Stonehenge Apocalypse (TV Movie 2010) Poster

(2010 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
58 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Above average SYFY movie
cassmj13 June 2010
I was expecting the same 'ol SYFY, but instead found this to be above average for that network. The acting was fine -- sometimes actually good -- and the story was acceptable. They actually paid attention to small details as well, which added to the attraction. I was actually interested in most of the characters and wanted them to live; compare this to Princess of Mars where I wondered if there actually was a story, and didn't care if the characters disappeared.

Some reviews here bashed the story, but I can only ask: did you forget this is SYFY? It's science "fiction" -- science "fact" appears on the Science Channel, History, National Geographic, etc. This is a fine SYFY story, enjoyable, and fun.

Give it a shot.
63 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
To many logical breaches.
nibland1 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The story in it self could have potential, but did not quite do it for me.First of all, where was the body discovered? I did not see that any archeologists found any human remains. And how did the surveillancecamera mounted on top of the Stonehenge survive the EMP's, when it manage to drain the power of two cars later in the film? To many sloppy mistakes in the script concerning these minor details.

I also think that there were too many clichés about the American military and that the commanders must be irrational and close to stupid to lead the most powerful militaryforce in the world. I agree with some others in here that the acting sometimes were good, but also very bad by some actors as well. I give the movie a plus for trying as hard as possible to sty serious throughout the movie.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
How the world might end on a low budget
MartianOctocretr513 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The generic style title makes it sound going in like a just another end-of-everything flick, and OK to approach just as a mindless way to kill some time on a stay-in evening. It's got a limited budget as you'd expect, but the script manages to offer a few new ideas.

Stonehenge, due to its mysterious origin, creator, and purpose, is ripe for one of these "way out" doomsday prophecy themed stories. Without giving away too much, weird stuff starts happening at the famous site. Other similar ancient shrines all over the world also seem to be effecting odd behavior. (Warning: essential cliché hero alert:) The hero is a brilliant rogue scientist who's into conspiracy theories, lol. Throw in a general who wants to nuke stuff, a cult with a demented prophet, some high powered alien contraptions, and an "ancient artifact" that looks like it was taken from a 1962 Ford Falcon.

Oddly enough, the thread of the story is all tied together pretty nicely. The story is told well, although the resolution of things takes some doing to swallow. Cheap, but a fair way to spend some time.
21 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't bother
charris-80-87016614 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
If one wishes to make a motion picture in the Science Fiction genre, one should start with a reasonably valid premise and develop the plot around that premise. It makes the storyline more or less believable. Furthermore, the plot should be developed in a believable manner.

The concept of detonating a nuclear device at the Stonehenge location by some American General, without a word of interference from the British people is a bit of an imaginative stretch to say the least. Furthermore, it conveys a condescending attitude and the impression that if the world is to be saved, it will be done by an American. Overall, the plot was trite and boringly predictable.

Comparing this poorly thought out piece with '2012' (As seen on the DVD box cover) is ridiculous and serves only to engender further distrust of movie reviews. Having said that, I didn't think much of the concept behind '2012' either but at least the plot was interesting.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My thoughts
MaxusSpookirie12 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Well, I watched this movie and its companion movie, Annihilation Earth tonight. Stonehenge Apocalypse was more believable and enjoyable than its companion movie for SyFy Saturday Night. Naturally, the plot was really silly. Volcanoes out of the World Heritage site pyramids, really? I had to laugh at that. Stonehenge as a doomsday clock countdown counter and destruction mechanism. That is something different, and I had to give bonus points for that idea. The dialogue and acting in the movie was bearable compared to Annihilation Earth's. The special effects is the SyFy usual. There wasn't much of a focus on the doomsday cult. I had to laugh.. The movie painted the British head officer of sciences was a complete moron. He didn't know half the stuff he was discussing..

If it wasn't for Annihilation Earth, I would have given this movie a far worse review, but i think that piece of crap saved this movie a star and half from the worst star rating on my scale.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
So bad, it's actually good fun.
BarryDiz3 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
As B movies go, although unintended is a comedy gem, filled with stereotypes and inaccuracy. Collins, Wingfield and Higginson do their best to carry it along, The sheer lack of research into the location lets the movie down, placing one of the most recognisable monuments in the world in a hilly forested area, the complete opposite of where you'll actually find it, in all movies you expect a bit of artistic licence but this example is hilarious, along with the obviously Canadian road markings and signage. Major (wearing the rank of Captain for some reason) Peatman's accent is a comedy highlight, sounding like a Dick Van Dyke cockney crossed with Scotsman and Crocodile Dundee, even the stereotypical US General who predictably wants to nuke the whole of Salisbury is quite funny and ends up ordering directive 10/15 which is actually something to do with affordable housing in the US. I know defence cuts in the UK are pretty harsh but I'm sure the army could rustle up more than one tank, one truck and three other vehicles, most being either ancient or non-British, best summed up in the final chase scene which sees an ancient American jeep being chased across Salisbury plain by a French Peugeot open top thing. I can only guess that the majority of the budget went on administration as there was very little left for the movie. However I do have a soft spot for this movie, so much so that I have the DVD, watch it if you need a giggle.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Pile of Poo
Purrdee12 July 2010
I was moved so much by this film to register at IMDb just so i could warn anybody who has not yet watched this film to save them from what must be described as cringe worthy agony.

The acting was dire, the sets i think where built by the pupils of the primary school that they had taken over. The pyramid in Maine was superb.

I was amazed to see the terraform had already started with the mountain ranges surrounding Stonehenge on Salisbury PLAIN !! noun: a large area of flat land with few trees. Compare with prairie.

It was only redeemed by the fact that it was so bad i wanted to watch more of it to see what else they could get wrong.

If you like that sort of pain then this ones for you..
61 out of 95 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful. Avoid like the plague.
tethran_cotec31 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This review contains minor spoilers about an awful film. Given just how bad the film is these spoilers shouldn't be a problem to read as they serve to illustrate just why the film needs to be avoided.

This is the sort of film that is only good to watch if you're sitting with a group of friends with something to drink who all enjoy pointing at the screen and shouting at the hordes of incredibly obvious mistakes.

If you were to switch on this movie part way through you could be forgiven for assuming for the first few minutes that it was supposed to be a spoof of disaster movies. Unfortunately this is not the case and instead it is supposed to be a serious science fiction film.

However, this film seems to contain little to no science and there are many parts that would fall into the trope of "You Fail Physics Forever" such as a mind breaking scene where a radio-telescope is re-purposed in a few hours on the countdown to create a jamming signal by producing electromagnetic waves targeted at Stonehenge that as the wavelength is altered moves from radio through audible to visible light (creating an aura of light in the air at Stonehenge) and then finally gamma rays! It is discovered that the only thing that can save the world is currently located in the hands of a fanatic who has already killed one officer and he is now with his armed followers in the US the decision is taken to send in four police officers instead of, say, the entire National Guard to obtain the only object that can save the world.

It should also be noted that this film demonstrates why American actors should never attempt British accents. Some of them go through three different accents ranging from generic British to Australian to American and back again in just three lines.

I don't think it can be stated just how bad this movie is. It's not even worth wasting your time watching it on television.
20 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A low budget end to the world
one9eighty9 August 2017
I was drawn to this film, or at least my girlfriend was, upon seeing that Misha Collins was in it - she loves him in 'Supernatural' and has practically converted me into a fan too. But how would he stand up by himself, without those Winchester boys and Crowley to support him? The answer is, not that bad actually.

This is your typical low budget Sy-Fy film which uses CGI to drive a usually weak plot forward. A group of scientists unearth a skeleton and a piece of machinery near Stonehenge. They accidentally trigger a countdown to the apocalypse, potentially dooming all of mankind. Collins plays Jacob, a misunderstood scientist trying to save everything. In truth he plays it in a very Castiel tongue in cheek way (just without the wings and grace). Torri Higginson plays Kaycee who delivers in an unoffensive manner, much like the rest of the cast, there aren't many moments when the acting is cheesy - it's more a case that they do their best without over or under acting. There were blatant plot holes and gaffes galore, the CGI was shockingly bad at times and it was obviously filmed in America rather than anywhere near England. It feels more like a low budget student film rather than your usual Sy-Fy trash, which actually surprised me. I watch a lot of rubbish films and I expected this to be one of those, but in truth it was slightly classier than some of the other rubbish I watch. It's got a little bit of action, a little pace, and enough of a plot and script to keep me entertained. For this reason I'm giving it a 5 out of 10 - not offensive rubbish that I'd avoid, but likewise not a noteworthy addition to the cinematographic world.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than 2012
scottwallvashon13 June 2010
This was much better than I expected. It actually had an idea and a structure. It provided the "theory" that was missing from the much more extravagant 2012.

The ending not only tied the plot together, but gave a nice finishing touch to the story's hero. And the hero of the story was much more appealing than the self-righteous know-it-all that they typically feature in this type of movie.

If this movie had more impressive special effects and more style, it would be a superior version of the 2012 film. It is a mystery to me how 2012 got made without a real plot, but this movie that actually has a plot got made on such a small budget.
57 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Joke.
sonicforever-965-6697541 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
*CONTAINS SPOILERS* What can I say other than the fact that this film is so bad that it has offended me enough to register on IMDb! Okay, the premise was alright I guess but thats where the good stuff ends. The characters are awful, the budget was obviously not enough, Stonehenge was an awful CGI that didn't even resemble actuality in the slightest. No research has even taken place during, or before, production to even get the scenery around Stonehenge correct, a simple photograph would have been sufficient. The military vehicles included a single accurate Land Rover but then also used American ones, a Humvee and even a WW2 Willys Jeep (All left hand drive of course)! How low budget do they think the UK military is?. For some reason US forces were all over the place and running the show, up to and including deciding to 'Nuke' the monument, yeah right. Okay Sci-Fi is Sci-Fi but give me a break, not a single American would be present or allowed to help with any of these decisions. The roads, signs, markings and even telegraph poles were clearly American. Continuation was also a major issue with the mass re-use of shots/ scenes and little things like charred or removed turf managing to somehow regrow in about ten minutes flat. Awful film, just awful.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
watch it if you like SciFi
EchoMaRinE1 January 2011
I like movies that gives what they promise and this movie is certainly one of those. The story is quite interesting and it seems they managed to use their limited budget pretty good. Visuals are not stunning but not disturbing as well. Acting is OK and story is consistent. If you like SciFi movies, it is quite likely that you may enjoy this one. I don't think it would be fair to compare it with high budget SciFi movies but the overall idea and story telling kept me watching it till the end and I didn't regret. As a last word, I would say watch it if you like SciFi and alien conspiracies but lower your expectancies a bit. Otherwise, you may get bored.
13 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I Liked It
arcdanku9 October 2010
I liked this movie, OK it is absurd but somehow it managed to keep my interest alive. The scene in which the temple rises out of the earth is simply superb. The characters are believable and the acting is reasonably good. I don't expect George Lucas, Stanley Kubrick or even Wes Craven on most SyFy Saturday night movies, I wanted a movie that wasn't completely stupid (OK, not completely SERIOUSLY stupid, it was absurd & knew it, & had fun with it) and with a nice interesting pace, & this movie was surely it. Of course I wouldn't dream of spending money to see it! Overall, better than most cheapo sci-fi movies, fair to good acting (I think the lead character plays Castiel on Supernatural).
32 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The word BAD cannot be written often enough to describe this
HeadMMoid12 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is an insult to anyone and everyone who ever sat through a science or history class in school. It is not possible to include or describe the unbelievable number of gross factual errors in this movie. One must conclude that the writers knew absolutely nothing about the locations and artifacts included.

In a desperate (and failed) attempt to get the viewer to buy into the story, we are told; 1) the Earth's breathable atmosphere was created by ancient world wide machines, 2) ancient mega structures known to have been built by separate cultures, thousands of years apart, were contemporary and built by an unknown alien civilization, and 3) pyramids mark the location of volcanoes and can trigger volcanic eruptions … and that is just the start.

For those who like clichés, this movie is for you. Insane civilization hating cult bent on ending modern life, a mindless military determined to do exactly the wrong thing, discredited pseudo-scientist who is the only one with the solution, lone scientist who believes in the pseudo-scientist for personal reasons, remorseless countdown to the world's end, guns that never need to be reloaded … plus many, many, OMG way too many, more

The writers, producers, and director of this movie have shown a level of incompetence almost beyond belief, and, for the good of humanity, should be forever barred from working in the entertainment industry.
25 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not bad but get it right ...
cliffoginski16 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Not bad as far as Syfy Channel fare is concerned. It had a decent plot. Strong enough for suspension of belief to carry the story. But get real ... the US military running rampant all over Stonehenge on the British Isles. I don't think so. And the travelling from Britain to North America and back seemed awfully fast. At least in the climax they actually mentioned a supersonic jet. I think the writer was trying to Americanize the story when it wasn't needed. CGI was cheesy at times but bearable for what is essentially a B movie. Despite the flaws, the characters from Supernatural, Stargate Atlantis, and Highlander did a good job of carrying the story.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
awful
Jimbo-16112 October 2010
Hard to believe this ever got released....to say it is awful is almost a compliment.....the best facet of the movie is the plot.......it's all down hill from there.....the actors did their best but ....the script is bad....filming and animation worse....and so very disjointed...an hour and a half of my life I'll never get back. I have to have ten lines of text....maybe they are expecting me to write a sequel....but that would only take three or four...so maybe its a mini series they are after?! My favourite part of the film is when the British officer , Jordan, and leading lady all leave Salisbury Plain...then are immediately in New York all wearing the same Clothes...I thought that was the most awesome awful.

I love Sci Fi too!!
13 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Why bother with location scouts...
wilmar-taal27 January 2011
First I want to express my most sincere condolences to the genre of the disaster movie: U R Dead. All these pathetic flicks that Syfy releases on the world are either totally unbelievable or very badly scouted for locations. If you want to rebuilt the Stonehenge somewhere in the USA, fine with me, but put in a little effort, will ya? Where was the heelstone? Nowhere to be found. The scientist with the woowoo theory drives to Stonehenge over the grass, while a perfect asphalt road runs beside it. There is even a visitors center near the monument and around the henge itself is an asphalt path for people to walk on. Tourists never come in between the megaliths themselves. And usually it is crowded over there, and in the movie it seems that it is always peace and quiet around the Stonehenge...

The story... Need I bother you? Predictable, cardboard characters and not even one second of humor added to the narrative, making this a sore hour and a half that I will never get back...
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Quite possibly the worst movie I've ever seen.
femoose21 May 2012
Not only was the story and acting awful, the special effects brought the movie to sub-campy levels. Once again Hollywood tried to capitalize on the mystique of Stonehenge and come up lacking. The dwarfs dancing around the 18" high triptychs in "This is Spinal Tap" was more believable than the Styrofoam mock-ups obviously created by a 3rd grade art class. I particularly liked the left-hand drive vehicles supposedly used by the Royal Army in Salisbury. Please take a pass on this waste of time - you'll regret wasting these precious minutes of your life. There are so many glaring errors of omission, ignorance and historical facts that they are too numerous to list here: Let me try: The bomb dropped (although a missile is fired) was not a nuke, but a laser guided bomb; the position of Stonehenge moved several times on the idiotic map continually shown, all physics were suspended when traveling to and fro across the Atlantic--the time involved is unachievable even if the phantom aircraft were magically available. This movie sucks.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Stick with the Creature Features
Roddenhyzer7 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Just to get this straight, I have absolutely nothing against Syfy Originals in general. Mostly, they're refreshingly irony-free throwbacks to classic drive-in b-movies and those giant monster flicks that Hollywood and independent studios alike tend to neglect. This one, however, was quite different, and not necessarily for the best.

I guess my biggest issue, aside from the absolutely worthless protagonist, was the presentation of the story. An amazingly large part of the movie consists of very little more than a group of scientists *observing* the actual location of interest via monitors and meters. They analyze the data and discuss the mysterious threat that's supposed to be rising by the minute with as much melodrama as possible, but the fact remains that all we see is people *talking* about a dangerous situation from a safe distance. It hampers the sense of tension that's needed for a "Countdown to Doomsday" movie to work. It's not necessarily boring as much as it feels like a distraction from what *should* be the real focus, namely the actual sites of the strange phenomena. There are exceptions, of course; some of the later action scenes and special effects sequences really are pretty well executed for a TV movie, but they're only a minuscule portion of the whole.

All in all, "Stonehenge Apocalypse" is one of the weaker Syfy Originals I've seen. It's undeniably much more coherent and serious than many of the others, but it thoroughly lacks true excitement and tension. The fact that most of its major plot devices are mere references to established real world pseudo-sciences, inelegantly thrown in there like quotes from their respective Wikipedia articles, certainly doesn't help.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Loved it!
rkhnzshn3 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Honestly? It was great in a so-bad-it's-good way. They could not have had a budget of more than £10 and it showed.

The acting (for the most part) was good. That being said, the forced British accents made me wince.

The name says it all, what would you expect from a film with the name 'Stonehenge Apocalypse'? I'll tell you, terrible graphics that could have been made at 3am in the dark, and scenes that don't make any sense (i.e; the Prime Minister deciding to nuke Stonehenge?)

Near(ish) the end I could not tell whether they were in the U. S or the UK. It got to the point that I could only assume that Pangea had reformed and they walked across the borders.

The ending line "It was a robot head!" hit a part of me that I never knew existed before I watched this film. All in all: Laughable graphics and a poorly made film with a terrible script. I loved it!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good SciFi movie
jmiller-960-62407126 January 2011
I found Stonehenge Apocalypse to be quite entertaining. To put it into perspective, this was a low budget movie and so the viewers expectations should not be 'Star Wars'. But even with that, I believe the story line was good and the actors did an excellent job. There were some loose moments, but having seen enough science fiction movies (even the bad ones), I can assure you that this was a good and entertaining movie.

I read some of the previous reviews and found them quite negative. There was one review (seems from a SciFi fan) that seemed to be closer to what I had experienced (I am also a hardcore SciFi fan).

Don't expect 'Star Wars' from this and you will be quite entertained. People who consider themselves SciFi fans should definitely check this movie out.
12 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Really don't... really!
dancingdebra22 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I usually like this sort of thing and was quite intrigued by the beginning of this film. But I must admit didn't make it more than half way through. I guess my review may have been different if I had, as some reviews mention how it is all brought together well at the end. But I gave up shortly after the discredited hero managed to wander onto a site apparently being monitored by all sorts of government agencies after something apocalyptic happened. And I think if you are going to mention an amazing landmark in your title, you could at least arrange to film there or make up a decent set elsewhere instead of using shaky CGI. Not for me and I can't imagine it's for most viewers when there's so much else to choose.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Brilliant!
Crazy_Cat_Lady-Paula8 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This is a truly dreadful film, which is what makes it so good! On a sensible note: the film had potential with some good actors, but they were let down by accents on a par with Dick Van Dyke's cockney. There are quite a few similarities to the Stargate franchise, but as the cast is made up of mostly Stargate actors, it's not really surprising. Hill Harper is great as the mad professor. Enjoy !
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining, but not great
timlasiuta1 January 2011
The central theme of the film, prophetic words seem to come close to reality in 2012 after the discovery of a magnetic chamber, is not new. However, no matter how used the concept is, the delivery of Stonehenge Apocalypse, is marvelous.

Conspiracy radio show host (and award winning physicist), Jacob, uncovers a series of magnetic disturbances AND learns that a group of tourists have been destroyed at Stonehenge. For him, this is a clear call to GO to Henge and uncover what is going on. Around the world, magnetic vortices's are exhibiting dangerous signs (volcanic eruptions et al) and destroying Mexico, Malaysia, Egypt (Giza), and maybe Maine. His mission, as he chooses to accept it, to stop the nuclear destruction of Stonehenge by a mad military leader before he can find the key to the disturbances and turn off the terra forming he suspects is going on! Betrayal, action, transatlantic travel at light speed, and indoctrination through a series of revelatory discoveries makes this a National Treasure of Destruction.

Having said that, I liked it. It is not factual, nor academy award material, but it is a good film that will make you appreciate the fact that even well intentioned films can still be passable. SyFy is to be applauded for giving voice to films like these that can often be better than the high budget LOTR genres.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Stonehenge stolen from Wales and turned into tourist attraction.
husbandadrian22 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
If only American audiences had access to the ancient knowledge of the 'stones'. We Celts took ages carving them from the mountains in south Wales and were about to arrange them in a spiral pattern just north of Bridgend when the English with their usual arrogance attacked and overcame us with an army of mercenaries recruited mainly from Europe. After killing most of our men and forcing the remaining women and children to only wear tartan they levitated the stones to the county of Wiltshire in England with the help of some Egyptian tourists well versed in the dark art of astral travel and improvised dance. This film is just another example of how Americans or Canadians or whatever can't help rewriting history just to suit themselves to earn a fast buck little realising that Merlins' curse will follow them to the end of time, until the prophecies of our Druid leaders are fulfilled and the Empire of Wales is finally restored to it's rightful place.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed