Reviews

58 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Great naval battle, good character development, and amazing acting
24 August 2014
I stumbled upon this movie without having ever heard of it, and boy was I glad to watch it. It's the movie about one of the most famous Korean generals in Korean history during a crucial battle in the war with Japan. The acting in the movie was solid, even if I didn't understand the language. The naval battle scenes and how Admiral Yi used naval tactics to fight his enemy were realistic and breathtaking at the same time. I'd compare this with the 300: Rise of an Empire movie, with far less CGI, fantasy elements, better acting, and more realistic portrayal of naval battle. It's pretty amazing what they could do with ships back in those days.

The history/characters in the movie is a little hard to follow if you don't know about it beforehand or don't speak Korean/Japanese, but I still enjoyed it quite a bit and learned a little bit of Korean history in the process.
34 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gayby (2012)
9/10
One of the best comedies I've seen at Frameline
17 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I never saw the short film version of this movie but heard a lot of friends talk about it. So of course, when I saw that it was a full length feature at Frameline 36 in SF, I had to go see it. I must say, this is one of the funniest and wittiest comedies I've seen not only at Frameline, but across all films. The acting was superb, the casting perfect, and the story was just plain fun. There were so many great moments in the movie that my friends and I are still talking about. The first bedroom scene between Jen and Matt, the bitch fight between Nelson and Jen's work best- friend (forgot his character name), the whole "NellyBear" background, and the list just goes on and on.

I can't wait for this to come out again in the theaters later this fall and I'll definitely get the DVD/Blu-Ray. Do yourself a favor and go check this movie out!
16 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source Code (2011)
9/10
Impressive movie and an intelligent thriller!
15 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
It's rare to see such a fast paced, compact, and beautifully woven movie these days. While the plot device is out there (it is sci-fi, after all), the movie offers just enough explanation to satisfy the hard core techies without bogging the whole movie down. I was on the edge of my seat the entire time, wondering what will happen in the next 8-minute loop to the main character. Jake Gyllenhaal and the rest of the cast did a great job here humanizing the characters and making this a movie more about the people than the background or the mission.

This movie would have been a 10/10 if only the ending were a bit better. As it stands, it is a feel good ending, but if it ended 5 minutes earlier at that crucial scene on the train (for those of you who have seen it, you know exactly the moment I'm taking about), I think this would have been a perfect film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tron: Legacy (2010)
8/10
Stunning movie where the story does not get in the way
7 January 2011
People who go into this movie expecting Oscar worthy script or performance are deluding themselves (even though Jeff Bridges is in it). This movie was made to ENTERTAIN. The story and acting was "good enough" so it didn't get in the way of the stunning visuals, perfectly written score by Daft Punk, and the joy and excitement of "living" in a virtual world.

I saw the first movie a week before this came out, and while I appreciated what it did for its time, it was a pretty terrible movie. Tron: Legacy in my mind is in every way better than the original.

One more thing, this is one of those movies (like Avatar) where you HAVE to see it in a REAL IMAX theater. What do I mean by "real"? Not those retrofitted crappy AMC/Century "IMAX" screens, but the true big ones like the SF Metreon, or the ones in Dublin, LA Rave, etc... the full power of the movie and the IMAX resolution (for about 30% of the movie) cannot be released with a regular screen.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jesus Camp (2006)
8/10
The most frightening movie since "The Ring"
5 January 2008
This is easily the scariest and most frightening movie I've seen since "The Ring"! I could barely sit through the movie. I've known about the subject and what the "Jesus Camps" were like, but seeing it is a whole different story. It is just beyond me how these fundamentalists can brainwash 9-12 year old children with things like:

  • Bush is a messenger from God - Harry Potter is evil and would have been put to death (because he's a Warlock) in the old days - Science doesn't prove anything - Democracy is a great system, but allows too much freedom to believe other things/religions - and more...


What I really liked about the movie is, unlike Michael Moore documentaries, this movie has no narrative, no commentary, just whatever the people on camera were saying. There were no pointed questions and no questions aimed at embarrassing the main characters. It is as even handed as documentaries go (I've heard "No End In Sight" is another even handed documentary I still need to see). The only snippets where you can detect the directors' personal opinions is when the Christian radio host talks about how small groups of fundamentalists have hijacked his religion. But even those parts are logical and fair.

Without a doubt, I highly recommend people watching this movie, and forming your OWN opinion on the subject. It's one of those movies where I can see everyone, from atheists to fundamentalists appreciating (for very different reasons). Rent it, watch it, and make sure you turn the night lights on.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sicko (2007)
9/10
Strong documentary with very important information
12 August 2007
Brilliant documentary that discusses a "hidden danger" (well, for upper middle class professionals, that is) in our seemingly perfect "American Dream." This is probably one of the best Moore documentaries, and is definitely done more even handedly than "Farenheit 9/11". While Moore still uses some cheesy tricks to toy with the emotions of the audience, and some flashy stunts that are completely meaningless (the beginning of the Cuban section), the true stories of all the people who got denied life-saving medical procedures from the HMOs were heart wrenching.

I understand that the national health/medical insurance system in Canada, England, France, and Cuba aren't as "perfect" as the documentary portrays, but just from talking to people who are from those countries, they are a huge step ahead of our privatized system. Yes, implementing a national health care system haphazardly would probably hurt more than help people (i.e. poor doctor's pay, no freedom of choice, etc.), but if the plan were implemented thoughtfully (I really enjoyed hearing how the doctors' pays are determined in England based on their performance), a government controlled system would be better than what we have today.

Maybe it's because I am lucky enough to work at a big company that the HMOs treat very well (so far haven't gotten any medical treatment requests denied, knock on wood) that I haven't paid much attention to how pathetic our health system is, but this movie definitely woke me up. There could be one day where I'm in need of a huge medical procedure and I'm either between jobs, or the HMO decides to deny that procedure just that one time, and I would be royally screwed.

What can I do about this? At this point, I don't know, but knowing that the problem exists is part of the fight. I strongly encourage everyone to go see this documentary, filter out the "stunts" that Moore often likes to use, and understand that we HAVE a problem with our health care system. Be aware of future local or national politicians who pledge to fix the problem, and try to support any cause that will lead to a reformed system. If anyone has a better suggestion, please share it with all of us, as we need to stop the practice of "sacrificing" a life for better profits that the HMOs are doing right now!
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not bad, but I like the remake better
21 June 2007
This one is supposedly one of Romero's best movies, and I am very glad that it's light-years above "Day of the Dead". I must say that I liked the remake version of this movie (with Ving Rhames) a LOT better, but that's probably because of the "Post-28 Days Later Zombie Syndrome" where things move much faster and are much scarier for your present-day movie goers who are numbed by scarier and gorier movies every day. (wow that was a long run-on sentence). Anyway, the acting was still a bit hokey, and people still do VERY stupid things that get themselves killed (then again, if they didn't, the slow moving zombies wouldn't be able to kill anyone). I did like the social commentary in this movie a bit better than the remake of "Dawn of the Dead", but overall as a movie, it was just above average. Some of the scenes do not make sense at all (like the beginning "raid" and the strange ending), but it's definitely worth watching if you want to see an old school "zombie" movie with a soul.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Deeply Disappointed
21 June 2007
I've been wanting to see this movie since it came out. This was *the* movie to see as a college student (along with "Swingers" and "Pulp Fiction"), but I was deeply disappointed by it. For the first 30 minutes, I was just hoping the trademark Tarentino "dialogue" would end!!! I know Tarentino is very good at dialogue, but sometimes he overdoes it (also in "Grindhouse: Death Proof") and he definitely does so in this movie. The plot is intricate, the acting is well done, but the plot is at a full stop due to the endless drone of talk talk talk that I really don't care about. The ending was surprising and did save the movie from a lower score, but I guess I will never understand why people think this is one of Tarentino's best movies and one of the better movies of all time.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wow, the sequel is better!
6 June 2007
I kinda liked the first movie, if only for its premise and craziness, but the first movie had too many awkward moments (especially the piano scene). I must say, Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds is a DELIGHTFUL movie, and it's a sequel, no less! I was sad to see the original Marc be played by someone new (and not as good looking), but after I found out the guy was in the short film "Crush", I definitely had a better impression of him (I loved that short film!). Troy was just... I'm speechless. =) Overall, the movie was much quicker, tighter, no serious awkward moments, still over the top as always, light hearted, and funny. There were so many funny sex scenes in this movie it's worth watching it a 2nd time! I'm definitely buying this movie soon!
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hot Fuzz (2007)
9/10
It is hilarious!!!
30 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is AWESOME! I liked "Shaun of the Dead", but the humor in there wasn't "roll on the floor laughing" type humor (for me). "Hot Fuzz" takes the same lead and a similar cast, and makes an even better spoof of police movies like "Bad Boys" and "Point Break." The first 2/3 of the movie was clever, funny, and well done, but as I realized after the movie, EVERYTHING was there to set up for the last 1/3 of the movie. The last part of the movie made me laugh so hard my stomach hurt! The absurdity of the situation combined with the action sequences were a match made in heaven. I highly recommend this movie for anyone who likes a good spoof and a good laugh!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not bad
30 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I liked this movie a little bit more than the 2nd one, "Dead Man's Chest". The plot was a bit confusing at times, and they tried to cram way too much story into the movie (it's a 2 hr 40 minute movie), but in the end, it was entertaining and fun to watch. The acting from Johnny Depp is good as usual, and the action/CGI sequences are even more breathtaking than the previous 2 movies. They throw in some good laughs throughout the movie, though sometimes the situations are a bit more absurd than they should be (especially near the end). All in all, a good "adventure novel" type movie to watch. If you liked the first 2 movies, you'll like this one. Oh yeah, stay till the end of the credits for a good scene.
25 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hauntingly Beautiful
29 January 2007
WOW! This movie is so hauntingly beautiful and original that I left the theater in awe! Who knew the director of "The Mimic" and "Hellboy" (Guillermo del Toro) would have this movie in his back pocket?? Even though I was slightly disappointed that there weren't more fantasy scenes in the movie (I was thinking along the lines of Narnia), but was still awed by the expert directing that del Toro used to mixed harsh reality with terrifying fantasy. The movie keeps everyone guessing on whether the fantasy is completely in the little girl's head, or if it actually exist in reality. This puzzle keeps the audience on the edge of their seats, especially during the dangerous sequences where the girl tries to escape the fantasy world. In the end, when everything is revealed, the solution is satisfying and original.

The cinematography is superb in this movie, accentuating the mood and atmosphere of every scene and sometimes blurring the lines separating reality with fantasy. I was in awe the entire time at how vivid, complex, and frightening the girl's imagination was, and how necessary it is for her to escape the painful life she lives in.

For me, it was the ending that glued the entire movie together into a very powerful work of art. I won't spoil the movie or the surprise here, but I strongly encourage everyone to see this wonderful movie! (Oh yeah, do NOT bring your kids under 12 to see this movie, it's quite scary and violent at times)
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Step Up (2006)
4/10
Good Dancing, ignore the plot
29 January 2007
Going into the movie with the right expectations, I somewhat liked this movie. Like most reviewers who have seen this movie, I fully agree that the plot was razor thin, clichéd, and I could predict every plot twist from the very beginning of the movie. But, the dancing sequences were VERY well done, and I really enjoyed the fusion of classical and hip-hop dance (both which I enjoy watching). The music/soundtrack of the movie was also very good, which made the "drama" scenes more bearable. The leads (Jenna Dewan and Channing Tatum) were OK as actors, but their dancing throughout the movie was impressive and mesmerizing.

All in all, a movie worth watching if you like to watch good dance sequences, and this movie is MUCH MUCH MUCH better than "You Got Served" in terms of the plot and drama. Then again, that doesn't say much, does it? =P
36 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Emotionally disconnected, but a good movie nevertheless
7 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I had very high hopes going into "Children of Men", and although I wasn't completely satisfied, the movie explored a very possible and realistic dark future for mankind if there were no babies for 18 years. The movie is dark, depressing, and draws you into a world that has lost hope and where governments enact fascist regimes to keep civilization from falling apart. People either try to live on hopelessly or take government sanctioned suicide kits to end the misery. Happy stuff, huh? =) With this in mind, Alfonso Cuaron does a great job creating the world, the atmosphere, an the believability of the world. There're no sci-fi gadgets or technobabble popping up in a movie that could have easily fallen into that trap. The cause of the infertility remains hidden, and only the effects are shown. Different people react to the situation differently and is well portrayed by the various actors in the movie. Clive Owen and the girl playing "Kit" does a great job throughout the movie trying to survive and reach a utopia called the "Human Project", hoping that her pregnancy will save mankind.

While the movie didn't engage me as much as I had hoped, I appreciate and admire Cuaron's mastery of making a movie as thoughtful, realistic, and depressing as this one. Don't get me wrong, it's a very well made movie in all aspects, but for me, the lack of any explanation and too many loose ends not tied up irked me a little. Overall, a strong movie that should be watched, but it could have been much better.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Beautiful movie with absolutely no soul
31 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Well, I went into the last movie I'm watching of 2006 with very low expectations after reading some reviews, and I must say I was still kind of disappointed coming out of it. I don't know what Zhang Yimou is doing, but his movies have been on a steady decline since the great "Hero". This movie, like "House of Flying Daggers", is BEAUTIFULLY made, but lacks substance.

Let's talk about the cinematography first. The colors, details, patterns, and the views of the palace were so expertly filmed that I was in awe the first 30 minutes of the movie. Zhang continues his perfect track record in making spectacular visual epics in this movie. The acting was also very good, anchored by experienced great actors like Chou Yun-Fat and Gong Li. Even with my average score, if you are the type of movie goer that appreciates great visual feats in movies, I would recommend you check this movie out.

Now for the disappointing bits. There wasn't too much plot involved other than your standard double-crossing/spy-vs-spy story. It reached the point of absurdity when new characters were introduced an hour into the movie to add a new plot twist in the already complicated web of intrigue. The entire process felt very heavy handed and damaged the impact of the tragedies in the movie. The battle scenes were very fake (you can easily tell it was CGI) and the ending was horrendous. It just left the entire audience hanging, and did not tie up the most important plot line of the movie. It really left a bad taste in my mouth after watching the movie.

Anyway, I hope Zhang's next movie focuses more on the plot (like Hero) and less on the spectacles. Otherwise, his good name as a director will probably go down the drain.
21 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Apocalypto (2006)
8/10
Wonderful world created by Mel Gibson
31 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Mel Gibson is one of the great directors at creating a movie that pays attention to every single detail of the period and people his movie is trying to portray. In the great tradition of Braveheart and Passion of the Christ, Gibson outdoes himself with Apocalypto and creates a completely believable world during the Mayan times. Watching this movie, I felt like watching a documentary on the people who lived during those times. Whether it is true to the facts doesn't matter anymore.

The actor playing Jaguar was brilliant in acting without words (half of the movie doesn't involve dialog), and overall the movie was like an adventure for the movie-goers to experience. There really isn't much plot involved with the movie, but the chase scenes are wonderfully intense and well filmed. Even with it's bloody nature (which I think is necessary for the story), I still recommend this movie for people to watch.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Babel (I) (2006)
7/10
Smart movies with great plot, but hurts itself by the "weaving" device
31 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
In the tradition of great movies like Syriana and The Hours, Babel weaves 4 seemingly unrelated stories in four different languages together into a pretty good tapestry. While each of the stories explore a type of communication (or lack thereof) between different relationships (father and daughter, husband and wife, etc.) very well, when put together, I felt the movie was missing the "magic" that made Syriana and The Hours great movies. Maybe it was because one of the stories was so tenuously linked to the other three, or maybe it was because of the jarring transitions between the stories before a scene comes to a conclusion? I cannot answer these questions definitively, and will have to let the movie goers decide for themselves.

Acting wise, all the actors in the movie were very good (Brad Pitt taking a George Clooney-esquire turn a la Syriana). The most heartbreaking story focused on a deaf-mute Japanese girl's struggles, and the actress there was superb. I will not spoil the movie for everyone, but that story alone is worth the ticket.

While I personally don't believe this to be one of the best movies of the year, I do think people should see it for the cultural issues it discusses. It takes a look at the immigration issues of the US, as well as the "terrorist" stigma many Islamic countries are branded by the US. Check it out, it's a very intelligent movie that everyone should catch.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Brilliant performance by Will Smith!
26 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
A very standard "rags to riches" story that is lifted to another level by the absolutely masterful performance by Will Smith. Of course, being filmed in the SF Bay Area definitely brings the story "home" that much more.

"Pursuit of Happiness" is about a very poor family with a 5 year old kid trying to survive in a big city. Will Smith plays Chris Gardner, a smart man who for some reason or another (wasn't explained in the movie), never achieved all the dreams he went out to achieve. Instead, he's stuck selling medical devices that nobody wants and barely surviving with his wife (played by a very good Thandie Newton) and son (Jaden Smith, Will's real life son). Without going into a summary of the movie, the "Pursuit of Happiness" explores what has happened to the idea of the "American Dream" and the famous guarantee that all Americans have the right to "life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness".

The plot is predictable, some parts were "cheesed" up for dramatic effect. The social commentary about the rich-poor divide and homelessness issues are also valuable. But overall, you really appreciate the father-son interactions (definitely helped by being real life father and son) and all the sacrifices that a parent has to make to provide for a better living condition for their kids. It is also a story about one of the few who "made it" in our modern world pursuing a better life. If not for Will Smith, this movie would just fade into the drowning roar of "inspiring movies", especially during this Oscar season. But I now firmly believe Will Smith to be one of the premier young(ish) actors out there and am truly impressed by the acting range he had in this movie.

Definitely recommended in this holiday season!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Eragon (2006)
2/10
It's better than Dungeons and Dragons, and that's not saying much
18 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
"I suffer without my stone. Do not prolong my suffering." - John Malkovich as King Galvatron-Matrix... eh, I meant Galbatorix.

Wow... how did they make a movie THIS bad??? Before I go into the bad things, let's talk about what's good:

  • Jeremy Irons did his best to work with absolutely NOTHING... I applaud his effort.


  • The CG and scenery were good, but nothing to write home about compared to Lord of the Rings


Um... that's it...

The bad:

  • The acting was very wooden and unnatural... not horrible, but not good either.


  • The story was a merging of Star Wars with Lord of the Rings, with a bit of Dungeons and Dragons thrown in. I don't know what the book is like, but the author/writer clearly was influenced by the two stories and merged them together... An example you ask?


Eragon = Luke Princess Arya = Princes Leia King Galbatorix/Durza = Emperor/Darth Vader Magic = Force Varden Stronghold = Helm's Deep

There was even a sunset scene with Eragon sitting on cliff looking out into the horizon! I was only surprised that there weren't two suns in the sky!

  • The dialogue... OH MY, the dialogue was horrible! As you can see in the FIRST line of the movie, it did not get to a good start. Every line delivered was painful to hear, and sometimes you just cannot believe that the characters are uttering such gibberish. I took a quick look at the book at Borders after the movie, and it was definitely better written than the dialogue in the movie.


All in all, it was a movie where I laughed out loud with my friends multiple times (and not for good reason) and kept on throwing out LOTR and Star Wars references throughout the movie. I went in with very low expectations, but I didn't expect an "epic" (only 90 minutes long) movie like this would be THAT bad... The only thing I can say about it is, it's better than Dungeons and Dragons... and that's not saying much!

Watch this movie at your own risk and peril!
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blood Diamond (2006)
8/10
Bloody and tragic portrayal of life in Africa
13 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Blood Diamond takes a look at the diamond business in Sierra Leone in 1999. Most of the diamonds minded in that country at the time were called "blood diamonds" because of all the death and destruction they caused. The money from the diamonds were used to buy weapons to start civil wars, massacres, and enslave more people to mine more diamonds. The film might be fictional, but I'm pretty sure exploitation of Africa is still happening everywhere on that continent, whether it's for diamonds, oil, ivory, or any other precious resources.

Thus, before I go into the review, please make sure that any diamonds you buy is NOT a "conflict diamond" so you don't support more bloodshed and tragedy in Africa. (I'll get off the soap box now) The movie was good, if only because of the amazing acting talents of Leonardo DiCaprio and Djimon Honsou, and the unflinching and often explicitly violent depiction of war torn Africa/Sierra Leone. Watching one village after another getting slaughtered for no reason other than "revolution" or diamonds was painful (but necessary) to watch. Along with "Lord of War" and "The Constant Gardner", "Blood Diamond" is a film that everyone should see to understand the plight of those who are much more unfortunate than us.

I believe with "The Departed" and this movie, Leo should be getting an Oscar nomination soon, and Djimon Honsou was a very capable supporting actor. The storyline was a bit long and dragged out at moments, and some scenes were too sappy, but overall, I give this movie a high score because of the issues it explored and the strong performances (as well as the great cinematography).

Go check it out. It'll make you appreciate what you have in life and think again when you look for your next diamond purchase.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Brilliantly original movie!
3 December 2006
Wow! Now this is one of the most original movies that I have seen in a long time! Normally I really do not like watching Will Farrell in any movie (except for Mugatu in Zoolander), but he really impressed me in "Stranger Than Fiction"! The acting was first rate in this movie, with supporting characters like Robert DeNiro, Emma Thompson, Maggie Gyllenhaal, and Queen Latifah. Will Farrell surprisingly held his own against these heavyweights and together, they carried out the very clever and suspenseful script to perfection. This film really threw me off as it is a very witty comedy, as well as a powerful drama and a potential tragedy (I won't spoil the ending). At points I wasn't sure whether to cry or laugh at the scene, and that is something that very few movies have been able to do to people. The script was very poetically written, considering it is mainly about a famous author's description of an every day guy.

Thus, with all these great aspects of the film coming together (acting, script, directing, humor), it made for an exceedingly impressive movie in which I may consider giving a 10 upon a 2nd viewing in the future. I highly recommend this movie to anyone who wants to see a truly fun, original, and well executed film!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shortbus (2006)
8/10
Thought-provoking, candid, and brutally honest
3 December 2006
A good movie that explores all ranges of human sexuality and makes you think. It's explicit yet isn't pornographic. The movie is not intended for the faint of heart to watch. But with an open mind, you'll learn something from watching this movie.

The acting is the only weakness in this movie (and a few strange psychedelic scenes in the end), which explains the score I give the film. But, I applaud James Cameron Mitchell for directing a movie that so candidly and honestly explore all the relationship issues that all human beings have, and not just limit it to a category of people. While many may dismiss this movie as a poor excuse to shock people with sex, people who delve deeper will find that the director has a deep understanding of what a majority of people on this planet go through in their every day love life.

Check it out, withhold your judgment, and stay open to ideas. I think it will teach you something.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Casino Royale (2006)
8/10
Great Bond movie at last!
3 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The best Bond movie I've seen (granted, I've only seen the more recent ones with Pierce Brosnan) so far. Amidst the doubt and attacks, Daniel Craig showed everyone that a blonde Bond can actually be fun, sexy, and exciting to watch. After 20+ films over the past few decades, this film reveals how James Bond became an agent and his early days. Some of the best lines include: Bartender: "Shaken or Stirred", Bond: "Who cares?" (or something like that).

The acting was good, plot suspenseful, and action was of course very exciting. Having poker as one of the main plot line doesn't hurt either (one of my current favorite hobbies)! So whether you're a 007 franchise fan or not, check out the movie, you will find it very enjoyable!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Shocking...
4 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
On my Netflix quest to watch more documentaries, I finally got the chance to watch this pretty shocking documentary. The film explores many of the ruthless ways that Wal-Mart employs to keep costs of merchandise low and profits up. Some of the things they do border what Mr. Bush would call, "evil." I will list a few important points here, but you should watch the documentary itself to get the details:

  • Large % of their employees and children of employees are on Medicaid instead of Wal-Mart's health plan - Women and people of color are strongly discriminated against - The store is very anti-union, yet they pay their employees didly squat and work them overtime with no pay - The working conditions in China and Bangladesh are horrific, in order to get the cheap merchandise Wal-Mart has to sell to the US - The crime rate in Wal-Mart parking lots is shockingly high (and somewhat scary to think I braved one of them in Houston which had some murders and rapes occur!) and Wal-Mart does nothing about them.


The list goes on, but those are just some of the more important ones. In my personal view, Wal-Mart makes Microsoft look like Toys R Us. Good thing there's always Target and Costco to shop at. =) Many cities in the country (including Chicago and Queens, NY) have rejected Wal-Mart from their neighborhoods...

Check the documentary out and make your own judgments on whether you should shop at Wal-Mart in the future.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fearless (2006)
6/10
Not as good as it should be...
4 October 2006
Maybe I was looking forward to the movie too much, or this movie was hyped as "Jet Li's final martial arts epic", but other than the fight scenes, I found most of the movie to be somewhat slow, and at times difficult, to watch. The fight scenes were very well choreographed as usual, and Jet Li is impressive in all the martial arts forms that he does. But in terms of acting, something just didn't feel right, especially with Huo Yuan Jia's "early" years. It just looked fake and forced to me.

The story itself was pretty interesting, as it was supposed to be based on a true story (and the martial arts club that Huo Yuan Jia started is still thriving today), but it definitely did not have the depth and impact of "Hero" or even "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon". Too bad. Maybe Jet Li's next movie with Jackie Chan will be much better!
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed