your colon leaks or you eat poop, you will become infected and you will die! Which is something to consider if you ever find yourself tempted to join that ass-rimming cult of sexual stimulation (make sure there isn't any fecal matter present).

You may have seen your dog eating his own poop when he's hungry, but this is normal for dogs and some other animals with short intestinal tracts. On account of the shortness, their digestion is much less efficient for them than it is for humans and other primates. Therefore, there is enough food value remaining in their feces that it makes sense for them to re-digest it when they cannot get better food, or somebody forgets to feed them. A dog can do this safely because it is descended from wolf stock, which has been evolving antibodies against bacteria and other pathogens for millions of years longer than primates have, and in much harsher climates. Humans have such efficient digestive systems that even if it weren't for the deadly bacterial hazard there is less nutrition in our poop than is worth the energy to digest it. Therefore, if you were put in a human centipede and you were the second in line behind the one who gets fed any sort of edible food, there's no chance that you would survive, and the last few people in a line of 500 would not even taste any s***, they would begin starving immediately.

Don't ask me how I know the above, just go look it up for yourself. I'm not saying believe anything you see that's posted on the subject, far from it - make sure, before you believe anything, that it's agreed upon by multiple, and qualified sources who present their facts in a level-headed manner without any hype, ad-hoc nonsense arguments or other manipulative tactics.

As for how this warden's lunatic idea won even a Texas governor's approval...I know there are some who would smile at that idea, but they could not expect that their voters, so many who have imprisoned family members, would not destroy their political careers.
16 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Please invent a way to unsee a film
Sleepin_Dragon10 October 2015
I want to make it clear, this was not a film of my choice, friends put it on and I was made to watch it. I didn't like the original, not because it was badly made, it just ain't my bag.

For the first time I intended to give a film zero out of ten, but as I can't do that it gets a one.

It's actually not particularly scary, I didn't find the subject material as sickening or gross as the first one, it's actually a really boring film, lots of shouting and screaming. Why did it need to go on for so long.

I've never been the greatest fan of Eric Roberts, I think he's poor in it, but Dieter Laser is dire, he's so bad it's almost as if someone bet him to ham it up as much as possible and take the P**S.

Best bit of the film, the final credits, on par with a driving test, agonising!!!
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Rewatch Salo because there is nothing redeeming about this iteration
danfiorante24 May 2015
What can only be described as the directors best attempt at a Pink Flamingos inspired exploitation film centered around his brainchild franchise. It's juvenile, bloated, the dialog is almost so unintelligible that one could imagine there was no script at all and the actors instead improved their way through the meandering plot that makes true B films like the Room seem like a summer blockbuster by comparison.

If you want gore, watch martyrs, Salo , a Serbian film, etc. They have accomplished this in a much more refined, intelligent and coherent manor with a plot that stands on its own.

If you want gross out camp, watch any of Waters films.

In closing, I can't really say outside of boredom and curiosity that there is a reason to watch this. Although, if their aim was to create a movie you would never recommend to anyone, well, they've hit their mark.

Edit: For those wondering, I actually liked both predecessors, with the sequel being my favorite. This one however ..
17 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The Human Centipede III : Well it was certainly memorable
Platypuschow4 November 2017
The first Human Centipede movie had a certain novelty factor about it. It was meant to shock and it succeeded, thus making it somewhat watchable.

The second was a disgusting mess with no redeeming features and would likely be in my bottom 100 movies ever made.

This, is an odd creature.

So the antagonists from both previous movies return, but they both play different characters! In the second movie the first movie was made out to be exactly that, just a movie. In this one both the first and second are supposed to have been movies.

Still with me?

Adding an element of humor this third part is undeniably memorable but not for the right reasons. It aims to shock once again and pulls out all the stops in doing so.

Credit where credit is due, the lead takes the character and makes it his own and saves the film (To an extent). The Human Centipede III is disgusting, and there is barely a story but it has moments that are very hard to get off your mind so it at least succeeds there.

Not for the faint.

The Good:

Dieter Laser certainly makes for an interesting character with Billy Boss

The Bad:

Shock for the sake of shock

No real storyline
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Very disappointing waste of time
Robborg200318 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Ill start off by saying I never feel the need to write a review for a film, unless its REALLY bad. This movie honestly takes the cake.

I felt the first in the series had some really twisted ideas, it wasn't brilliant but it was OK. And then I felt the second film was a really well made horror film, it was stylish, twisted and most importantly truly sickening. One of my favorite parts was the only part in color - the brown sh-t. I was eagerly awaiting the third film in the series. How let down was I!

I am so glad the copy I watched had English subtitles as the German lead, Dieter Lasar, (playing a Texan) was truly awful. If there were no subtitles I would have had no idea what he was saying. Most of the movie is this absolutely awful actor ranting and raving at the top of his lungs in what can only be described as the worst dialogue I've ever heard. The rest of the cast is actually pretty good (Laurence Harvey and Bree Olsen particularly, even Eric Roberts is likable). Unfortunately Lasar completely sinks the ship.

Now if you think I'm lying about his ranting and raving going on for what seems like forever, you don't actually see the "centipede" until 86 minutes into the movie, that's right, 86 minutes in! And then its only for a brief few minutes!

The "film" (?) lacks any real gore, other than an early castration scene that's fun. Other than that its pretty tame... And boring. And to top it off we have the director, Tom Six, making an unwanted appearance as himself (Tom your not that famous) with characters asking for his signature!

I really am shocked at how much of a dud this one was. I gave this film a 2 out of 10 and honestly, that's generous.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I laughed out load, once!
cyberknight18 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This film has no connection with the first or the second films, except for two things: one of the characters is kind of a fan of them and some actors from those films have roles on this instalment.

Like the previous film, the human centipede only appears in the very end. Before that, several unconnected gory scenes are presented, just to show how sadistic the protagonist is.

Unlike the first two films, this one has a comedic touch added, like the appearance of its director, Tom Six, as a character of himself. Unfortunately, it doesn't work in either direction: it's not thrilling, suspenseful or creepy, neither is it funny or entertaining.

The film drags so much that, at a certain point (around 59min of running), after the prisoners are forced to watch "The Human Centipede" films, the character of Akihiro Kitamura (Inmate 333) stands and says, "this trash occupies a world where the stars don't shine." It comes out of nowhere that I laughed aloud! I was really not expecting that. Unfortunately, the joke only works because what comes before is too boring (if you fast forward to the joke, it won't have the same impact, I'm pretty sure). Almost one hour of build-up for a single joke is just too much.

After that, the film goes back to dragging, until it ends, finally showing the human centipede (plus, a human caterpillar, made of prisoners whose limbs had been removed). All main characters, except the protagonist, die (well, the secretary is joined by accident to the centipede, so, well...)

Is it worth watching? Definitely not. Downloading for free and watching fast forwarding is not a good option, as much of the impact of the film is lost (and the only joke). This really belongs to a place without stars...
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Nothing like the two previous movies
marmak938429 May 2015
OK I gave an excellent to this film and I will justify my opinion. Having seen the two previous human centipede movies I expected something similar in this movie, just a bigger centipede, but NO! That wasn't actually the case. There was an actual plot, a story, great characters and one hell of a performance from Bill Boss! Yes there is sickness and violence but come on I mean if you're not into those things you are not going to watch a movie called the human centipede go watch something else. There was plenty of dark humor and it was very well directed. If you just step out of the attitude 'ewwww that's gross ' you'll see that it's actually a good film of its KIND! I don't know about you but I'm kinda tired of watching the same old college- students-lost-in-the-woods-killed-by-a-maniac films. Well done.
22 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
100% Politically Incorrect
izay14222 May 2015
The Human Centipede was shocking in concept alone, not to mention filmmaker Tom Six's unflinching approach to the actual acts. It arrived at the tail end of an era of torture porn horror films, including the final entry of the Saw franchise a mere six months later, but took the genre in a new direction with the inclusion of a mad-scientist angle. Dieter Laser chewed the scenery as Dr. Heiter, carrying out an experiment that Six still insists to be 100% medically accurate.

If The Human Centipede was shocking in concept and followed through with execution, the sequel somehow managed to increase both creativity and shock value. The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence) has moments of absolute brilliant excess in the actual nitty-gritty of the film's abuse and degradation under the thin pretense of medical experimentation, but the real genius comes in the actual concept of the movie's plot. Rather than keep the same villain from the first film, the sequel is about a nearly mute psychopath named Martin (Laurence R. Harvey), whose obsession with The Human Centipede film leads him to carry out his own makeshift experiment. This time around, the promise was for carnage that is 100% medically inaccurate.

Here's where things get tricky; now I have to review The Human Centipede III (Final Sequence) having already explained that the first sequel doubled down on both creativity and shocking gore. Anyone who has experienced the first two films will first and foremost want to know if the film manages to top the prior two. The answer is yes, but not in the ways that you would expect, and likely not the way most horror fans would have hoped. In terms of shocking sequences, The Human Centipede III comes nowhere close to the previous installment. On the other hand, this is the most striking in terms of political and social satire, fittingly given the tagline "100% Politically Incorrect." And the film still has its hand at excess, though this time it comes in the form of Dieter Laser's delightfully over-the-top performance.

For the rest of the review and more visit www.rizayreviews.com
20 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Weakest in the trilogy but a decent watch
samgellard-8355626 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Tom Six's Human Centipede 3, though being the weakest film in the trilogy, is by no means a disappointment. Tonally it is a mess; the film can't decide whether it wants to be a comment on the justice system in America or a B movie shlock fest or a twisted 80's sitcom. Where the first two films were stylistically consistent; the first a cliche 2000's horror movie and the second a black and white shock fest, this film never seems to find its feet. The comedy rarely lands, the lighting choicing creates a strange cheesy tone and the dialogue see saws from entertainingly bad to just bad. The performances vary in quality also. Dieter Laser as Warden Bill Boss, screams and yells his way through the film to the point where it becomes annoying; starting somewhat entertaining and eventually he just becomes a headache. Not only chewing his way through dried clitoruses, but every scene he is in. These movies arent about subtilty and nuance but the character work here is simply poor. He lacks the intensity and sinister demeanor of which he so brilliantly portrayed in the first film. Laurence R. Harvey on the other hand is a scene stealing charm as Bill's accountant Dwight Butler. Though the accent comes and goes, the characters twisted mindset is so subtly undermined by Harvey's fantastic portrayal of a man struggling to balance keeping his job whilst pleasing his sadistic boss. The less said about Bree Olson's Daisy, the better. As for the infamous human centipede itself, the concept falls horrifically flat, the idea itself is brilliant however the execution, less so. The titular "creature" does not show up until very late in the film and is rather underwhelming when it eventually rears its ugly head. The human Caterpillar on the other hand was chillingly cruel. What saves this film is its sheer vulgarity and reliance on shock factor. A brutally graphic castration, a scolding water boarding session, a kidney rape and the amount of blood shed are sadistically entertaining. Never holding back, the gore and shock comes from all angles and, although somewhat corny, always made me squirm and laugh all at the same time. In short, if you go into this film knowing it is going to be a poorly written, poorly acted, blood orgy and you are just along for the ride, you will enjoy this 100 minute mess of a movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Sitting through this was the real torture
All right guys, I literally never do this... in fact, I have NEVER done this... but I absolutely hated this movie (and I did not feel this way about the first two)

Not even 10 minutes in and it was so wildly cringe I wanted to erase it from the face of the earth, let alone just my tv screen. It was this weird mix of a wannabe Mel Brooks movie, a soft core and an awful Troma movie. Honestly, it was just all around irritating with it's incessant yelling and melodrama.

The script was bad. The acting was bad. The concept was tired and silly. I thought that the warden did good as the doctor in the first movie, but this was just... insufferable. His delivery was... well, out of this world... quite literally. It was like an alien trying to poorly imitate the human inflection. It got to the point where it was almost incomprehensible.

Everything they were attempting to do with this movie stylistically was apparent... I understood the schtick and the vibe, but it was wildly unsuccessful. To be quite honest, to date, this is the worst movie I've seen. Again, I've literally never said that. The only good part about this was inmate 297 just cause he was kinda hot lol

Also, as a side note, there's nothing cool about superfluously throwing around the n word for no apparent reason either.

The only reason I finished this movie was because I think it's unfair to write a review on a movie that you didn't complete... but dang...and the fact that I had to sit through this for almost 2 hours is an actual crime. All I can say is I hope they enjoyed the process and had fun on set. 1.5 rounding up to a 2 because... it was literally a completed film. That's it. Would not recommend.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed